Jump to content

The Aston Villa comparison


spyinthesky
 Share

Recommended Posts

Earlier in the season a poster on here (perhaps with more foresight than most) suggested a parallel with us appointing Puel, with Eric Black as No 2, to Villa's appointment of Remi Garde last season, with Eric Black as his assistant.

 

It could be that we are heading the same way this season with the French Manager (with limited English)/Black combination.

 

Remi Garde always came over as being like a rabbit caught in the headlights and Puel increasingly comes across the same way.

 

Eric Black was not well thought of by many fans at Villa Park and I wonder if history is about to repeat itself.

 

I do hope not but these are worrying times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric Black isn't well thought of in football full stop (as a coach not as a man).

 

I was pretty vocal when we appointed him and I still am now, he isn't good enough. He is a yes man to Puel, a typical drill sergeant coach that delivers generic sessions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric Black isn't well thought of in football full stop (as a coach not as a man).

 

I was pretty vocal when we appointed him and I still am now, he isn't good enough. He is a yes man to Puel, a typical drill sergeant coach that delivers generic sessions.

 

I recall he was introduced as Puel's choice at the time. Was that really the case or was he appointed by the club?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric Black isn't well thought of in football full stop (as a coach not as a man).

 

 

This is true.

 

What I don't want to do is start pointing fingers re: who appointed Black.

 

I don't know this for fact , so the following is just a hunch, but the way Black came into the club was

both very late and very strange.

 

My personal viewpoint based on what I know was that Puel and Black arrived at the club in very different ways, I don't mean logistically,

I mean the way they came here was different.

 

So this is what I think happened:

 

- Black got wind Puel was appointed.

 

- Black called the powers that be and said something like:

 

"I know Puel, I'm essentially out of work, I speak French, I can help."

 

The club **probably** put that to Puel and Puel said "sure, why not".

 

You could call that a Puel appointment but I don't think it was anything close (or the same as) Puel HIMSELF stipulating he wanted

Black as part of his Backroom setup as contract terms of Claude agreeing to come in, I just don't buy that.

 

I really don't think that's the case, based on what I know of how Black arrived.

 

Claude came in with Plancque before Black.

 

Eric Black was and is a big big gamble, I'm not pointing fingers because I'm just guessing with this...but it's an educated guess.

 

True Rotation is down to Puel ultimately and Tactics are down to Puel in part.

 

You look at the way Villa set up last season and you look at how we've looked the last handful of games this season, it's alarmingly similar

and I don't think that's entirely down to Puel.

 

All that being said, here's what's on the website about both appointments:

https://southamptonfc.com/news/2016-07-08/puel-black-and-plancque-are-important-additions

 

^ I'd take that webpage with a bagful of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is true.

 

What I don't want to do is start pointing fingers re: who appointed Black.

 

I don't know this for fact , so the following is just a hunch, but the way Black came into the club was

both very late and very strange.

 

My personal viewpoint based on what I know was that Puel and Black arrived at the club in very different ways, I don't mean logistically,

I mean the way they came here was different.

 

So this is what I think happened:

 

- Black got wind Puel was appointed.

 

- Black called the powers that be and said something like:

 

"I know Puel, I'm essentially out of work, I speak French, I can help."

 

The club **probably** put that to Puel and Puel said "sure, why not".

 

You could call that a Puel appointment but I don't think it was anything close (or the same as) Puel HIMSELF stipulating he wanted

Black as part of his Backroom setup as contract terms of Claude agreeing to come in, I just don't buy that.

 

I really don't think that's the case, based on what I know of how Black arrived.

 

Claude came in with Plancque before Black.

 

Eric Black was and is a big big gamble, I'm not pointing fingers because I'm just guessing with this...but it's an educated guess.

 

True Rotation is down to Puel ultimately and Tactics are down to Puel in part.

 

You look at the way Villa set up last season and you look at how we've looked the last handful of games this season, it's alarmingly similar

and I don't think that's entirely down to Puel.

 

All that being said, here's what's on the website about both appointments:

https://southamptonfc.com/news/2016-07-08/puel-black-and-plancque-are-important-additions

 

^ I'd take that webpage with a bagful of salt.

 

That would make sense as we originally intended to keep Sammy Lee and then surprisingly terminated his contract.

 

Out of interest, would you expect the club to get rid of black before Puel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These Tweets by Villa fans back in June were quite prophetic, as if Puel is sacked during the season, he probably will take over as caretaker manager until the end of the season:

 

Andy Reilly

‏@andysays78

 

Eric Black the new assistant manager of Southampton? Stick your money on them tanking and him stepping in come February.

