View From The Top Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 He may well still go for the £75m price tag that will make Saints "consider their position", but it won't be to the dippers, not for £100m, that's stone cold certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simo Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 No it wont because they have finally got the message it seems and closed the VVD thread on RAWK .............bout time ....lets move on They close it every other day and during matches for some reason! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamplemousse Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 No it hasn't It has Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toadhall Saint Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Hoedt is with SEG. vD is with Wasserman. I checked that a few days ago - just out of interest. [emoji6] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golac's Cunning Stunts Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 I think that's more or less that. The 'not definite' is probably down to the fact that at the start of this window you could have safely said that Neymar is definitely not for sale... it's very slightly possible an insane offer that we literally can't ignore comes in from someone other than Liverpool. Two things sprang to mind when I read that: 1. It still leaves a window open to sell if the right offer comes in 2. Saints would be stupid to communicate they are selling van d-ick before buying his replacement, for obvious reasons I like the statement and trust at the moment it's Saints intention not to sell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derry Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Sky reporting Man City bidding for Jonny Evans and Krueger saying We are not selling VVD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Sky reporting Man City bidding for Jonny Evans and Krueger saying We are not selling VVD. When you spend your budget for your defence on full-back's & realise you've forgotten to buy a centre-back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 When you spend your budget for your defence & realise you've forgotten to buy a centre-back... TBF, he would be upwards of £35m apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suhari Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/liverpool-transfer-target-virgil-van-dijk-not-sale-southampton-chairman-ralph-krueger-a7896866.html Krueger: "The new partnership has completely and wholly backed our strategy and plan and on September 1 people will see how serious we were and are." Wow. Strong stuff. Change of direction? We're a stepping stome club, but now we only let players go when it is right for us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 TBF, he would be upwards of £35m apparently. He would?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golac's Cunning Stunts Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 TBF, he would be upwards of £35m apparently. Bloody hell! Serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redslo Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Ralph Krueger has done an interview stating VVD will not be sold. https://audioboom.com/posts/6210154-listen-saintsfc-chairman-ralph-krueger-maintains-club-stance-that-virgil-van-dijk-will-not-be-leaving-in-this-window This is obviously part of an interview. Is there a way to find the whole interview on line? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 He would?! They are the figures I saw quoted when Everton were sniffing earlier in the window, would doubt if it's gone down since then...! He signed a new deal recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 the VVD thread on RAWK has been shut. No it hasn't It has Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 They are the figures I saw quoted when Everton were sniffing earlier in the window, would doubt if it's gone down since then...! He signed a new deal recently. Crikey. Then again, last time I saw him linked away was last season & the fee was £10m, so with this season's inflation, £35m is probably right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 It has Yeah, it has. They still think he's signing for them though. What a bunch of saps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy_D Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 TBF, he would be upwards of £35m apparently. Wouldn't surprise me. There are more Premier League clubs than just us suddenly enjoying 'we don't need the money'. £12M for Long looks like an absolute bargain now! We're probably still paying instalments on him... The playing field in financial terms in the Prem is definitely becoming more level. I'm sat here expecting us to turn down a world record fee for a defender. Even as I type that it seems a little bit insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whelk Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Remember when he was 16/1 to stay at Saints. Now 8/11. Brilliant though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Wouldn't surprise me. There are more Premier League clubs than just us suddenly enjoying 'we don't need the money'. £12M for Long looks like an absolute bargain now! We're probably still paying instalments on him... The playing field in financial terms in the Prem is definitely becoming more level. I'm sat here expecting us to turn down a world record fee for a defender. Even as I type that it seems a little bit insane. And in this window of craziness, what we paid for Lemina also seems an incredible steal. We still do it the right way..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 No it isn't. The plan was always to buy another CB regardless of whether or not Virgil stayed. it is what he alluded to. Whether you agree with it or not is another point of view Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redslo Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 https://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=335603.0;prev_next=next#new The actual quote is "LOcked for everyone's sanity .." