Jump to content

Make a statement now

9-3

By 9-3
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Matthew Le God

Matthew Le God

Posted
Posted
The silence is deafening.

 

It is frustrating.

 

It is frustrating 9-3 wants constant updates about something the fans don't need a minute by minute account of. We'll find out in due course, us knowing or not isn't going to make a difference.

Charlie Wayman

Charlie Wayman

Posted
Posted
It is frustrating 9-3 wants constant updates about something the fans don't need a minute by minute account of. We'll find out in due course, us knowing or not isn't going to make a difference.

 

I suppose it depends upon whether or not you believe that fans are stakeholders in the club and as such to expect to have some entitlement to be kept informed. As the club promotes "Together as One" and other similar slogans to rally people to the cause then it is perfectly reasonable for people like 9-3 in the absence of any communications to feel that they are being ignored and deliberately kept in the dark.

Harry_SFC

Harry_SFC

Posted
Posted

There isn't any need for a statement unless something is official however I'd like to think things are progressing behind the scenes. Hopefully Les Reed has learnt from his mistakes during January and is getting the managerial situation sorted now.

miserableoldgit

miserableoldgit

Posted
Posted

It will be the build up to the new season before you know it. If RK or MP were still our Manager there wouldn't be a problem but as there is an obvious problem with CP you would think that a certain amount of decisiveness was called for. I am not naturally a knee jerker but for virtually the first time in 60 years of watching Saints (and this includes the Branfoot debacle) I have not been excited watching the team. CO seems a decent principled bloke but not a good fit for us. We mustn't be left behind....there's not a lot of time....

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

The9

The9

Posted
Posted
I'm rather glad our club isn't like West Ham where the owners (or their sons) give a running commentary on how the club is run on Twitter.

 

Quite.

The9

The9

Posted
Posted
The club should have made a statement about Puel.

 

What, like "he's still the manager"? Why would they say that? Would you like to know who's the third choice sub this week too?

Cartman

Cartman

Posted
Posted
There isn't any need for a statement unless something is official however I'd like to think things are progressing behind the scenes. Hopefully Les Reed has learnt from his mistakes during January and is getting the managerial situation sorted now.

 

What mistakes? We botched last summer but I don't see any mistakes having been made in January.

SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
Posted
I'm rather glad our club isn't like West Ham where the owners (or their sons) give a running commentary on how the club is run on Twitter.

 

It's a shame Jack Sullivan is getting older as I haven't seen him make a tit of himself yet. The summer is still young though.

SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
Posted
The silence is deafening.

 

What's more annoying is that all the stuff going on has robbed me of our annual Les Reed interview about the season just gone. He gets a lot of stick, but I genuinely like those interviews.

Harry_SFC

Harry_SFC

Posted
Posted
What mistakes? We botched last summer but I don't see any mistakes having been made in January.

 

Are you telling me you were happy with the way the Centre Back situation was handled by the club?

 

To let Fonte leave before we had a replacement in was criminal and contributed to us losing the EFL cup final.

nta786

nta786

Posted
Posted

so when les reed opens his mouth he'd only get negative comments from people here anyway.

 

 

id prefer it myself if he didn't come out with comments that will only bite him in the ar*e later tbh

cellone

cellone

Posted
Posted
so when les reed opens his mouth he'd only get negative comments from people here anyway. (Not unduly)

 

 

id prefer it myself if he didn't come out with comments that will only bite him in the ar*e later tbh

Completely agree. If Les Got his head down and wasn't heard from until the end of the window because he is too busy grafting away I'd be happy. Leave Ralph to theishtalk.

Cartman

Cartman

Posted
Posted
Are you telling me you were happy with the way the Centre Back situation was handled by the club?

 

To let Fonte leave before we had a replacement in was criminal and contributed to us losing the EFL cup final.

 

Have you seen Fonte playing lately? On this season's form he would be our 4th choice. Virgil's injury cost us the league cup final because guess what, we only have one CB at his level, Fonte's sale didn't have anything to do with it. 8m for a player in clear decline, throwing is toys out of the pram because we wanted a big last contract and now inferior to our other CB was a good deal, another Lambert like sale. And we got Gabbi, it was a very good window. It was the summer that we messed up.

saints-til-i-die

saints-til-i-die

Posted
Posted

Re-read Les Reed's January comments about Puel. He talks about him being a 'teacher' and teaching 'takes time'. He also said in a previous interview that when they appoint managers they tell them they'll get time and support and not need to be 'looking over their shoulder'.

