Lighthouse Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 8th in the League and a cup final makes for a rather obvious comprising but looking slightly deeper WGS and co. - 43 Goals - 46 against - 52 points CPs Red Army - 41 Goals - 47 against - 46 points For argument's sake, let's suppose we bet Stoke 1-0 tomorrow and we reversed that 1-2 home defeat to West Brom. Points, GF and GA would then be completely identical, without any real departure from how we've actually played this season. Baring that in mind, was that season really all it was cracked up to be? Perhaps it is looked back upon fondly, simply by contrast to some of the dross that was served up in the seasons preceding and following. Will Puel, in spite of current opinion, be looked back upon as the man who simultaneous guided us to a cup final, despite a European campaign, whilst maintaining a top half finish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevy777_x Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 8th in the League and a cup final makes for a rather obvious comprising but looking slightly deeper WGS and co. - 43 Goals - 46 against - 52 points CPs Red Army - 41 Goals - 47 against - 46 points For argument's sake, let's suppose we bet Stoke 1-0 tomorrow and we reversed that 1-2 home defeat to West Brom. Points, GF and GA would then be completely identical, without any real departure from how we've actually played this season. Baring that in mind, was that season really all it was cracked up to be? Perhaps it is looked back upon fondly, simply by contrast to some of the dross that was served up in the seasons preceding and following. Will Puel, in spite of current opinion, be looked back upon as the man who simultaneous guided us to a cup final, despite a European campaign, whilst maintaining a top half finish? Think fans have been spoilt over the last 3 seasons. Unless we manage to keep our best players we are bound to have ups and down. Did you think it would be that easy to replace Mane, Pelle and wanyama? Yes we have replaced them but you can t expect them to hit the ground running straightaway. Nice finished 17th one season and then 4th the next because he was building the team, it takes time to gel. Plus Mane was a freak, he scored goals and allowed his team mates to score by opening space for them. He was one of the main reasons long was into double figures He is a world class player and Take him out of last years team and i m not sure we would have done that much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nta786 Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 Think fans have been spoilt over the last 3 seasons. Unless we manage to keep our best players we are bound to have ups and down. Did you think it would be that easy to replace Mane, Pelle and wanyama? Yes we have replaced them but you can t expect them to hit the ground running straightaway. Nice finished 17th one season and then 4th the next because he was building the team, it takes time to gel. Plus Mane was a freak, he scored goals and allowed his team mates to score by opening space for them. He was one of the main reasons long was into double figures He is a world class player and Take him out of last years team and i m not sure we would have done that much better. We got lucky in parts too last season. Gonna give some examples- last season home game at WHU- probably should have conceded a oenalty from Yoshida's foul- and think another case could be made at our away game to Swansea- should have concdded a pen. Also factor in that we played Manchester City at the oerfect time because they had a CL semifinal game following the game against us so played a second string XI which we beat. Just with those three games, you take out say 5 points from the 9 we actually got then we would have finished 8th anyway I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 2003 by a mile in relative terms, WGS had a far inferior squad and got the most out of more players than Puel is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGTL Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 WGS managed it with such heavyweights as Marsden, Oakley, Lundekvam and Omerod. His was a far greater achievement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 2003 by a mile in relative terms, WGS had a far inferior squad and got the most out of more players than Puel is WGS managed it with such heavyweights as Marsden, Oakley, Lundekvam and Omerod. His was a far greater achievement. This and that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGTL Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 We got lucky in parts too last season. Gonna give some examples- last season home game at WHU- probably should have conceded a oenalty from Yoshida's foul- and think another case could be made at our away game to Swansea- should have concdded a pen. Also factor in that we played Manchester City at the oerfect time because they had a CL semifinal game following the game against us so played a second string XI which we beat. Just with those three games, you take out say 5 points from the 9 we actually got then we would have finished 8th anyway I think. If my aunt had a cock she'd be my uncle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Munster Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 Think fans have been spoilt over the last 3 seasons. Unless we manage to keep our best players we are bound to have ups and down. Did you think it would be that easy to replace Mane, Pelle and wanyama? Yes we have replaced them but you can t expect them to hit the ground running straightaway. Nice finished 17th one season and then 4th the next because he was building the team, it takes time to gel. Plus Mane was a freak, he scored goals and allowed his team mates to score by opening space for them. He was one of the main reasons long was into double figures He is a world class player and Take him out of last years team and i m not sure we would have done that much better. Top post. Shame it'll fly right over the Puel-out mob's heads though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 20 May, 2017 Author Share Posted 20 May, 2017 2003 by a mile in relative terms, WGS had a far inferior squad and got the most out of more players than Puel is WGS managed it with such heavyweights as Marsden, Oakley, Lundekvam and Omerod. His was a far greater achievement. Is Long better than Ormerod? Is Yoshida better than Claus? JWP better than Oakley? Davis better than Marsden? It goes on.... Boufal/Anders Tadic/Fernandes Bertrand/Bridge We didn't have anyone close to Romeu but we don't have anyone this year consistently as good as Niemi, Killer or Beattie. I'm not sure this squad is that much better, a couple of individuals aside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGTL Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 Is Long better than Ormerod? Is Yoshida better than Claus? JWP better than Oakley? Davis better than Marsden? It goes on.... Boufal/Anders Tadic/Fernandes Bertrand/Bridge We didn't have anyone close to Romeu but we don't have anyone this year consistently as good as Niemi, Killer or Beattie. I'm not sure this squad is that much better, a couple of individuals aside. