Professor Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 Is it my imagination, or has the OS improved? Looking at the player profiles, they appear to be up-to-date and accurate as to who is on the books and who is not - eg No Rasiak, but Skacel still here. The stories are looking more relevant as well, instead of just a quote, attributed to a player, about how well the team will do in the next game. Makes a nice change.
Bailey Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 They have had to up their game upon hearing the news that SaintsWeb will soon be launching!
RobM Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 Aside from the crap spelling, it has got a bit better. Somebody is spending more time getting content onto it, that's for sure. But the spelling is shocking.
toofarnorth Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 I like the way half our defenders profiles say 'A natural midfielder etc'. They could do with changing that or at least add that they enjoy playing out of position.
eurosaint Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 I never look at it, it is sh*t. Excuse me for being pedantic but if you never look at it, how do you know that it is sh!t ??
TopGun Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 Aside from the crap spelling, it has got a bit better. Somebody is spending more time getting content onto it, that's for sure. But the spelling is shocking. Hiley's successors at work no doubt. Be interesting to see if the Birmingham programme is also littered with spelling errors.
RobM Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 Hiley's successors at work no doubt. Be interesting to see if the Birmingham programme is also littered with spelling errors. If it's anything like recent match reports, expect to not only see terrible spelling, but the same word incorrectly spelt in two different ways!
hamster Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 But the home page 'Online Today' section has three of five out of date items; Claus' Testimonial, New Kit Launch and West Ham friendly! Still one of the best official sites around though, and it's FREE (unliked some interweb sites).
wightman35 Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 At the risk of also being pedantic, may I suggest that members of this forum are not the best placed to criticise other people's spelling? The many versions of "definitely" and "disappointing" come to mind!!
krissyboy31 Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 At the risk of also being pedantic, may I suggest that members of this forum are not the best placed to criticise other people's spelling? The many versions of "definitely" and "disappointing" come to mind!! I am definately dissapointed you feel that way!
ottery st mary Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 At the risk of also being pedantic, may I suggest that members of this forum are not the best placed to criticise other people's spelling? The many versions of "definitely" and "disappointing" come to mind!! I definately fink it maikes it moore fun and never dissappointed wiv the yuf off todays edacation beecause wee all maikes mestakes.
S4INT Posted 15 August, 2008 Posted 15 August, 2008 It's become a Total Website. 2/3 post just to tell you i Rolf Harrised when I saw that response...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now