ALWAYS_SFC Posted 13 December, 2016 Share Posted 13 December, 2016 No I don't think Batman gets invited to parties... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg Posted 13 December, 2016 Share Posted 13 December, 2016 ALWAYS would be there....the irritating brother (aged 14) that still thinks Santa is real and interpts the adult conversation as he wants to play connect 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 13 December, 2016 Share Posted 13 December, 2016 ALWAYS would be there....the irritating brother (aged 14) that still thinks Santa is real and interpts the adult conversation as he wants to play connect 4 Which name would you use to confirm your attendance, be careful as no one likes you as any of them, so in order to get an invite you would have to create yet another new persona Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
austsaint Posted 13 December, 2016 Share Posted 13 December, 2016 Which name would you use to confirm your attendance, be careful as no one likes you as any of them, so in order to get an invite you would have to create yet another new persona I'm suggesting Glasgow adopts "Gall Blather" as his new non-de-plume. He will be instantly recognisable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 13 December, 2016 Share Posted 13 December, 2016 I'm suggesting Glasgow adopts "Gall Blather" as his new non-de-plume. He will be instantly recognisable. love it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
verlaine1979 Posted 13 December, 2016 Share Posted 13 December, 2016 Did we really switch to 4-2-3-1 on Sunday? Mostly it looked like we were still trying to play 4-3-3, but whoever was meant to be playing as the right hand of the front three (Boufal while he was on, presumably) just decided to spend more time in the middle than out wide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 13 December, 2016 Share Posted 13 December, 2016 Did we really switch to 4-2-3-1 on Sunday? Mostly it looked like we were still trying to play 4-3-3, but whoever was meant to be playing as the right hand of the front three (Boufal while he was on, presumably) just decided to spend more time in the middle than out wide. It looked to me like Ward Prowse played wider and further forward, in general, in the second half and Boufal moved inside a bit. Redmond floated around but tended to make runs on the left. So it was a sort of 4231. I definitely thought we changed shape, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 13 December, 2016 Share Posted 13 December, 2016 It looked to me like Ward Prowse played wider and further forward, in general, in the second half and Boufal moved inside a bit. Redmond floated around but tended to make runs on the left. So it was a sort of 4231. I definitely thought we changed shape, anyway. Shown here using the team that played during that 2nd half, with the front players rotating - I reckon that's pretty good. (& fits in with some of the players on the bench too). ---------------Forster--------------- Martina---Fonte---Virgil---McQueen ----------Romeu---Clasie---------- JWP----------Boufal-------Redmond -------------Rodriguez-------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now