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 And in this window of craziness, what we paid for Lemina also seems an incredible steal. We still do it the right way..... we might actually want to see him play a few times before we make that assumption he might turn into another Clasie or Hoj.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 And in this window of craziness, what we paid for Lemina also seems an incredible steal. We still do it the right way..... does it? remember when Ramirez was going to tear this league up!! lets wait a couple of week to see if he is any good.....I think he will be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redslo Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 we might actually want to see him play a few times before we make that assumption he might turn into another Clasie or Hoj.. I think it is two soon to give up on "Hoj" especially given his age. And with the current prices, he may be a steal even if you are right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restark19 Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Remember when he was 16/1 to stay at Saints. Now 8/11. Brilliant though Pretty happy I put a tenner on it back at 16/1 now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Ralphy interview Want to make a statement about the importance about holding your core we have to do this to try and reach the next level this summer was always about consolidation and continuity we have had the same message all summer 1 player out in Rodriguez and that was agreed with both parties (us and him) we are not done with transfers in this is a big statement and Virgil is just a part of the plan we will see on 1 Sept It is quite clear that we will not sell this window we have said it many times and will continue to say it until the window closes we look for the potential in each player the strength of contract put us in this position we will stay strong through this window Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Pete Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Two things sprang to mind when I read that: 1. It still leaves a window open to sell if the right offer comes in 2. Saints would be stupid to communicate they are selling van d-ick before buying his replacement, for obvious reasons I like the statement and trust at the moment it's Saints intention not to sell Yes, I agree. I think what the statement does is make it crystal clear that anyone who wants to buy Van Dijk in this window has to pay seriously big money and that we have no intention of selling unless that happens. There will be no reduction in what we will accept because of Van Dijk's antics. I also think this probably means we will go ahead and buy another central defender anyway (e.g Hoedt) irrespective of whether Van Dijk goes. This is sensible if we have the money available because it means we should get a better deal than if we wait until any Van Dijk deal goes through, but does make me wonder who we will sell/loan out if we do end up keeping VVD, as we will be overloaded with centre backs! Presume Gardos will be off somewhere, but we might also loan Bednarek out as he will surely slip out of contention for 1st team? Unless something is in the offing with Yoshida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puddings and Monkeys Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Yes, I agree. I think what the statement does is make it crystal clear that anyone who wants to buy Van Dijk in this window has to pay seriously big money and that we have no intention of selling unless that happens. No. It makes it crystal clear he will not be sold. I don't see how you can get your interpretation from the actual words of Ralph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farawaysaint Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 No. It makes it crystal clear he will not be sold. I don't see how you can get your interpretation from the actual words of Ralph. He equivocates a bit to be fair. He refuses to say outright he will not be sold if a huge bid comes in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 No. It makes it crystal clear he will not be sold. I don't see how you can get your interpretation from the actual words of Ralph.He's probably referring to the last two paragraphs in the Echo's account of the interview: Krueger was asked whether Saints would even turn down a ludicrous offer if one came in and replied: “I will tell you one thing - over the years we have spoken I don't give definite answers where there isn't a definite. “With all the knowledge I have today and all the information I have on my plate right now my answer is we are carrying our strategy through the summer and that's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 No. It makes it crystal clear he will not be sold. I don't see how you can get your interpretation from the actual words of Ralph. people refuse to take a statement at face value unfortunately. The fact Ralph will look a prize cock if we sell him now has escaped the attention as he could have kept quiet for two more weeks instead of repeating what the club have said since May. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baird of the land Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Very happy with statement from Krueger. Of course he had to caveat it with scenario of someone coming in with a simply astronomical bid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derry Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 He is probably sick and tired of the nauseating speculation, desperately fuelled by the ex Liverpool FC pundits and probably orchestrated in the background by the desperation of Saints firstly not dealing with them and sticking to the original statement that VVD will not be allowed to leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGTL Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Absolutely ****ing delighted that we won't be selling to those horrible wankers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Great news that he is staying, I would start him Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasoneuelllfanclub Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Great news that he is staying, I would start him Saturday.Not sure how to take this but in case you was actually being serious you do realise vvd hasn't played a single minute since getting injured in January (8 months ago)? Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Great news that he is staying, I would start him Saturday.I would reckon he' a fair bit off being match fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 I would reckon he' a fair bit off being match fit. He'll be alright, he's been training. He's been on the verge of being made the Worlds most expensive defender and playing Champions League football, I doubt he's been sat around the house eating pizza all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusic Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Not sure how to take this but in case you was actually being serious you do realise vvd hasn't played a single minute since getting injured in January (8 months ago)? Sent from my SM-A300FU using TapatalkAnd still isn't sctuslly training with the team. I'm sure he hasn't read what Krueger said and given up his idea of forcing a move. Wouldn't see him til late Sept IMO if he stays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manuel Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 If he doesn't start due to fitness, at least get him on as first sub after half time. If he's staying, get him on the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 And still isn't sctuslly training with the team. I'm sure he hasn't read what Krueger said and given up his idea of forcing a move. Wouldn't see him til late Sept IMO if he stays. Morgan didn't train with the team most of the pre-season in which he lost his head, then he was straight in on the first day. If he accepts it, he'll be back for Huddersfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derry Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 (edited) I see Peachey has been tweeting that Krueger is saying that by not selling players we want to keep, we are making a statement to move to a different position in the pecking order. Moving from being a club that sells to being a club that wants to get the best out of the players by keeping them. Up to now although Krueger has been saying this since May and Reed went on Sky saying the same thing, everybody thinks we are a bolted on seller. This is a strategy to put us in the 'it doesn't matter what the agent or the player says we are not selling'. In future if we say it, we are more likely to be believed. I wouldn't mind betting that Chelsea and Man City believed Saints so haven't bid, but Liverpool were too arrogant and presumed too much. As Liverpool have been the most troublesome over the years it had to come. Edited 16 August, 2017 by derry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pass the Dutchie Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 we have had the same message all summer 1 player out in Rodriguez and that was agreed with both parties (us and him) we are not done with transfers in Does that mean we're done with transfers out? Clasie? Højbjerg? Gardos? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint77 Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Does that mean we're done with transfers out? Clasie? Højbjerg? Gardos? If we have 2 coming in i.e CB And a mid/winger we need to unload 2 to make the 25 man cut could be wrong but thats my calcs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Morgan didn't train with the team most of the pre-season in which he lost his head, then he was straight in on the first day. If he accepts it, he'll be back for Huddersfield. Even if he accepts it, and I don't think he will until 12.01am on 1 September there is no way he will feature until mid to late September by the time he's had a couple of behind closed doors games and more importantly he's got his head back to somewhere near Southampton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redslo Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 I have transcribed Ralph Krueger's solent radio interview. It is quite short and obviously not the entire interview which I could not find to transcribe. If anyone can direct me to it, I will transcribe it. http://redsloscf.blogspot.com/ http://redsloscf.blogspot.co.uk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangermouth Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 I have transcribed Ralph Krueger's solent radio interview. It is quite short and obviously not the entire interview which I could not find to transcribe. If anyone can direct me to it, I will transcribe it. http://redsloscf.blogspot.com/ http://redsloscf.blogspot.co.uk/ Isn't your secretary extra busy with all the work you have? Or have you now hired another? ... . I won't put in an emoticon as with you it won't be necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appy Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Minute silence at Anfield for VVD upcoming then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avenue_Saint Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 Ralph Krueger has done an interview stating VVD will not be sold. https://audioboom.com/posts/6210154-listen-saintsfc-chairman-ralph-krueger-maintains-club-stance-that-virgil-van-dijk-will-not-be-leaving-in-this-window Ralphy's getting better at this statement lark. Very refreshing to hear and best statement to date. Positive stuff! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DT Posted 16 August, 2017 Share Posted 16 August, 2017 we might actually want to see him play a few times before we make that assumption he might turn into another Clasie or Hoj.. Unfair on Hoj. He isn't bad and will get better Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts