Heisenberg Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 Graeme Souness already talking of selling Manolo What he said was if (if) he maintains the form hes shown in his first 4 we would struggle to hold onto him. Hes right... We struggle to hold onto decent players
Katalinic Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 What he said was if (if) he maintains the form hes shown in his first 4 we would struggle to hold onto him. Hes right... We struggle to hold onto decent players Same as all the other smaller clubs.
Batman Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 Same as all the other smaller clubs. None in the scale of us though
Saint_clark Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 None in the scale of us though None of them have signed as many quality players as we have either. Anyway, I bet anyone our record transfer fee that Gabbiadini won't go this summer. That's not how we do things.
Batman Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 (edited) Team looks good. Better now with a changed system Edited 19 March, 2017 by Batman
iansums Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 Delighted Puel has ditched the rotation system. Seems to have paid dividends already (as predicted) and imho will improve more once players sync to each others games Buzzing for this one, be interesting to see what a solid 6 weeks of coaching looks like for us COYR FFS Why is it so difficult to understand? We are playing s game every two weeks so there is no need to rotate, come April when we'll be playing two games a week Puel will be rotating again. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Katalinic Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 None in the scale of us though No one else buys and then develops decent players on the scale of us. The reason we can sign them in the first place is that we won't stand in their way.
trousers Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 FFS Why is it so difficult to understand? He does understand. He's aiming for bites, and he gets them.
Saint Fan CaM Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 I suspect its more do do with giving as much game time and experience to Stephens, and to stick with a winning starting 11 during a period where we don't need to rotate, rather than Caceres's fitness per se. Of course this is correct. The club need to keep Stephens on display to provide the temptation for the big clubs to come in and buy up the next wonder kid from the famed Academy. Means the conveyor belt of youth will get a chance in the 1st team - it's the Southampton way right?
trousers Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 Of course this is correct. The club need to keep Stephens on display to provide the temptation for the big clubs to come in and buy up the next wonder kid from the famed Academy. Means the conveyor belt of youth will get a chance in the 1st team - it's the Southampton way right? This'll get a fair few bites too.
Saints foreva Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 Going to need to defend a lot better than we did against Watford if we're going to get anything from here.
BotleySaint Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 Surprised to see the defence the same. We were poor at the back against Watford. Spurs are much more dangerous. Can only assume Caceres must not be fit enough yet.
Heisenberg Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 Just hope Cáceres isnt on the reported 100k a week wages Thats 500k so far for doing nowt.
DT Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 Forster and no Cacares. Why? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Monk Posted 19 March, 2017 Posted 19 March, 2017 Clasie out of the 18 again. Reckon that's him off this summer. Shame, as he looked better this year.
Recommended Posts