beatlesaint Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Screenshots were taken. Unless doctored he definitely removed us. and has now put us back........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint77 Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 I'm not making anything up - just posting a link. If you read the article it states he changed his profile pic from Saints colours to his Dutch immediately after the apology broke. Which appears to be true. It also states that he deleted the saints thing but it was later re-instated. That also appears to be true. It's possible to conclude that he's having a bit of a sulk or it's just one big coincidence. He changed to the Dutch colours last week when the internationals started Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saints foreva Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 I'm not making anything up - just posting a link. If you read the article it states he changed his profile pic from Saints colours to his Dutch immediately after the apology broke. Which appears to be true. It also states that he deleted the saints thing but it was later re-instated. That also appears to be true. It's possible to conclude that he's having a bit of a sulk or it's just one big coincidence. It's been the Dutch one for a couple of days now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Anyone???? Lots have claimed it on here..... So???? http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/813592/Virgil-van-Dijk-Liverpool-Chelsea-Antonio-Conte-Micky-Quinn-transfer-news-gossip http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/all-about/liverpool-fc TBF considering Liverpool's grovelling apology its safe to assume there had been contact between the two. Even if VVD hasn't come out in the press (which he wouldn't do anyway) and said it he has clearly had his agent working on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy_D Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 I'm not making anything up - just posting a link. If you read the article it states he changed his profile pic from Saints colours to his Dutch immediately after the apology broke. Which appears to be true. It also states that he deleted the saints thing but it was later re-instated. That also appears to be true. It's possible to conclude that he's having a bit of a sulk or it's just one big coincidence. Know for a fact he'd changed to his Dutch colours a few days ago. Splash hasn't changed from our Europa colours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGTL Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 just looked and whilst the profile pic has changed the word Southampton still very much exists in his profile. Why do people make this crap up ? It wasn't made up, he did remove 'Southampton' from there for a little while, and then it was reinstated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AR-10 Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Ask AR-10, he knows for a FACT what happened there. I feel he answers, I'll be more than happy to compare notes with him. "Crablungs." You have been full of **** from day one on this. Please do not come back at me, I don't know Virgil Van Dijk but I have met him many, many times. None of ANYTHING you said fits with the type of character he is. NO WAY did any deal get agreed and never had. Liverpool broke the number rule of opening their mouths at the wrong time and got caught. As for the "FACT"...yes I did say that and I did say it in block capitals, but it wasn't in reference to Gareth Rogers, it was a fact about Virgil doing a photoshoot about 3 weeks ago in the Staplewood dome. Are you saying you were there?..because I know there were 5 people there at the time and I know exactly who. As for Gareth Rogers, he WAS fired. That is the truth. The man was fired. Anyway, carry on you muppet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggie May Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Let him go with all the poor mercenaries we've had in the past. Not bothered, let's move on. Players come and go. I'm still reeling Magilton's move to Sheffield Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AK Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Know for a fact he'd changed to his Dutch colours a few days ago. Splash hasn't changed from our Europa colours. Fair enough that's good to know. As I said it appears to be true but then it's obviously not. Just more **** stirring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Id be hypercritical if i criticised Puel for snaking around and speaking to St.E then give VVD a pass for doing similar.... So i wont! His time here is almost up, just very very glad hes not going to Liverpool. Man C or Chelsea for 60m+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint77 Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 "Crablungs." You have been full of **** from day one on this. Please do not come back at me, I don't know Virgil Van Dijk but I have met him many, many times. None of ANYTHING you said fits with the type of character he is. NO WAY did any deal get agreed and never had. Liverpool broke the number rule of opening their mouths at the wrong time and got caught. As for the "FACT"...yes I did say that and I did say it in block capitals, but it wasn't in reference to Gareth Rogers, it was a fact about Virgil doing a photoshoot about 3 weeks ago in the Staplewood dome. Are you saying you were there?..because I know there were 5 people there at the time and I know exactly who. As for Gareth Rogers, he WAS fired. That is the truth. The man was fired. Anyway, carry on you muppet. Yep can back up both of the above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/southampton-liverpool-virgil-van-dijk-10580242 The Premier League will reportedly not take any further action over the matter with the apology sufficing to cool tensions between the clubs. annoying but not unexpected Why on Earth have the Premier League got a