Saint Billy Posted 4 July, 2017 Share Posted 4 July, 2017 The fact that it has gone quiet with Lander again is more indicative. If Lander had the funds this would have been done ages ago. Hopefully its not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daft Kerplunk Posted 4 July, 2017 Share Posted 4 July, 2017 The fact that it has gone quiet with Lander again is more indicative. If Lander had the funds this would have been done ages ago. Hopefully its not happening. It could just be the transfer of money from Chinese to Swiss banks. The thought is that it would be easy but there's probably a fair bit of paperwork to do for someone/a company to pay an individual for an asset of this type from a Chinese point of view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daft Kerplunk Posted 4 July, 2017 Share Posted 4 July, 2017 The fact that it has gone quiet with Lander again is more indicative. If Lander had the funds this would have been done ages ago. Hopefully its not happening. It could just be the transfer of money from Chinese to Swiss banks. The thought is that it would be easy but there's probably a fair bit of paperwork to do for someone/a company to pay an individual for an asset of this type from a Chinese point of view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 18 July, 2017 Share Posted 18 July, 2017 It's been very quiet on the take-over front... Wonder if we are due some news soon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winnersaint Posted 18 July, 2017 Share Posted 18 July, 2017 It's been very quiet on the take-over front... Wonder if we are due some news soon? Don't you have something better to do with your time ffs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 18 July, 2017 Share Posted 18 July, 2017 Don't you have something better to do with your time ffs! Lol. Bad day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doggface Posted 18 July, 2017 Share Posted 18 July, 2017 Let's be honest, Lander has looked dodgy from the outset. Struggle to see how this would be positive if they ever get their ass in gear and complete. Hope I am proved wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sevvy Posted 19 July, 2017 Share Posted 19 July, 2017 Who's going to be taken over first us or the Mob down the road? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donatello Posted 19 July, 2017 Share Posted 19 July, 2017 Don't you have something better to do with your time ffs! Getting worked up over how someone else/a stranger spends their free time. Sheeeesh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint lard Posted 19 July, 2017 Share Posted 19 July, 2017 Now this I could live with..... https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/4052777/prince-andrews-ex-girlfriend-amanda-staveley-wants-to-buy-premier-league-team-with-huge-28bn-middle-east-fortune/amp/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
positivepete Posted 20 July, 2017 Share Posted 20 July, 2017 The Chinese group negotiating to buy Palace have pulled out due to being unable to agree a price, according to The Times. The rumoured price that Palace wanted was just north of £200m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 20 July, 2017 Share Posted 20 July, 2017 Palace is an interesting one. No other clubs nearby, at least by the standards of crossing London. Who is closest? Charlton and Chelsea/Fulham? To the south, its Brighton. Have often heard people talking about a new stadium and expecting to fill 50k. Why not? They have the catchment area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EBS1980 Posted 20 July, 2017 Share Posted 20 July, 2017 Now this I could live with..... https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/4052777/prince-andrews-ex-girlfriend-amanda-staveley-wants-to-buy-premier-league-team-with-huge-28bn-middle-east-fortune/amp/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk As the report says i imagine if you are just after a club, then Newcastle would be the most obvious one to go for with fan base and stadium size. We must be a goodish option too but not a stand out one IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericb Posted 20 July, 2017 Share Posted 20 July, 2017 As the report says i imagine if you are just after a club, then Newcastle would be the most obvious one to go for with fan base and stadium size. We must be a goodish option too but not a stand out one IMO. Personally i think Spurs will be sold sooner rather than later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 20 July, 2017 Share Posted 20 July, 2017 Personally i think Spurs will be sold sooner rather than later. Why ? Their owner is already of the mega rich of this planet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericb Posted 20 July, 2017 Share Posted 20 July, 2017 Why ? Their owner is already of the mega rich of this planet. Just been a few stories in the local press in London about interest in them after their stadium is built and mates of mine that are Spurs fans seem to think it's likely to happen too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 20 July, 2017 Share Posted 20 July, 2017 Just been a few stories in the local press in London about interest in them after their stadium is built and mates of mine that are Spurs fans seem to think it's likely to happen too. Well then they should be beware. ENIC and Tavistock are far solider than any fly by night Asian that they're likely to get as an owner. I really don't see that Lewis and Levy would have any interest in selling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 http://in.reuters.com/article/soccer-china-southampton-idINKBN1A60CL?rpc=401& Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delmary Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 http://in.reuters.com/article/soccer-china-southampton-idINKBN1A60CL?rpc=401& She's probably stalling to investigate other options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 (edited) She's probably stalling to investigate other options. Hopefully she read the same article that Lard posted up.... Edited 21 July, 2017 by doddisalegend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lickierambert Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 There's not been a single thing I've read that's made me confident in Lander or that the deal will go through. Kat's investment is going up in value year by year. She can't be that desperate to sell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charliemiller Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 A big thing in chinese culture is face saving .....this is a pre empt leaked to reuters to explain there non performance , rather than a statement from the club saying the could not complete because they dont have the funds . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sydenhampton Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 Palace is an interesting one. No other clubs nearby, at least by the standards of crossing London. Who is closest? Charlton and Chelsea/Fulham? To the south, its Brighton. Have often heard people talking about a new stadium and expecting to fill 50k. Why not? They have the catchment area. It's an interesting observation you make there, particularly as there's alot of money around the club all of a sudden. However, here in South East London we have 4 main clubs: Palace, Millwall, Charlton & Man Utd. The latter has the biggest level of support. Living firmly in Palace territory I can't see how they'd fill a 50k stadium or more to the point where they'd build it. To ensure decent crowd sizes they'd have to keep it in or close by to the Cronx (Croydon to you non locals) and I can't think of anywhere suitable other than green belt land which won't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pluto Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 Its all gone beyond a joke to be honest and Kat Liebherr needs to open her mouth and explain this total farce. Do they have the money to buy the club ? chinese sources say....... NO Do they have the means to improve the commercial revenue, which is the only way the club can improve, thats a big fat..... NO Following the Premier League saying this individual wasnt fit for purpose, why exactly has this shambolic takeover continued ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 Its all gone beyond a joke to be honest and Kat Liebherr needs to open her mouth and explain this total farce. Do they have the money to buy the club ? chinese sources say....... NO Do they have the means to improve the commercial revenue, which is the only way the club can improve, thats a big fat..... NO Following the Premier League saying this individual wasnt fit for purpose, why exactly has this shambolic takeover continued ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadoldgit Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 It's an interesting observation you make there, particularly as there's alot of money around the club all of a sudden. However, here in South East London we have 4 main clubs: Palace, Millwall, Charlton & Man Utd. The latter has the biggest level of support. Living firmly in Palace territory I can't see how they'd fill a 50k stadium or more to the point where they'd build it. To ensure decent crowd sizes they'd have to keep it in or close by to the Cronx (Croydon to you non locals) and I can't think of anywhere suitable other than green belt land which won't happen. I'm with you re Palace. I lived in the area for many years and whilst they have a solid support base, many of the locals support the likes of Arsenal, Chelsea. Man Utd etc. I cant see them being a 50k club anytime soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pluto Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 Yeah ,a takeover like this is clearly something to laugh at you plum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hutch Posted 21 July, 2017 Share Posted 21 July, 2017 Can I join in too? Its all gone beyond a joke to be honest and Kat Liebherr needs to open her mouth and explain this total farce. Do they have the money to buy the club ? chinese sources say....... NO Do they have the means to improve the commercial revenue, which is the only way the club can improve, thats a big fat..... NO Following the Premier League saying this individual wasnt fit for purpose, why exactly has this shambolic takeover continued ? :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/15430070.Optimism_fading_over_Saints_takeover/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 Really wonder how much this time-wasting bullshine has f**cked up our on-field performance over the past year.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miltonaggro Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/15430070.Optimism_fading_over_Saints_takeover/ So, the only thing stopping Lander buying the club is the 'financial transaction' (the money) and the main reason for negotiations continuing is Liebherr's friendship with Goa's daughter Nelly (who we must assume is corruption / assassination free) - what a delightful mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 So, the only thing stopping Lander buying the club is the 'financial transaction' (the money) and the main reason for negotiations continuing is Liebherr's friendship with Goa's daughter Nelly (who we must assume is corruption / assassination free) - what a delightful mess. So Kat wants to sell to someone with money to takes us to the next level but Lander seem to be having trouble even scaping together the money to buy the club.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
landford.saint Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 So Kat wants to sell to someone with money to takes us to the next level but Lander seem to be having trouble even scaping together the money to buy the club.... From what I recall, from the very beginning Lander were reported as to be borrowing to complete this deal. Yes, I know big business is often done by risking someone else's money, not your own. However does not give me great confidence that Lander would have money to invest in team after purchasing stake in club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Saints Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 Really wonder how much this time-wasting bullshine has f**cked up our on-field performance over the past year.. The past year? Zero effect. The coming year? Some effect, as it will be delaying our transfer activity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tajjuk Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 They clearly don't have the money which asks the questions why are the club still bothering keeping this going? Her stated aim is to get investment to take the club further, Lander clearly aren't that if they can't get the funds to buy the club in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusic Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 Not necessarily Lander but we need something to happen fairly soon as very clear KL hasn't got any new cash to invest. To even stay where we are we will eventually nees to start spending a little more, plus keeping Staplewood up to scratch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SW5 SAINT Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 That says it all in stating that Liebherr has a wealth of £300m. That's a micro amount for an owner of an EPL club. No wonder there are no further monies for investment.................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 How much of their own money do club owners actually spend on their clubs these days? isn't FFP designed to stop them spunking their own money on players and wages. More sponsors and commercial income would be more beneficial, in terms of players and wages, these days than a super rich owner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 That says it all in stating that Liebherr has a wealth of £300m. That's a micro amount for an owner of an EPL club. No wonder there are no further monies for investment.................... Strange isn't it, after all these years where all and sundry have bandied about figures in the 3 billion + range, the owner has never dropped a hint that she has nowhere near those sums. I have been blasted on several occasions for trying to delude you all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farawaysaint Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 Strange isn't it, after all these years where all and sundry have bandied about figures in the 3 billion + range, the owner has never dropped a hint that she has nowhere near those sums. I have been blasted on several occasions for trying to delude you all... Why on earth would she respond to press about her personal wealth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
