doddisalegend Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 I guess if Lander takes over, Les gets the boot and is replaced by no1 son-in-law or something there will be much rejoicing on saintsweb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuncanRG Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 I guess if Lander takes over, Les gets the boot and is replaced by no1 son-in-law or something there will be much rejoicing on saintsweb? Probably. People are utterly, utterly mad. I fear that, if they're not loaded with cash, the point of buying Saints is not to develop the club, but to make money, which could be asset-stripping. Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk Liebherr won't sell to asset strippers. If she would countenance the idea she'd have sold already, I expect. That doesn't mean we should welcome a sale with open arms, but all indications are that we're checking out buyers pretty carefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millbrook Saint Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 My worry is that with China trying to build their league, they may be snapping up premier league clubs in order to weaken them and the league in an attempt to turn their league into what the premier is now. Probably miles from the truth and paranoid but.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Albert Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 Thanks for the info, Shroppie. Posting ITK type info on this site can be a thankless task. I find myself hoping that your info is wrong. I'm less than convinced that they have enough financial clout to run a Premier League side. Count me in the "worried" camp. This does not look like an Abramovich style sugar daddy takeover so anyone thinking that we're about to throw ridiculous sums at new players should consider lowering their expectations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 it is typical of the life of a Saints fan, we had the only billionaire owner of a football club who wanted to make money and now a Chinese owner who seems pretty potless in real terms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 My worry is that with China trying to build their league, they may be snapping up premier league clubs in order to weaken them and the league in an attempt to turn their league into what the premier is now. Probably miles from the truth and paranoid but.... Yep that is miles from the truth and paranoid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 it is typical of the life of a Saints fan, we had the only billionaire owner of a football club who wanted to make money and now a Chinese owner who seems pretty potless in real terms What? Oh, yeah, woe is us. How rubbish it's been recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 What? Oh, yeah, woe is us. How rubbish it's been recently. I forget you dont get humour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKD Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 My worry is that with China trying to build their league, they may be snapping up premier league clubs in order to weaken them and the league in an attempt to turn their league into what the premier is now. Probably miles from the truth and paranoid but.... hahahaha do you also worry that you won't wake up in the morning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKD Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 My worry is that with China trying to build their league, they may be snapping up premier league clubs in order to weaken them and the league in an attempt to turn their league into what the premier is now. Probably miles from the truth and paranoid but.... hahahaha do you also worry that you won't wake up in the morning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pluto Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 Where is the commercial revenue that will be needed to take the club further ? At this moment in time not one single box has been ticked regarding this chinese outfit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spyinthesky Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 I understand your scepticism. I've never posted info like this before, and am only doing so now as I think there's a decent chance it's genuine. Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk Mirrors what I heard from a decent source in the City of London last month but without the 15% retained shareholding suggestion. Whatever happens I do hope it is for the good of the club but I am rather sceptical based on the results of other Far Eastern club ownerships in this country Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint 76er Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 Where is the commercial revenue that will be needed to take the club further ? At this moment in time not one single box has been ticked regarding this chinese outfit. Can't help wondering if this company is acting as some kind of 'front' for some level of Chinese government to invest in the PL. Previous media reporting had alluded to them being funded by the Beijing Municipal Council to invest in sporting assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lallana's Left Peg Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 I think at this stage you have to trust Katharina Liebherr that she has the best intentions and would have sought to do her own due diligence that she is passing the club over to capable guardians. I do not know anything about the prospective owners however *if* they have enough nous and savvy in the Asian market to dramatically increase our commercial revenue then that is a huge plus and can open up a lot of opportunities for us in terms of investment in our team. The concern is everything that comes with change and the suggestion that they are not cash rich themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plastic Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 No. It's Google translate doing a funny. The company in both cases is Lander (莱茵达 or laiyinda, if you want the pinyin, the official romanisation). Per Reuters, the Lander Sports Development company is buying out (it's not clear if it's in full or in part) Gao Jisheng, the main shareholder of the company. On one level, it's a completely internal affair and has no relation to us... Impressive comprehension Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shance Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 I really really hope they don't buy us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washsaint Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 Surely if this was all signed and sealed, Lander would have to make a statement to the Chinese stock exchange. As that hasn't happened I think the ITK snippet is probably incorrect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shroppie Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 Surely if this was all signed and sealed, Lander would have to make a statement to the Chinese stock exchange. As that hasn't happened I think the ITK snippet is probably incorrect. You're probably right and I don't have details. From what I heard, I inferred that there was agreement, not that it's necessarily been signed off. Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Convict Colony Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 No Money.....Their Chairman has a fair bit and works with the Venetian in Macau. Gao Jisheng, 62, chairs Lander Real Estate. His 59% stake (shared with his daughter Jingna) was worth $1.4 billion at yesterday’s closing price of 35.94 yuan after discounting collateralized shares. Last week, the company signed a long-term strategic cooperation framework agreement with Venetian Macau, a subsidiary of Las Vegas Sands, to explore the sports event market both in mainland and overseas. Its shares have gained more than 700% in the past year. Gao graduated from Shanghai Normal University. http://www.forbes.com/sites/russellflannery/2015/06/04/las-vegas-sands-partner-among-newest-china-billionaires/#20d55a871e1e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint 76er Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 You're probably right and I don't have details. From what I heard, I inferred that there was agreement, not that it's necessarily been signed off. Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk As far as I could judge, the translation someone posted above did appear to say that there was a Lander board meeting scheduled for 16 Jan to give final approval, as 17 Jan was the previously nominated date for the Chinese to make an official announcement that their asset purchase had successfully concluded (or not presumably). It sounded as though 17 Jan was always the date they were working to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pluto Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 No Money.....Their Chairman has a fair bit and works with the Venetian in Macau. Gao Jisheng, 62, chairs Lander Real Estate. His 59% stake (shared with his daughter Jingna) was worth $1.4 billion at yesterday’s closing price of 35.94 yuan after discounting collateralized shares. Last week, the company signed a long-term strategic cooperation framework agreement with Venetian Macau, a subsidiary of Las Vegas Sands, to explore the sports event market both in mainland and overseas. Its shares have gained more than 700% in the past year. Gao graduated from Shanghai Normal University. http://www.forbes.com/sites/russellflannery/2015/06/04/las-vegas-sands-partner-among-newest-china-billionaires/#20d55a871e1e rich bloke cant spent personal money on players these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a1ex2001 Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 (edited) Has anybody ever bought a football club to make money and if so who has actually made a profit? The answers to the above questions mean it's unlikely they are looking to make a fast buck or if they are they are stupid! Sadly it doesn't look like these are the dream owners who are going to push us into the mega rich league that many have been hoping for, personally I hope we don't get sold the period since admin has been the most successful and enjoyable in my life time the club is owned by sensible people doing sensible things yes we might never make top 4 but under the current leadership we seem unlikely to implode. Change isn't always a good thing! Edited 12 January, 2017 by a1ex2001 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 Has anybody ever bought a football club to make money and if so who has actually made a profit? No idea if he made a profit, but Milan Mandaric purchased enough clubs that I assume made him money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AR-10 Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 I don't claim to be in any way an ITK, but I have just heard from someone I trust that the deal is done, announcement imminent. Kat to retain 15% Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk The bit I've highlighted. How reliable is it you heard it off on a scale of 1-10? I honestly no nothing about this deal or any details at all. I've just been linked to this thread. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuncanRG Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 See, it's funny you mention that. I heard the Chinese investors had a big bust-up in the dressing room because they refused to play alongside Krueger, who's become a bit of an ego since winning the Euros with Portugal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 The bit I've highlighted. How reliable is it you heard it off on a scale of 1-10? I honestly no nothing about this deal or any details at all. I've just been linked to this thread. Thank you. Yes, we know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 As long as the grand designs aren't for asset-stripping Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk How many times do clubs actually get asset stripped in football? it is typical of the life of a Saints fan, we had the only billionaire owner of a football club who wanted to make money and now a Chinese owner who seems pretty potless in real terms Football clubs don't make you much money year on year, as a business investment they're high risk and low reward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jai27 Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 How many times do clubs actually get asset stripped in football? Football clubs don't make you much money year on year, as a business investment they're high risk and low reward. Exactly. Buying a football club is something the mega wealthy do when they run out of things to spend their money on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Convict Colony Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 rich bloke cant spent personal money on players these days. He can make his company sponsor our training ground (see everton) our training kit (see Man U) our actual strip (normal) and our stadium (everyone) so I reckon he can pump in 200mil a year easy with good accountants. Ok 200mil might be to high but enough to pay our wage bill by sponsorships so we get round FFP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secret Site Agent Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 How many times do clubs get asset stripped. I give you Coventry and SISU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shroppie Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 I give you Coventry and SISU Beat me to it. Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 Kat, Markus, Les and Nic C have helped build some solid foundations - now perhaps the time is right to pass the next stage to someone with grand designs? No doubt the Venky's and Tan spouted about "grand designs" when they first came in. I really really hope they don't buy us. Ditto. Would rather stay under the steady ownership of Kat, than chance it with a potential sino - SISU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a1ex2001 Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 I give you Coventry and SISU Have sisu actually made any money though or just royally screwed the club up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a1ex2001 Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 No idea if he made a profit, but Milan Mandaric purchased enough clubs that I assume made him money. Proably a really good example although he always bought broken clubs on the cheap invested enough money to put them in a position to be attractive to others and flogged them more like the leibheirs than this Chinese lot who will be paying through the nose for an established stable club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityRanger Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 The reasons Chinese businesses with no previous football experience may be buying into football explained in this article I read recently: http://www.policyforum.net/the-guanxi-of-football/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallagroth Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 The reasons Chinese businesses with no previous football experience may be buying into football explained in this article I read recently: http://www.policyforum.net/the-guanxi-of-football/ Interesting article and makes some sense, thanks for the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 The reasons Chinese businesses with no previous football experience may be buying into football explained in this article I read recently: http://www.policyforum.net/the-guanxi-of-football/ Interesting article and makes some sense, thanks for the link. Yes, interesting but not sure of the 'links' and the real tangible benefits of owning a club such as Saints (or Wolves or whoever), other than 'networking' on a large scale. Seems a flamboyant and modern (corporate) extension of inviting people to "my club" , or golf club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petts Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 Has anybody ever bought a football club to make money and if so who has actually made a profit? The answers to the above questions mean it's unlikely they are looking to make a fast buck or if they are they are stupid! Sadly it doesn't look like these are the dream owners who are going to push us into the mega rich league that many have been hoping for, personally I hope we don't get sold the period since admin has been the most successful and enjoyable in my life time the club is owned by sensible people doing sensible things yes we might never make top 4 but under the current leadership we seem unlikely to implode. Change isn't always a good thing! I would suspect the glaziers would make a little (cough cough) profit if they sold man u now. Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Billy Posted 12 January, 2017 Share Posted 12 January, 2017 At least the kit will stay red, maybe a few yellow stars here and there instead of stripes, but predominantly red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Jeff Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 I give you Coventry and SISU How have SISU asset striped Coventry then? How much have they made? Or was it just non football people trying to run a football club and failing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 How have SISU asset striped Coventry then? How much have they made? Or was it just non football people trying to run a football club and failing? https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2016/nov/05/coventry-city-sisu-southampton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2016/nov/05/coventry-city-sisu-southampton It may not be popular, but old Rupes only had the best of intentions for the club. Maybe unorthodox but not like Orange Ken. A bullet dodged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctoroncall Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 How many times do clubs actually get asset stripped in football? Football clubs don't make you much money year on year, as a business investment they're high risk and low reward. Cannot think of any, perhaps Sam Hamman with Wimbledon and plough lane, then he did something similar with Cardiff. Also what Bates did with Leeds, the chairman of Walsall has claimed the ground too. As long as you run the club well and then following examples above if you separate the club from the ground you can make money with rent and loans. In the PL there are riches to be had in the assets. If the glaziers sell their Man Utd shares, they would significantly increase their investment. Look at us, not a bad return if Kat does sell. It can of course go wrong, but that would be down to poor business decisions rather than anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a1ex2001 Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 Cannot think of any, perhaps Sam Hamman with Wimbledon and plough lane, then he did something similar with Cardiff. Also what Bates did with Leeds, the chairman of Walsall has claimed the ground too. As long as you run the club well and then following examples above if you separate the club from the ground you can make money with rent and loans. In the PL there are riches to be had in the assets. If the glaziers sell their Man Utd shares, they would significantly increase their investment. Look at us, not a bad return if Kat does sell. It can of course go wrong, but that would be down to poor business decisions rather than anything else. and in most cases can hardly be described as asset stripping, the biggest profits are to be had from making a club more successful and then selling it alla Kat and her family. Seperating the stadium from the club would send out a terrible message if the new owners were to do it and I'd then be bracing ourselves for a fall it seems to have ben the fate of all clubs that have gone that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a1ex2001 Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 I would suspect the glaziers would make a little (cough cough) profit if they sold man u now. Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk but they have hardly asset stripped the place and run it into the ground, the club maybe going through a lean spell but they have backed the manager with a lot of money and have been there a long time now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petts Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 but they have hardly asset stripped the place and run it into the ground, the club maybe going through a lean spell but they have backed the manager with a lot of money and have been there a long time now! I haven't me turned assets stripping, but whilst the glaziers haven't assist stripped, have they not used the profits to pay down the debt of the loans they used to buy the club? Also, where did the the money come from that they have spent on transfers? From their own pocket or again from man u profits? Whilst obviously that family enjoy sports and sport ownerships, I suspect it all has to work from a business/investment/profit perspective firstly. Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint86 Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 It may not be popular, but old Rupes only had the best of intentions for the club. Maybe unorthodox but not like Orange Ken. A bullet dodged. Lowe did a good job for saints all in all (with hindsight and on balance). He got us the ground - without which we would never have been taken over as an "attractive investment". He also pumped money into and really established the academy into the force it is today. He also secured us european football. It all went wrong in the end and the fall out wasn't nice... but he wasn't that bad a chairman in truth. Especially when you consider what else we could have had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faz Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 Lowe did a good job for saints all in all (with hindsight and on balance). He got us the ground - without which we would never have been taken over as an "attractive investment". He also pumped money into and really established the academy into the force it is today. He also secured us european football. It all went wrong in the end and the fall out wasn't nice... but he wasn't that bad a chairman in truth. Especially when you consider what else we could have had. Now you've gone and done it. The SWF equivalent of Godwins Law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgiesaint Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 Just listening to Sky Sports about the latest Chinese bid to sign Diego Costa from Chelsea, rumoured £80m transfer fee and £30m pa in wages so that makes £200m cost over 4 years. Would it make sense for the Chinese to invest in a Premier League team recognised for developing young talent to become a feeder club for the Chinese market? Could it be that our business model will continue but we'll sell to the Chinese market to make money which will leave the club? or invested to make us stronger in the Premier League? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrian lord Posted 13 January, 2017 Share Posted 13 January, 2017 The Chinese can't buy history and culture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now