Jump to content

Rumours of takeover/investment interest

eling-saint

By eling-saint,
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted

I became good friends with Saint David and Saintlee outside of the confines of this forum. Two decent chaps who got innocently caught up in the whirlwind of the takeover days IMO. I know their intentions were always sincere, no matter how people might want to judge those who played a part in the soap opera.

 

One thing's for sure, they were certainly interesting times!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hypochondriac

hypochondriac

Posted
Posted
I became good friends with Saint David and Saintlee outside of the confines of this forum. Two decent chaps who got innocently caught up in the whirlwind of the takeover days IMO. I know their intentions were always sincere, no matter how people might want to judge those who played a part in the soap opera.

 

One thing's for sure, they were certainly interesting times!

Saint David spoke to me on the phone and was bigging up his involvement in it all. I'm sure he was duped but he wanted the recognition when it was happening so he had to be prepared to accept the ridicule when it all turned out to be a hoax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Monk

Monk

Posted
Posted
Wonder how much of an impact this potential takeover could be having on any news around management?

 

If the club is keeping Puel, then clearly there is no news necessary but the club are savvy enough to release a statement following the review, thanking us fans, we had a trip to Wembley and lets kick on next year under Puel bla bla.

 

?LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
I became good friends with Saint David and Saintlee outside of the confines of this forum. Two decent chaps who got innocently caught up in the whirlwind of the takeover days IMO. I know their intentions were always sincere, no matter how people might want to judge those who played a part in the soap opera.

 

One thing's for sure, they were certainly interesting times!

 

An entire summer, and most of the following season pressing F5 as I remember..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hutch

hutch

Posted
Posted
But presumably you see that there's a difference between choosing to take profit/money out of the club, and being obliged to in order to not default on a loan of a few hundred million?

Somebody posted that it would be against PL rules, which is rubbish. I don't like the idea, but that is not what was being discussed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Delmary

Delmary

Posted
Posted

tariq panja (@tariqpanja)

23/06/2017, 10:40

If I was a Southampton fan I'd be wondering why it's taking so long for Lander to complete deal given EPL tests passed ages ago. Cash prob?

 

I think this is the guy that originally broke the takeover story back in Nov (????)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toadhall Saint

Toadhall Saint

Posted
Posted
tariq panja (@tariqpanja)

23/06/2017, 10:40

If I was a Southampton fan I'd be wondering why it's taking so long for Lander to complete deal given EPL tests passed ages ago. Cash prob?

 

I think this is the guy that originally broke the takeover story back in Nov (????)

 

If they ain't got the cash it won't happen. Not sure what he's getting at tbh - most on here are happy in the main with the club as it is from an ownership perspective

Link to comment
Share on other sites
simo

simo

Posted
Posted
If they ain't got the cash it won't happen. Not sure what he's getting at tbh - most on here are happy in the main with the club as it is from an ownership perspective

 

Talk****e on about the Milan clubs worrying about a ruling China has made about foreign investment based on borrowing against Chinese assets, didn't really catch the whole thing but never mentioned saints at all .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gorgiesaint

Gorgiesaint

Posted
Posted
If they ain't got the cash it won't happen. Not sure what he's getting at tbh - most on here are happy in the main with the club as it is from an ownership perspective

 

Probably that it shouldn't take them so long to source the funds, and if they're that skint then Kat should have pulled the plug on the deal. If they end up borrowing the money from somewhere then we end up with owners with no cash and lots of debt. Not in the best interests of the club I would say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toadhall Saint

Toadhall Saint

Posted
Posted
Probably that it shouldn't take them so long to source the funds, and if they're that skint then Kat should have pulled the plug on the deal. If they end up borrowing the money from somewhere then we end up with owners with no cash and lots of debt. Not in the best interests of the club I would say.

 

Hadn't thought of it that way. Yep not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SaintRichmond

SaintRichmond

Posted
Posted
tariq panja (@tariqpanja)

23/06/2017, 10:40

If I was a Southampton fan I'd be wondering why it's taking so long for Lander to complete deal given EPL tests passed ages ago. Cash prob?

