Jump to content

Q&A with Les Reed


Heisenberg

Recommended Posts

I never said it was fact either, you used that word but several have suggested it, again your wording.

 

I just pointed out its nothing more than an IF...

 

Well yes it's quite obviously IF, hence why almost everyone has caveated their posts about the subject in a similar way. I assumed when you wrote your original post that you were suggesting that some people didn't realise this and were stating it as fact? If that isn't the case and you knew that people realised it was a rumour then the post is pretty unnecessary I would have thought as it's just stating the obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yes it's quite obviously IF, hence why almost everyone has caveated their posts about the subject in a similar way. I assumed when you wrote your original post that you were suggesting that some people didn't realise this and were stating it as fact? If that isn't the case and you knew that people realised it was a rumour then the post is pretty unnecessary I would have thought as it's just stating the obvious.

 

Sadly on here people start to believe things are true because it has been posted on here when little actual facts are available much like if it gets in the news rags so pointing out the IF is not unnecessary at all IMO

 

You can say that forums are all about opinions and rightly but i would suggest this subject should be treated with caution

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly on here people start to believe things are true because it has been posted on here when little actual facts are available much like if it gets in the news rags so pointing out the IF is not unnecessary at all IMO

 

You can say that forums are all about opinions and rightly but i would suggest this subject should be treated with caution

No evidence so far that anyone has started believing things are true in this case so you've been a bit presumptious there. I'm sure everyone is aware of the potential legal ramifications if they started defaming someone but that hasn't happened. Edited by hypochondriac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No evidence so far that anyone has started believing things are true in this case so you've been a bit presumptuous there. I'm sure everyone is aware of the potential legal ramifications if they started defaming someone but that hasn't happened.

 

Not really just a different wording to yours (in bold)

 

But really i think you are just making an issue of it just because its me posting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's something untoward between Les/Midas then i'd assume a paper will dig up the story. Until then it's just speculation. Even if there is a link, it may be nothing sinister. For example i'd imagine a preference for Wolves to do deals with Jorge Mendes' agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...