 

All this would seem to indicate that he is likely staying.

glengarryleads

glengarryleads

Posted
Posted
There isn't any need for a statement unless something is official however I'd like to think things are progressing behind the scenes. Hopefully Les Reed has learnt from his mistakes during January and is getting the managerial situation sorted now.

 

the managerial situation, as in, we have a manager, a good one, under contract?

Miltonaggro

Miltonaggro

Posted
Posted
Re-read Les Reed's January comments about Puel. He talks about him being a 'teacher' and teaching 'takes time'. He also said in a previous interview that when they appoint managers they tell them they'll get time and support and not need to be 'looking over their shoulder'.

 

All this would seem to indicate that he is likely staying.

 

As a former inner city PE teacher Les Reed knows an inspirational teacher when he sees one, the government should see sense and make him Minister of Education (plus expenses).

scotty

scotty

Posted
Posted

Although I had second snap at this particular fly, I really wasn't expecting thirty-odd bites here. It's quiet out there.....too damn quiet.....

Bad Wolf

Bad Wolf

Posted
Posted
Re-read Les Reed's January comments about Puel. He talks about him being a 'teacher' and teaching 'takes time'. He also said in a previous interview that when they appoint managers they tell them they'll get time and support and not need to be 'looking over their shoulder'.

 

All this would seem to indicate that he is likely staying.

 

That was before it became obvious he wanted to go to the French club.

GGalpin

GGalpin

Posted
Posted

A statement on Puel, or a statement on how Jack Stephens and Sam McQueen will be worth £50 million plus each in next two years?

Charlie Wayman

Charlie Wayman

Posted
Posted
Why should they make a statement if Puel is still manager

 

You've answered your own question. Put an end to the rumours so that everyone knows where they stand.

 

"We are aware of the speculation in the press and amongst fans concerning the manager's position here at SFC but we want to re-iterate that that is exactly what it is, speculation about which we can do nothing. Claude Puel has a three year contract to be head coach of SFC and this remains the position"

 

Now what harm is there is saying that, it took me just 30 seconds to write that! 30 Seconds!

CB Fry

CB Fry

Posted
Posted
You've answered your own question. Put an end to the rumours so that everyone knows where they stand.

 

"We are aware of the speculation in the press and amongst fans concerning the manager's position here at SFC but we want to re-iterate that that is exactly what it is, speculation about which we can do nothing. Claude Puel has a three year contract to be head coach of SFC and this remains the position"

 

Now what harm is there is saying that, it took me just 30 seconds to write that! 30 Seconds!

 

If they released that statement your fu cking head would explode.

diggers

diggers

Posted
Posted

At the end of the day, wether we agree or not, we are not just fans, but customers.

In my experience a corporations customers only get informed of major restructuring after all the details of the plan have been implemented. Imagine if this wasn't football, your long term solicitors are thinking of changing your favorite lawyer, do they contact you and say " hey, we're thinking of sacking XXXX and hoping to persuade XXXX to join us"? Or do the post office get in touch to say that they believe they should take Joe the postie off his round and they are hoping to hire a fitter younger replacement if he accepts the post?

It's only because it's football and we all get so carried away, thinking we have any say in the plans of the club we love.

BallBoy

BallBoy

Posted
Posted

I am not as concerned about fans being given information as I am about the players. It may well affect how they respond to enquiries from other clubs.

brett24

brett24

Posted
Posted

The fact that there is now news is a good sign. Tuchel ruled out Leverkusen today. I think Puel out and Tuchel in will be announced on the same day.

Lighthouse

Lighthouse

Posted
Posted
You've answered your own question. Put an end to the rumours so that everyone knows where they stand.

 

"We are aware of the speculation in the press and amongst fans concerning the manager's position here at SFC but we want to re-iterate that that is exactly what it is, speculation about which we can do nothing. Claude Puel has a three year contract to be head coach of SFC and this remains the position"

 

Now what harm is there is saying that, it took me just 30 seconds to write that! 30 Seconds!

 

Yeah, if you want the club to just state the bleedin' obvious, not add any information and fuel further speculation with a completely non-commital statement on Puel's position.

SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
Posted
The fact that there is now news is a good sign. Tuchel ruled out Leverkusen today. I think Puel out and Tuchel in will be announced on the same day.

 

Got a link?

Mowgli

Mowgli

Posted
Posted
Yeah, if you want the club to just state the bleedin' obvious, not add any information and fuel further speculation with a completely non-commital statement on Puel's position.

 

 

Absolutely. If posters actually know what the club could be saying, why do they actually need to say it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...