verlaine1979 Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 That says it all in stating that Liebherr has a wealth of £300m. That's a micro amount for an owner of an EPL club. No wonder there are no further monies for investment.................... Especially considering her 'wealth' presumably includes non-cash assets, of which Saints at £200m now make up the vast majority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 Not necessarily Lander but we need something to happen fairly soon as very clear KL hasn't got any new cash to invest. To even stay where we are we will eventually nees to start spending a little more, plus keeping Staplewood up to scratch. when you say "cash to invest", you mean `lend to the club' or `burn'. Either way, I struggle to understand why fans would want to replace a pretty stable owner with an unknown entity that, unless we are very fortunate, will simply take us into further debt. That is not investment, its just a change of policy in terms of how much debt the club carries . With all the TV money I don't see why we need an owner to `invest'. All we simply need to do is spend the £150m we get each year wisely. In my eyes, stadium and training ground redevelopments should be the only reason for us to go into debt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 No wonder there are no further monies for investment.................... Again the word `investment' keeps being used. But what does that mean to you? What are you expecting from the next owner - to give us cash that they never want back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 How much of their own money do club owners actually spend on their clubs these days? isn't FFP designed to stop them spunking their own money on players and wages. More sponsors and commercial income would be more beneficial, in terms of players and wages, these days than a super rich owner. Is Man City's spending based on Prem money, sponsorship and commercial income? I don't know, but I agree that owners shouldn't need to be expected to spend their money propping up a club when the income they get from TV etc is so huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 (edited) Is Man City's spending based on Prem money, sponsorship and commercial income? I don't know, but I agree that owners shouldn't need to be expected to spend their money propping up a club when the income they get from TV etc is so huge. I think Man city and Chelsea were the lucky ones their owners came in spent their own money establishing them in the Elite before FFP came in and made that much harder. I suspect their owners don't pump loads (or any) of money from their personal income into buying players and paying wages these days as they are making plenty from other sources these days. Edited 25 July, 2017 by doddisalegend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 (edited) Again the word `investment' keeps being used. But what does that mean to you? What are you expecting from the next owner - to give us cash that they never want back? That's what FFP lets them do. They just pay their match ticket (up to 30 million a season now) a bit more than the bloke in Row Z. Edited 25 July, 2017 by Window Cleaner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 when you say "cash to invest", you mean `lend to the club' or `burn'. Either way, I struggle to understand why fans would want to replace a pretty stable owner with an unknown entity that, unless we are very fortunate, will simply take us into further debt. That is not investment, its just a change of policy in terms of how much debt the club carries . With all the TV money I don't see why we need an owner to `invest'. All we simply need to do is spend the £150m we get each year wisely. In my eyes, stadium and training ground redevelopments should be the only reason for us to go into debt. Congratulations! You have just passed the "I'm not a Pompey fan" test with flying colours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edprice1984 Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 when you say "cash to invest", you mean `lend to the club' or `burn'. Either way, I struggle to understand why fans would want to replace a pretty stable owner with an unknown entity that, unless we are very fortunate, will simply take us into further debt. That is not investment, its just a change of policy in terms of how much debt the club carries . With all the TV money I don't see why we need an owner to `invest'. All we simply need to do is spend the £150m we get each year wisely. In my eyes, stadium and training ground redevelopments should be the only reason for us to go into debt. Would you class a Monkey Chicken Petting Zoo has stadium or training ground redevelopment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 when you say "cash to invest", you mean `lend to the club' or `burn'. Either way, I struggle to understand why fans would want to replace a pretty stable owner with an unknown entity that, unless we are very fortunate, will simply take us into further debt. That is not investment, its just a change of policy in terms of how much debt the club carries . With all the TV money I don't see why we need an owner to `invest'. All we simply need to do is spend the £150m we get each year wisely. In my eyes, stadium and training ground redevelopments should be the only reason for us to go into debt. This. The word 'invest' is overused and largely misunderstood by a lot of people. Think of it from your point of view - if you invest, what do you want back? In short, all investors want more out than they originally put in. Not many clubs have owner who are willing (or able for that matter) to bank roll them, they have to balance the books. We are lucking in that we have found prudent and competent owners who run and manage the club properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pluto Posted 25 July, 2017 Share Posted 25 July, 2017 The only way an owner could 'invest' in a club for players is commercial revenue, Liebherr invested a wack of money on staplewood as thats not part of FFP and she has slowly been getting it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now