trousers Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 If think tactically the game is going exactly as we want it to. This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 this is better....couple of good chances but up'd the tempo a bit....worked their defence/keeper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Fantastic from Forster! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Penalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Fantastic from Forster! got it that was a penalty and people say we dont get the luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OttawaSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Well done ref! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmonton Saint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Forster got away with that. Looked a pen to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 what did he do? Watch it closely, touches it with his fingertips. From the angle out wide, the ball slows down ever so slightly as it goes past Forsters hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OttawaSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Scouse git thought it was a pen as did Poll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoswellSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Forster got away with that. Looked a pen to me. Agree! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Watch it closely, touches it with his fingertips Forster didn't touch it IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Forster didn't touch it IMO Feel free to watch that angle again, no other explanation for the change in speed of the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg Posted 15 April, 2017 Author Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Cancel that video technology Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoswellSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Scouse git thought it was a pen as did Poll. Watch the replays. I think we were very lucky. But I'm happy with that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Clearly gets the touch from that angle but the commos are too biased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Never a booking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Feel free to watch that angle again, no other explanation for the change in speed of the ball. Have watched the replay. Sane nudged it left just as Forster reached for it, which made it look like Forster touched it from the other angles. Edit: actually, just watched the angle from behind the goal and now I'm not so sure! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obelisk Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Ref giving Saints nothing at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrian lord Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 fingertips of Forster deffo touched it and altered the trajectory of the ball! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoswellSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Cancel that video technology [emoji106] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OttawaSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Hmm, still can't see whether a) he got the ball or b) he got Sane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Have watched the replay. Sane nudged it left just as Forster reached for it, which made it look like Forster touched it from the other angles. Nope, the touch from Forster was AFTER Sane nudged it wide. Clear as day on the angle from behind the goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Have watched the replay. Sane nudged it left just as Forster reached for it, which made it look like Forster touched it from the other angles. Edit: just watched the angle from behind the goal and now I'm not so sure! Forster gets a tiny touch on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Chalet Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Fine margins. But you see the pattern of the ball change direction. Slightest nick by Forster but ball first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OttawaSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Ref giving Saints nothing at all. Apart for the pen decision. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donatello Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 I'm seeing the touch too, but I'm not sure if that's the bias talking. There's definitely an angle where Forster's finger tips react to something (I.e. the ball) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Nope, the touch from Forster was AFTER Sane nudged it wide. Clear as day on the angle from behind the goal. Yep, agree now. The angle behind the goal is more revealing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obelisk Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Apart for the pen decision. Lol Nah! He gave a corner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrfahaji Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Never a booking. Cedric? It's an example of how "going to ground" shouldn't automatically be a booking. Hardly the same as Hojbjerg's earlier! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shance Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 That wasn't a pen. Forster got a touch on the ball. Great bit of goalkeeping and refereeing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg Posted 15 April, 2017 Author Share Posted 15 April, 2017 HT! take that after City's bright start. Decent attacks and chances for both sides, but neither keeper tested Got lucky with the penalty decision but we were due one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obelisk Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Two yellow cards is the most worrying currently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 HT! take that after City's bright start. Decent attacks and chances for both sides, but neither keeper tested Got lucky with the penalty decision but we were due one. It wasn't a penalty Glasgow so no luck involved, just a correct decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 HT Man city bossing possession, good defending by us we have had 2 good chances really and at times, very poor on the ball the atmosphere sounds horrendous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamplemousse Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Not too bad so far, we will get chances and hopefully we can nick this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Decent enough first half. Yes, City had most possession by far but that appears to be down to our game plan (sit back and hit them on the break) rather than City dominating against our will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shance Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Video also shows he got the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewYorkSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Superbly focused defending. Cedric incredibly impressive. US commentators first thought pen, then looked again and agreed Forster got touch. They had the ball, but we had the best chances. Redmond is such an exciting player. The combo w Gab and Tadic really promising. holding out for a spectacular second half team goal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
austsaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Puel has to change something at H/T. Tadic and Ward-Prowse luxury players today. Either move JWP more centrally and get him helping the midfield or replace him with Clasie. Cedric is all alone defensively down the right side. If we want to win the game rather than hang on for an unlikely scoreless draw, replace Tadic with Boufal. Davis, Cedric and Yoshida all good in an "away" style performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 AHAHAHAHAHAHA bt admit that Forster touches the ball first but it should still be a pen because he brings him down after....what!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OttawaSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Side angle shows a clear touch by FF. but I still can't see if he touched Sane. Looks like a Sane decided to go down, anticipating a touch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pass the Dutchie Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 We could dare a little more. City have everything to lose. We're not going down, we're not getting into Europe. Overall a pretty solid but somewhat boring performance so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InvictaSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 AHAHAHAHAHAHA bt admit that Forster touches the ball first but it should still be a pen because he brings him down after....what!!!! Yes because apparently it "feels" like a pen according to the studio 'experts'...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OttawaSaint Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Hmm, last replay I watched Sane and not the ball anf FF doesn't get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obelisk Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Yeah. FF definitely pushes the ball for a corner. Forward then falls over his arm. No pen regardless of the opinion of the BT chaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vin Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 AHAHAHAHAHAHA bt admit that Forster touches the ball first but it should still be a pen because he brings him down after....what!!!! Absolute nonsense from Poll - second phase my arse. He touched the ball - what is the keeper expected to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg Posted 15 April, 2017 Author Share Posted 15 April, 2017 We could dare a little more. City have everything to lose. We're not going down, we're not getting into Europe. Overall a pretty solid but somewhat boring performance so far. 5 points separates 9th (us) and 15th (AFCB) that's the difference of £14 million in merit money (2m per place) Still alot to play for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baird of the land Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Puel has to change something at H/T. Tadic and Ward-Prowse luxury players today. Either move JWP more centrally and get him helping the midfield or replace him with Clasie. Cedric is all alone defensively down the right side. If we want to win the game rather than hang on for an unlikely scoreless draw, replace Tadic with Boufal. Davis, Cedric and Yoshida all good in an "away" style performance. If Tadic and JWp are luxury players, then Boufal is a super luxury player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 5 points separates 9th (us) and 15th (AFCB) that's the difference of £14 million in merit money (2m per place) Still alot to play for Is Puel eligible for an 8th place finish bonus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obelisk Posted 15 April, 2017 Share Posted 15 April, 2017 Højbjerg needs to be careful. Could easily pick up another yellow. Need to keep 11 of the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now