rule banning the tapping up of players if they never intend enacting it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Fry Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Just heard my contact at the club and Virgil has given his side of the story. All one big misunderstanding. Turns out all he and Klopp were doing was playing a game of Monopoly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaptopSaint Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 **** it who cares. Saints 1 Dippers 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Albert Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Whether or not VVD wants to go, Liverpool may have poisoned the waters for a move to another Premier League team this summer by publicly revealing his preference during Monday's co-ordinated media storm. Would any of the big teams in the Premier League go back in for VVD, when his preference of Liverpool over them became public knowledge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Virgil van Dijk and Liverpool - 'A complete and utter shambles' Ian Doyle believes we are witnessing one of the most embarrassing moments in a proud 125-year history http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/virgil-van-dijk-liverpool-a-13153435 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Why on Earth have the Premier League got a rule banning the tapping up of players if they never intend enacting it? oh I'm sure if it was the other way around and we'd tapped up one of theirs we'd be getting the full force of the PL law thrown at us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redder freak Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 As far as I can tell, we've done no such thing. They've put out a grovelling apology as a way to try to draw a line under it... We should continue to pursue this to the end, IMO. Looks likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tajjuk Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Know for a fact he'd changed to his Dutch colours a few days ago. Splash hasn't changed from our Europa colours. Which would suggest the other pics there have been doctored cos they have the saints kit and specifically refer to it being removed at the same time. People sh*t stirring IMO. There are still no direct quotes from VVD anywhere. A lot been said about what he's said, where he wants to go etc. but all seems to rumour and conjecture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AK Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 There is no way Liverpool would have issued an apology if it wasn't true. Direct talks between our board and their board and the revealing of evidence led to the statement by LFC. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/06/07/liverpool-row-southampton-overvirgil-van-dijk-proves-selling/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 You really are one. With your hit rate for ITK stuff, its safe to say we can typically take the exact opposite of what you say as the actual truth. No idea how something can be a done deal when the club who holds the contract have not even been spoken to. Read me back my hit rate. I literally don't care, it's an Internet forum. Raising your head above the parapet on here shouldn't ever really be that bigger deal. I shared what I was told, no biggie. I'd read my back my posts - I never said done deal though I did insinuate that the between VVD and Liverpool it was a definite goer. It's really no bother to me if people think I'm talking sh1te. Irrespective... Ho hum, didn't happen could work out for the better for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintquin Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Let him go with all the poor mercenaries we've had in the past. Not bothered, let's move on. Players come and go. I'm still reeling Magilton's move to Sheffield Wednesday. I'm still peeved about Steve Williams going to Arsenal. If Liverpool broke laws then they should be punished! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Fry Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Read me back my hit rate. I literally don't care, it's an Internet forum. Raising your head above the parapet on here shouldn't ever really be that bigger deal. I shared what I was told, no biggie. I'd read my back my posts - I never said done deal though I did insinuate that the between VVD and Liverpool it was a definite goer. It's really no bother to me if people think I'm talking sh1te. Irrespective... Ho hum, didn't happen could work out for the better for us. Up against the utterly delusional AR-10 (I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT) I am definitely on team Crabby. #crabarmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggie May Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Dean Richards' move to Spurs was far worse! #yobbos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suewhistle Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jun/07/liverpool-virgil-van-dijk-southampton-drop-interest I just saw this so came here for an update! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint-Fred Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Well done Ralph, Les and Co... Even if we do sell him at least we stood up for ourselves....and if we p'd off the plastic scousers...then even better! I hope that idiot Quinn on talk****e also has to apologise...