11:03 AM - 30 Jun 2016

 

Reece

‏@Reece_AV

 

Eric Black has been present at numerous clubs during relegation - surely he can't carry it on at Southampton? #AVFC #SFC

 

10:22 AM - 30 Jun 2016 from Birmingham, England

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where in the league were Villa this time last season? If we're comparing ourselves to Villa might as well do it properly.

 

The board, Reed etc want success so if Black is an issue it will be dealt with. We're 10th in the league and have lost a few games in a row. We've played poorly at times, personally I'll put it down to a lack of a striker which can be resolved this month. Shows you how good we've had it and how far we've come that a few games defeat and people are in meltdown and think somethings wrong. Its a little bit of bad form. Get over yourselves you pathetic bunch of wet wipes. If we don't address the striker issue in January at least, then I think we can start criticising. If we do and it still isn't good enough then I think we can start criticising. Until then grow the **** up and appreciate where we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is true.

 

What I don't want to do is start pointing fingers re: who appointed Black.

 

I don't know this for fact , so the following is just a hunch, but the way Black came into the club was

both very late and very strange.

 

My personal viewpoint based on what I know was that Puel and Black arrived at the club in very different ways, I don't mean logistically,

I mean the way they came here was different.

 

So this is what I think happened:

 

- Black got wind Puel was appointed.

 

- Black called the powers that be and said something like:

 

"I know Puel, I'm essentially out of work, I speak French, I can help."

 

The club **probably** put that to Puel and Puel said "sure, why not".

 

You could call that a Puel appointment but I don't think it was anything close (or the same as) Puel HIMSELF stipulating he wanted

Black as part of his Backroom setup as contract terms of Claude agreeing to come in, I just don't buy that.

 

I really don't think that's the case, based on what I know of how Black arrived.

 

Claude came in with Plancque before Black.

 

Eric Black was and is a big big gamble, I'm not pointing fingers because I'm just guessing with this...but it's an educated guess.

 

True Rotation is down to Puel ultimately and Tactics are down to Puel in part.

 

You look at the way Villa set up last season and you look at how we've looked the last handful of games this season, it's alarmingly similar

and I don't think that's entirely down to Puel.

 

All that being said, here's what's on the website about both appointments:

https://southamptonfc.com/news/2016-07-08/puel-black-and-plancque-are-important-additions

 

^ I'd take that webpage with a bagful of salt.

 

Puel has known Black on a personal level for many years so I'm sure he would have had more input than that. In fact, I remember an interview from one of Puel or Black saying they had a conversation back when they were both working in France that if Puel ever came to manage in England, he would love to work with Black. Here it is. Roughly 30 seconds in:

 

"I'd played against Claude quite a few times when I was playing in France, and we had a mutual friend, so we had met up a couple of times in France, and he's always sort of discussed if the opportunity arose would I come and assist him if he ever came to England?

 

“About six or seven weeks ago, the call came to say 'Would I be interested?' and at that point I came down to meet Les [Reed] and that was a kind of semi-interview, discussion-type scenario, and they offered Claude and then me the job.”

Edited by Disco Stu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Puel has known Black on a personal level for many years so I'm sure he would have had more input than that. In fact, I remember an interview from one of Puel or Black saying they had a conversation back when they were both working in France that if Puel ever came to manage in England, he would love to work with Black.

 

Do you have a link to the interview?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I think that is where the comparison with Villa ends. Our board, the owner, the squad and the youth set up is at a much higher level to that of Villas.

 

Then why did they replace proven goalscorers by gambling with Redmond?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"I'd played against Claude quite a few times when I was playing in France, and we had a mutual friend, so we had met up a couple of times in France, and he's always sort of discussed if the opportunity arose would I come and assist him if he ever came to England?

 

“About six or seven weeks ago, the call came to say 'Would I be interested?' and at that point I came down to meet Les [Reed] and that was a kind of semi-interview, discussion-type scenario, and they offered Claude and then me the job.”

 

I've never entirely bought that interview.

 

Whoever that "Middle man" was that made it happen needs slapping with a dead fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? It would be an odd thing for him to make up in his first interview. Anyway, I'm certain Puel actively wanted Eric Black.

 

Course he did . Someone he's friendly with & gets on with who speaks French & has knowledge of English game. It's a no brainier.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Claude clearly came out on top of a very impressive shortlist. We have not only got the best man, but the right coaching team to support him. Eric Black has an excellent pedigree as a coach and vast experience domestically and internationally." Les Reed 2016

 

"I believe as a group we probably have a choice from the best pool of midfield options in the Premier League." Les Reed 2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...