ALWAYS_SFC Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 By an absolute country mile. Just like Bertrand was better than any full-back we had when we got him on loan. Wilshere is a very gifted player, he needs a run of games to improve his fitness. Wenger has him in and out of the side even when fit. Reckon he could be a great loan signing. Perhaps but he is just one firm tackle away from another injury...
Saint_Ash Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Perhaps but he is just one firm tackle away from another injury... He'd do his cruciate coming to us and be out for the season. We can always see where the silly money is going - http://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/jack-wilshere/club-after-summer-transfer-window
Super_Uwe Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 What is funny on this thread is the number of posters who think he is rubbish and not good enough to play for us:scared: I don't disagree that his stock has fallen somewhat in recent years, but if we were able to sign him on loan then it would be a real coup. To suggest otherwise is bonkers!
Wade Garrett Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Perhaps but he is just one firm tackle away from another injury... Then he can go back. They're all one firm tackle away from another injury.
DuncanRG Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 (edited) Having him alongside Davis/Hojbjerg in the middle would be absolutely brilliant, but I'd be worried about upsetting the squad's equilibrium by bringing in a highly paid star on loan in what is by far our best stocked position. How would you feel if you were Ward-Prowse or Reed? EDIT: That's on the assumption that he would play in the middle of the diamond rather than the base. If we think he can shield the back four I'd be over the moon, because we haven't replaced Wanyama. Edited 30 August, 2016 by DuncanRG
Appy Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Having him alongside Davis/Hojbjerg in the middle would be absolutely brilliant, but I'd be worried about upsetting the squad's equilibrium by bringing in a highly paid star on loan in what is by far our best stocked position. How would you feel if you were Ward-Prowse or Reed? It's our best stocked position but I think only Hojbjerg and Davis are good enough at the moment.
DuncanRG Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 It's still early days for Hojbjerg. He looks good but will he settle and improve if he's pushed down the pecking order by Wilshere?
Batman Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 It's still early days for Hojbjerg. He looks good but will he settle and improve if he's pushed down the pecking order by Wilshere? He wouldn't be. Be honest. Wilshere is better than JWP, Romeu and Reed and probably Davis
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Then he can go back. They're all one firm tackle away from another injury. No they`re not but he is made of glass...
Appy Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 No they`re not but he is made of glass... Yes they are, any player is one tackle from an injury.
tajjuk Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 ^ yep, Hojberg is the least likely of any of the CMs to miss out. He'd displace Davis, JWP, Clasie and at a push Romeu (playing as deep playmaker at the base of the diamond could work against teams we should be beating, or at the tip against better teams) because when fit he's better than them. At his best he'd improve pretty much any midfield in the league, but that's the IF and why he's being loaned. It's a similar position to Jay Rod for us, Jay Rod back to his best would be a guaranteed starter for us, just like Wilshere would be for Arsenal.
DuncanRG Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 He wouldn't be. Be honest. Wilshere is better than JWP, Romeu and Reed and probably Davis Arsenal wouldn't send him here without some assurance he'd be in the starting XI!
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Yes they are, any player is one tackle from an injury. Yes and bad one but in Wilshere`s case it doesn have to be a bad one as he is very fragile...
Trader Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 He's all out of proportion - His legs are way too short. Something weird going on there.
Shance Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Anyone who thinks Jack Wilshere is average is utterly clueless. Get him fit and he'd be an excellent addition.
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Anyone who thinks Jack Wilshere is average is utterly clueless. Get him fit and he'd be an excellent addition. Guilty as charged then....as i am really not a fan...sorry if you dont agree ...
Give it to Ron Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Roma have enquired for him apparently so not worth getting het up about
Saint Benali Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 One of the most over hyped English players in history. Will spend the season in the treatment room and out getting high most nights. No thanks.
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 One of the most over hyped English players in history. Will spend the season in the treatment room and out getting high most nights. No thanks. Careful or you will be utterly cluless like me;)
CB Saint Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Anyone who thinks Jack Wilshere is average is utterly clueless. Get him fit and he'd be an excellent addition. And there lays the problem A Ferrari without an engine is still a sh ite car
ALWAYS_SFC Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 And there lays the problem A Ferrari without an engine is still a sh ite car Will look good on the drive way in front of your mates though until they ask you to start it
saintadam Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Would he want to go here? My guess he would anyways prefer to stay in London. Just read Crystal Palace is in for him..
shurlock Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Anyone who thinks Jack Wilshere is average is utterly clueless. Get him fit and he'd be an excellent addition. Utterly clueless is anyone who compares Mané to Titus Bramble trying to skill it past Messi.