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 (edited) Big difference between 2003 and this season a striker who got 24 goals I wonder if we will ever see a 20+ a season PL striker at saints again. Edited 20 May, 2017 by doddisalegend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 Is Long better than Ormerod? Is Yoshida better than Claus? JWP better than Oakley? Davis better than Marsden? It goes on.... Boufal/Anders Tadic/Fernandes Bertrand/Bridge We didn't have anyone close to Romeu but we don't have anyone this year consistently as good as Niemi, Killer or Beattie. I'm not sure this squad is that much better, a couple of individuals aside. That's the spine of the team a striker bang on form, an excellent goal keeper and a beast of a CB we had one of those this season and he got injured half way through. Todays squad is better but our squad this season really could have done with those three types of player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
positivepete Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 The football this season is miles better than 2003. We barely had any shots on goal, never got anyone in the opposition penalty area, and the style was dire. At least we mostly have a go this season, we may be rubbish at converting chances, but at least we create them. That WGS period was the only period I considered giving up my season ticket. I would take the relegation season with the Dutch duo over the WGS bore fest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom & Gerry Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 So lets get this right. The Saints Web bench mark is:- Poch P38 W15 D11 L12 F53 A45 Pos 8th = genius WGS P38 W13 D13 L12 F43 A46 Pos 8th = very good manager Puel P37 W12 D10 L15 F41 A47 Pos 8th = should be sacked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 So lets get this right. The Saints Web bench mark is:- Poch P38 W15 D11 L12 F53 A45 Pos 8th = genius WGS P38 W13 D13 L12 F43 A46 Pos 8th = very good manager Puel P37 W12 D10 L15 F41 A47 Pos 8th = should be sacked if it was just about league position, Branfoot would be rated higher than Adkins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highfield Saint Posted 20 May, 2017 Share Posted 20 May, 2017 Is Long better than Ormerod? Is Yoshida better than Claus? JWP better than Oakley? Davis better than Marsden? It goes on.... Boufal/Anders Tadic/Fernandes Bertrand/Bridge We didn't have anyone close to Romeu but we don't have anyone this year consistently as good as Niemi, Killer or Beattie. I'm not sure this squad is that much better, a couple of individuals aside. You have to compare the relative strengths of the division as well. Is the league and players stronger than 2003? Probably yes as clubs have the financial strength to recruit from across Europe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Boy Saint Posted 21 May, 2017 Share Posted 21 May, 2017 2003 probably stood out because after many years of getting away with it, ok Hoddle bucked that a little, Strachan suddenly had us Saints fans reaching for the oxygen and enjoying the view from an unfamiliar position high up the table. The last 10 minutes of games were fun because Strachan had the team fit enough to last 120 minutes. I always remember driving home from the Boxing Day Spurs game which we won 1-0, Mrs JBS said "did you feel the atmosphere change in the ground when the clock on the screen clicked over to 80 minutes? It suddenly became tangibly tense and nervous!". I said that I didn't, probably because I was contributing to it. We actually got to a FA Cup final too, the first final for 20 (?) years, we weren't sweating on needing ours and others results to go the right way on the last day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom & Gerry Posted 21 May, 2017 Share Posted 21 May, 2017 if it was just about league position, Branfoot would be rated higher than Adkins So where is the tipping point? 8th with a lot of boring football (mainly at home) but a good losing performance in a final is not good enough. Would 17th but with lots of goals for and against be rated better than 5th with lots of boring 1-0's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyNumber7 Posted 21 May, 2017 Share Posted 21 May, 2017 At least we mostly have a go this season, we may be rubbish at converting chances, but at least we create them. That WGS period was the only period I considered giving up my season ticket. I would take the relegation season with the Dutch duo over the WGS bore fest You must have been watching completely different games to me this season, most games at SMS we have done anything but go for it, and that is my main gripe with Puel. He sets us up to not lose, rather than to try and win. I also think you're being harsh on WGS, we had far more exciting games under him than we've had under Puel, and he was working with much more limited players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Fry Posted 21 May, 2017 Share Posted 21 May, 2017 So where is the tipping point? 8th with a lot of boring football (mainly at home) but a good losing performance in a final is not good enough. Would 17th but with lots of goals for and against be rated better than 5th with lots of boring 1-0's? If we'd spent the last four months shopping goals left right and centre, conceding 2 and 3 but still managing the exact same results, points and GD as now the same meltdowners would be having the same meltdown, just about a different thing: they'd been frothing with absolute fury at our failure to replace Fonte and our hopeless defense. None of these people would be drooling about how jolly entertaining it has all been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StDunko Posted 21 May, 2017 Share Posted 21 May, 2017 If we'd spent the last four months shopping goals left right and centre, conceding 2 and 3 but still managing the exact same results, points and GD as now the same meltdowners would be having the same meltdown, just about a different thing: they'd been frothing with absolute fury at our failure to replace Fonte and our hopeless defense. None of these people would be drooling about how jolly entertaining it has all been. This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now