(I know he won't but he is a knob) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goneawol Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 (edited) http://www.offthepost.info/blog/2017/06/virgil-van-dijk-removes-southampton-twitter-account-liverpool-move-falls/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+offthepost%2FTLAa+%28Off+The+ Post%29 This would suggest he was hoping to go. Doesn't want to play for Netherlands either? The Never stop working post was on 2nd June, wouldn't that show as 5 days ago? Edited 7 June, 2017 by goneawol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGalpin Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 @JWTelegraph: Southampton have not dropped complaint to Premier League. PL not involved in discussions today and not decided yet whether to investigate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChudSaint Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Maybe this isn't over yet then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AK Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Doesn't want to play for Netherlands either? The Never stop working post was on 2nd June, wouldn't that show as 5 days ago? I've no idea what that means but read post #1970 or a far more interesting link to a Telegraph article on #1981 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Up against the utterly delusional AR-10 (I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT) I am definitely on team Crabby. #crabarmy Appreciated. Happy to engage in an ITK-off if required for the lolz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_Ash Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Just heard my contact at the club and Virgil has given his side of the story. All one big misunderstanding. Turns out all he and Klopp were doing was playing a game of Monopoly. Proper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Up against the utterly delusional AR-10 (I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT) I am definitely on team Crabby. #crabarmy those good time girls eh Fry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Apparently we're intent on pushing forward with the complaint, and we have other PL clubs support. Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Southampton still fully expect the Premier League to carry out an investigation after they reported Liverpool for the “tapping-up” over van Dijk which could yet result in a heavy fine or more severe punishment. There is a reluctance from the Premier League to get involved and yet Mirror Sport understands other clubs have offered their support to Southampton and are looking for them to take a strong stance on the matter.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 (edited) No matter what has been said on here, massive massive lolz at Liverpool. Seems the PL aren't too keen to upset them though. A "reluctance" to get involved? From the governing body? That's shocking... maybe there is a house of cards that'll come tumbling down somewhere Edited 7 June, 2017 by Crab Lungs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 ... Where is that from mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Where is that from mate? Came from the John Cross article in the mirror. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/southampton-liverpool-virgil-van-dijk-10580242 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Came from the John Cross article in the mirror. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/southampton-liverpool-virgil-van-dijk-10580242 Cheers. I hope for once everything goes our way. Imagine a summer where we keep Van Dijk and Liverpool get a transfer ban thanks to us. I don't think i'd ever stop laughing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamplemousse Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 ... Those other clubs must be the other top 6 clubs, and Everton as well no doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Those other clubs must be the other top 6 clubs, and Everton as well no doubt. Stoke probably, seeing as they've already got Liverpool done for tapping up one of their youth players. Liverpool have a 2 year ban on signing youth players already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamplemousse Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/06/07/liverpool-end-virgil-van-dijk-interest-andapologise-southampton/ Jeremy Wilson article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Saints Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Apparently Liverpool were investigated for tapping up Clint Dempsey, Bayern reported them for Gotze contact and Fulham are refusing to talk to them about Sessegnon so no suprise our complaint has the support of other clubs. Wonderful stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pluto Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 Polite emails to rscudamore@premierleague.com demanding they take action on Liverpool FC for their tapping up of VVD. Liverpool's third tapping up scandal following this years youth transfer ban for tapping up stoke player and apologising to Fulham in 2012 about Clint Dempsey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobes8 Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 FA needs to grow some balls. Slap a 6 month transfer embargo on Liverpool if proven as that's the only way that illegal tapping up will end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Albert Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 The worst aspect of it for Liverpool is that they are already under sanction for tapping up a Stoke youth-level player. If Saints are pushing ahead with the complaint, this could get really damaging for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's There Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 To have a real impact- fine AND points deduction (3) with 12 suspended if any other infringement! Would set a great example! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 7 June, 2017 Share Posted 7 June, 2017 OMG - I got in the car and had talkSport on and the Liverpool callers in are incredible. The presenters are in shock at the delusion. The one currently on is saying that LFC have acted honourably, VVD wasn't wanted, Matip/Lovren would be better than VVD, LFC weren't in for VVD in the first place, SFC are mikey mouse and trying to get more money. Blah, blah, blah. In all the call ins, not one has thought that we don't want to sell, instead we are just trying to get more money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts