simo Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 If it wasn't for the league cup, I suspect the clamour for Puel to go would be deafening. If we lose our next game he simple has to go , Cup final or not ! You can't kèep a manager with his league record !
stknowle Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 I thought oh Kat's looking quite hot but then realised it was one of the Davids' wives. Ha ha - thought the same.
Heisenberg Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 5 defeats in last 6 Another shocking performance
BotleySaint Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 And just say we did get relegated would that be nothing to do with puel? Indeed. Even when we had a good defence we looked dire. This defence problem is a new one.
Norm Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 I can't see one, not one positive from today's 'display'!
adrian lord Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 And just say we did get relegated would that be nothing to do with puel? I'm sure it's Puel's mum posting
5string Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 I'm normally just 'disappointed' after a defeat, but today I feel annoyed and really quite cross because of the way we just caved in. In fact, we just stopped trying, it seems.
DT Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Six out of seven losses is not very pleasing Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dark Munster Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Hull beating Pool 2-0. Aren't they supposed to be doomed?
5string Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Everton have declared Six[th] off the last ball.
Heisenberg Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 And just say we did get relegated would that be nothing to do with puel? Would be referee bias Bad luck Injuries And Jamie Vardy We will bounce back and win the championship EASY
Edmonton Saint Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 How was crowd reaction at the end? They had all gone home.
St Marco Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 It's a shame that people seem quite happy because they've been proven correct. You sad, sad people. Not at all. The difference is we have been playing poor since November. You base your predictions off of hope, we all want to win. But if you lose 50% of your games logic says chances are you are not that good. When you get beat by Palace, Burnley, Hull, Swansea etc I think saying "we will beat xyz easily" is delusion. You and Always have been wrong for a very very longtime. But it isnt about what is right or wrong it is about judging what you see. 7 defeats in our last 8, 3 points from the last 24 etc tells me we are not as good as you say we are. I don't mean to be critical of you as you want the club to win just as I do. But we are a very poor team with a poor manager so is it surprising we are in freefall?
Mr X Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 six defeats in seven premier league games would surely get most owners/chairmen twitchy??? and the amount of goals we have conceded under puel!
simo Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Nothing to do with Puel IMO - board's failure to sign a defender has cost us. I doubt any manager would do much better. Can't blame the manager for players making individual errors. Will you stop talking rubbish he team plays in the managers image, he picks the team , sets them up and trains them ! Reed maybe at fault for not signing a Cb but he doesn't make us play the awful football we are .
saintant Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 3 points out of 21 is our record over the last 7 games. It's a complete joke and still people defend Puel. He's paid a massive salary and the buck stops with him.
Window Cleaner Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Six out of seven losses is not very pleasing Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk It's what happens when average teams get to Cup Finals. Haven't looked it up but it seems that it's a pretty regular occurence.
OldNick Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 I dont get why Puel is getting the stick, look at Les Ralph and Kat IMO
Restark19 Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Never agreed with those wanting Puel out but it's clear now he has to go
saintant Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 I dont get why Puel is getting the stick, look at Les Ralph and Kat IMO Do they pick the team, take training and decide the tactics as well then - didn't know that.
Shroppie Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 (edited) That's 6 of the last 7 league games lost. Keep that up and we'll endup with 33 points. Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk Edited 4 February, 2017 by Shroppie
Pamplemousse Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 And just say we did get relegated would that be nothing to do with puel? Personally, I think he's been hindered. Firstly, by the Europa League, which historically has always had an effect on teams. Secondly, by the board's failure to a) not sign an additional striker in the summer and b) not sign a defender in January Nevertheless, with this squad, and particularly with the attacking options we've got, we shouldn't be relegated, and I don't think we will. We're only 4 points away from 9th - plenty of time to turn this around. We do need to win at Sunderland though. The team is lacking in confidence obviously and we need to get a good result going into the cup final.
doughnutman Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 First time I've left a match early, the football has been dire for the last few months with endless sideways passing and lack of movement off the ball
Saint Albert Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 That's W.Ham's first win at St. Marys. We lost to an average team, again. I'd suggest that Les relieve Puel of his duties but he'd probably just replace him with Black.
jabei Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Forster has to take all the responsibility for that 3rd goal, for not setting the wall up right. The way it was set out, we basically invited Noble to hit it, knowing full well that the slightest touch would put it in the net. I think Forster has to take responsibility for a lot of goals going in this season....Today is the day I officially start to worry about our Prem safety.
Window Cleaner Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 I dont get why Puel is getting the stick, look at Les Ralph and Kat IMO What's it got to do with Ralph and Kat? One is just a figurehead and we know very well that the other doesn't want to put any more money into the club.
James Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Nothing to do with Puel IMO - board's failure to sign a defender has cost us. I doubt any manager would do much better. Can't blame the manager for players making individual errors. Have you looked at our recent form? It simply cannot be nothing to do with Puel. To say otherwise is just ridiculous. Change the record.
Pamplemousse Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Not at all. The difference is we have been playing poor since November. You base your predictions off of hope, we all want to win. But if you lose 50% of your games logic says chances are you are not that good. When you get beat by Palace, Burnley, Hull, Swansea etc I think saying "we will beat xyz easily" is delusion. You and Always have been wrong for a very very longtime. But it isnt about what is right or wrong it is about judging what you see. 7 defeats in our last 8, 3 points from the last 24 etc tells me we are not as good as you say we are. I don't mean to be critical of you as you want the club to win just as I do. But we are a very poor team with a poor manager so is it surprising we are in freefall? Why ignore the two Liverpool wins? They don't fit into your theory? Why are you deliberately ignoring them? As I said, it's quite pathetic from your point of view (and others) that you are so happy.
teacher Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 I dont get why Puel is getting the stick, look at Les Ralph and Kat IMO I agree! But Puel is the one who coaches and sets up the team. We look clueless and I afraid that our form s down to him. 6 defeats in 7 is not good enough cup final or not, he has got to go before we are dragged into the relegation dogfight (I've said it for months that we are already in it).
Pamplemousse Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Have you looked at our recent form? It simply cannot be nothing to do with Puel. To say otherwise is just ridiculous. Change the record. I don't think there is too much wrong with the tactics or the players picked. If you go back and look through the pre-match threads, people generally have been pretty happy with the team selections. Ironically, I'd say when people seem to think before the match that Puel has got it wrong, we end up winning.
DT Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 'Not too much wrong with tactics'. Wow Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
James Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 I don't think there is too much wrong with the tactics or the players picked. If you go back and look through the pre-match threads, people generally have been pretty happy with the team selections. Ironically, I'd say when people seem to think before the match that Puel has got it wrong, we end up winning. Not too much wrong with the tactics?! Were you at the game today? I presume not.
Micky Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 I've quit a job without another to go to because it's been ****. It's quite common. With all due respect - I doubt you're anywhere near the same employment bracket as Claud Puel. If you were doing his job - right now, you would not quit.
Pamplemousse Posted 4 February, 2017 Posted 4 February, 2017 Not too much wrong with the tactics?! Were you at the game today? I presume not. What would you have done differently then? As I said, before the match, people were pretty happy with the team. After that, it's up to the players to perform.
Recommended Posts