 

Lander is waiting for SISU to release some funds .............. Problem is, they want the $ 99.50 in ONE payment

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
Posted
tariq panja (@tariqpanja)

23/06/2017, 10:40

If I was a Southampton fan I'd be wondering why it's taking so long for Lander to complete deal given EPL tests passed ages ago. Cash prob?

 

I think this is the guy that originally broke the takeover story back in Nov (????)

 

Yeah, that's the bloke. Good spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CB Fry

CB Fry

Posted
Posted
Lander is waiting for SISU to release some funds .............. Problem is, they want the $ 99.50 in ONE payment

Funny you should mention SISU isn't it, as some of us remember your keyboard thumping caps-lock hrld down raging FURY AND ANGER that we didn't sell to them way back when.

 

SISU were the saviours of the club who were going to INVEST IN THE TEAM remember and you were their biggest fanboy weren't you, swivel eyes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman

Posted
Posted
That happened incredibly recently too. Who are some of the other people (besides Ralph) who are now directors?

 

It's all on there;

GREENWELL, Tim - Secretary

KRUEGER, Ralph - Director

REED, Leslie Arnold - Director

SEMMENS, Martin - Director

STEELE, Toby Andrew Murray - Director

THOMAS, David - Director

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Weston Saint

Weston Saint

Posted
Posted

They have all been at Southampton FC for a while.

 

Tim Greenwell was Legal now Company Secretary

Toby Steele was Company Secretary before Greenwell

David Thomas is Commercial Director

Martin Semmens is Chief Commercial Director

 

Nothing particularly changed. ST MARY'S FOOTBALL GROUP LIMITED is the holding company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
Posted
It's all on there;

GREENWELL, Tim - Secretary

KRUEGER, Ralph - Director

REED, Leslie Arnold - Director

SEMMENS, Martin - Director

STEELE, Toby Andrew Murray - Director

THOMAS, David - Director

 

I could read their names, I was just trying to work out if any of them had any links to Lander.

 

Weston has provided the answer above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman

Posted
Posted
I could read their names, I was just trying to work out if any of them had any links to Lander.

 

No. Have a look at their history and other directorships - they've all been around a while. As I said, it was more unusual that Katrina was a director of the football club in the first place - she's still director at DMWSL 612 LIMITED - the parent company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
They have all been at Southampton FC for a while.

 

Nothing particularly changed. ST MARY'S FOOTBALL GROUP LIMITED is the holding company.

 

Nothing changed ? But strange that such a flurry of activity should take place now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Badger

Badger

Posted
Posted
Why not. End of year is 2nd July 2017.

 

I was referring to the changes being made at a time a takeover is widely speculated. Perhaps of course the speculation is running ahead of itself and it's 'business as usual' under KL's ownership. Which is fine by me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted (edited)

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/15386780.Liebherr_resigns_from_Saints_board/

 

The Swiss owner will still operate as a director of Saints’ parent company, which acts as an umbrella for both the club’s football and non-football operations.

 

But she no longer has a place on the board of the football club itself, leaving major decisions and day-to-day operations to others.

 

The moves are unconnected with potential investment in the club.

 

Saints have been the subject of strong interest from Chinese firm Lander, but things have gone very quiet once again with the ball very much in their court to complete a potential £210m deal with negotiations having ended some time ago.

 

Regardless of whether that deal happens or not, the new structure, which is believed to be part of the reason for the departure of former CEO Gareth Rogers, will remain in place, with Saints believing it will help them progress more effectively.

Edited by trousers
Link to comment
Share on other sites
trousers

trousers

Posted
Posted (edited)

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/15386780.Liebherr_resigns_from_Saints_board/

 

The Swiss owner will still operate as a director of Saints’ parent company, which acts as an umbrella for both the club’s football and non-football operations.

 

But she no longer has a place on the board of the football club itself, leaving major decisions and day-to-day operations to others.

 

The moves are unconnected with potential investment in the club.

 

Saints have been the subject of strong interest from Chinese firm Lander, but things have gone very quiet once again with the ball very much in their court to complete a potential £210m deal with negotiations having ended some time ago.

 

Regardless of whether that deal happens or not, the new structure, which is believed to be part of the reason for the departure of former CEO Gareth Rogers, will remain in place, with Saints believing it will help them progress more effectively.

Edited by trousers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...