Heisenberg Posted 21 November, 2016 Posted 21 November, 2016 Liverpool can go whistle we are NOT a selling club
S-Clarke Posted 21 November, 2016 Posted 21 November, 2016 Well that article is flawed from the moment they talk about him being a free agent. His deal expires in 2018.
SuperSAINT Posted 21 November, 2016 Posted 21 November, 2016 I'll be happier when McQueen signs a new contract. Don't want him to "do a Gobern" on us.
pluto Posted 21 November, 2016 Posted 21 November, 2016 Alex Crook ... he just makes stuff up and copies it from other made up articles ! He wouldnt have any clue who liverpool are buying and as for 'liverpool's leaky defence'
Shance Posted 21 November, 2016 Posted 21 November, 2016 If Liverpool bid for a Saints left back it won't be Sam McQueen. It'll be Bertrand.
Badger Posted 21 November, 2016 Posted 21 November, 2016 I'll be happier when McQueen signs a new contract. Don't want him to "do a Gobern" on us. Good point. Leaving after only a handful of games for us his career could easily go the same way.
Pamplemousse Posted 21 November, 2016 Posted 21 November, 2016 Hahahaha, £40M for both of them. That's not enough for VVD alone.
SuperSAINT Posted 5 December, 2016 Posted 5 December, 2016 Not the greatest source, but.... http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2016/12/04/gb-southampton-ace-sam-mcqueen-to-sign-new-deal/
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now