Kingsland Red Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 Can anyone in the Itchen corner next to the away fans please explain why Nyom did not receive at least a second yellow card for going straight through Long , just before half time. From our angle up in the Kingsland, it looked blatantly obvious.
Sour Mash Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 Because the ref seemed to be telling him to go off subbed at half time and all will be ok. Crazy refereeing.
IN MY DAY Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 Was it really a yellow? Great pressure from Shane at pace but just a coming together. A poor game today, probably the poorest display in some time, when we all question tactics, selection, the lack of fight and poor decision making etc etc. Just one other thing to add to the list. The atmosphere from the home support has been pretty cxxp of late, there's an apathy about the place, with 20mins to go the place should of been rocking to push them on and it was dead. You can knock the passion on the pitch but it ain't much better from the crowd.
Appy Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 Foul, but not worth a yellow for me. It was a yellow all day.
USA SaintsFan Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 Clear yellow and everyone could see that from where I was at in the Northam. Surely even his reaction could of warranted a yellow as well, as he aggressively got in Jones' face. In addition, did anyone get a view of the penalty shout late on? The whole chapel end went up in appeal from what I saw.
Lighthouse Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 From block 43 it looked like a coming together. Probably just about a foul for us but not a yellow. I was more annoyed about Virgil TBH First one - daft, didn't need to do it. He easily had the pace to get back and cover. Second one - he'd be better off just letting him score TBH. Was always going to be a booking, which pretty much meant we lost anyway and now he misses a 6 pointer at Everton.
VectisSaint Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 Because the awful ref bottled it when he realised he already was on a yellow. Even Pulis realised he should have been off and subbed him at half time. Disgusting referee today, but won't get the headlines because none of his terrible mistakes were major game changing decisions, just a catalogue of wrong decisions.
FriendlySaint Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 Never a yellow. Long accelerated very quickly and came from behind him. That would have been ridiculous to send him off for it. In the last game Redmond made a blatant last man foul outside the box and it should have been free kick and red card. Some of you need to either stop lying to yourselves or learn how to referee. You also need to put yourselves in the shoes of the individual players and what they are thinking. Long nipped in to get the ball just in front of Nyom and Nyom couldn't see him coming. Long accelerated very quickly. A second yellow card wouldn't have been harsh, it would have been wrong and ridiculous.
FriendlySaint Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 Because the awful ref bottled it when he realised he already was on a yellow. Even Pulis realised he should have been off and subbed him at half time. Disgusting referee today, but won't get the headlines because none of his terrible mistakes were major game changing decisions, just a catalogue of wrong decisions. Brunt is a good option for them at left back . It was a good tactical change as it gave them more pace on the break with McCLean. No doubt Nyom was on thin ice and that influenced his decision possibly, but you need to grow up and look at things objectively.
supersonic Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 Not every foul is a yellow card. It wasn't worthy of a yellow card. More to the point, how can someone with his limited amount of footballing ability be a Premier League footballer? Oh wait, we employ Gardos and Martina...
benjii Posted 31 December, 2016 Posted 31 December, 2016 It wasn't a yellow and the one he did get was harsh. He's an awful player though.
SaltashSaint Posted 1 January, 2017 Posted 1 January, 2017 It wasn't a yellow and the one he did get was harsh. He's an awful player though. He was given a yellow for persistent fouling. The yellow was handed out for his third foul. He then committed another two fouls, the last of which was on Long, which should have resulted in him being sent off.
John Boy Saint Posted 1 January, 2017 Posted 1 January, 2017 Played the man not the ball, anyone saying it was a coming together need a trip to specsavers, my view from the Chapel Long was off to get the ball and Nyom trashed Long from behind end of chat.......... Ref bottled it. VVD was easy as it was late in the game, just like Foster was warned in the first half at length for time wasting, then spoken to again second half. Frasers Yellows he has been warned then pinged the second time.
Chez Posted 1 January, 2017 Posted 1 January, 2017 Not every foul is a yellow card. It wasn't worthy of a yellow card. More to the point, how can someone with his limited amount of footballing ability be a Premier League footballer? Oh wait, we employ Gardos and Martina...Nyom makes Martina look gifted. He (Nyom) is the Ali dia of the current day. Woeful.
IN MY DAY Posted 1 January, 2017 Posted 1 January, 2017 Nyom should of been booked first half when he tried to float the ball forward with his wrong foot. It was like 1st day at 'the other foot' practise class, fkin embarrassing for a professional player. Even he laughed with a 'can I try that again face'
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now