Window Cleaner Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 If the big 5 start farming out on loan all of their players for whom they have no immediate role, the transfer market will collapse under the weight.
david in sweden Posted 30 August, 2016 Author Posted 30 August, 2016 (edited) I posted the OP ....just because I saw the item on a site, but I was surprised, not to say shocked ..... by so many mixed responses that came. I did a straw poll from comments up until now....and it looked like this. 20 people .....said he would be a very good loan acquisition and would take him (and especially if Arsenal subsidized his wages). 22 more said very negative things (bad influence, continually injured, etc) ......say no more ! 28 others made comments, but didn't express a definite opinion (they were the don't knows) One thing we can be sure of, that (in the unlikely event of him coming to us) ...for better or worse....he'd cetainly get " a lot of attention " on this Board. Edited 30 August, 2016 by david in sweden
cellone Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 He wouldn't be. Be honest. Wilshere is better than JWP, Romeu and Reed and probably Davis That's why he is at Arsenal and on what could be deemed as a phat wad of a weekly wage. I would prefer a decent player that can play most of the games than one that is amazing but only plays a few.
ally_uk Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Is a decent player however spens more time injured so he can go on the drink and smokes like a steam train
Lighthouse Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Anyone who thinks Jack Wilshere is average is utterly clueless. Get him fit and he'd be an excellent addition. He is average when he's unfit and recovering from injury. Which is most of the time.
cellone Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 I posted the OP ....just because I saw the item on a site, but I was surprised, not to say shocked ..... by so many mixed responses that came. I did a straw poll from comments up until now....and it looked like this. 20 people .....said he would be a very good loan acquisition and would take him (and especially if Arsenal subsidized his wages). 22 more said very negative things (bad influence, continually injured, etc) ......say no more ! 28 others made comments, but didn't express a definite opinion (they were the don't knows) One thing we can be sure of, that (in the unlikely event of him coming to us) ...for better or worse....he'd cetainly get " a lot of attention " on this Board. The only benefit for us is short term. For Player and Parent Club the long term positives are a given. I'm hoping this is twaddle as it would be ratifying our position as lovely little Saints. I can take the player sales and bi-annual coaching but wet nursing players for other clubs that we are competing with puts us firmly in our place.
doddisalegend Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 (edited) He seems to live off a reputation built on the odd good performance every bluemoon followed by loads of time in the treatment room and bucket load of bang average performances. A decent player who is massively overhyped. He also seems like a bit of a tit if I'm honest. Edited 30 August, 2016 by doddisalegend
nta786 Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 id take wilshere on loan if there was a potential option to buy tho We helped bertrand and we might be able to fix wilshere If the guy had minutes then he could be decent But i wouldnt get him on loan if we couldnt buy him at the end I dont want to help arsenal
cellone Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 id take wilshere on loan if there was a potential option to buy tho We helped bertrand and we might be able to fix wilshere If the guy had minutes then he could be decent But i wouldnt get him on loan if we couldnt buy him at the end I dont want to help arsenal With you on that.
Give it to Ron Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Alex Crook the guru says no.... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
adrian lord Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Unfit, and would likely stink out the training ground with bad attitude. For those reasons I'm out.
Shance Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Utterly clueless is anyone who compares Mané to Titus Bramble trying to skill it past Messi. Wow. That comment really has rankled you hasn't it, and to think it was a clear attempt at humour as well given he had a bad game. I was a mane fan. Let it go mate. Xx
ART Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Subject closed. He's accepted a mega package to go to AC Milan.
SuperSAINT Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Sky sources: Arsenal midfielder Jack Wilshere is considering loan offers from Watford, Crystal Palace, Bournemouth, Sporting Lisbon and Benfica.
SuperSAINT Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Our south coast Sherlock is on the case... Alex Crook @alex_crook Checked out rumours of a Jack Wilshere move to the south coast. Seems #saintsfc and #afcb both unlikely destinations #deadlineday Alex Crook @alex_crook Now being told #afcb HAVE registered an interest in Jack Wilshere #afc #deadlineday
John Boy Saint Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Good to see the reports that Glass Jack won't be coming to us to get in the way, (maybe if were managed by Woy there would have been a chance). Anyway lucky for him as having watched a few of those player funnies saints put up, there would have been a good chance that Romeu would have snapped him in the first 10 minutes of training.
Patrick Bateman Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Our south coast Sherlock is on the case... Alex Crook @alex_crook Checked out rumours of a Jack Wilshere move to the south coast. Seems #saintsfc and #afcb both unlikely destinations #deadlineday Alex Crook @alex_crook Now being told #afcb HAVE registered an interest in Jack Wilshere #afc #deadlineday I suspect Bournemouth's press team are trolling him
captainchris Posted 30 August, 2016 Posted 30 August, 2016 Average player, huge wages, always injured and a d!ck. No thanks. Couldn't agree more! Hyped up average player...
East Kent Saint Posted 31 August, 2016 Posted 31 August, 2016 Arsenal said they wouldn't loan him to a likely top 4 competitor , that's Saints ruled out then ! so more likely to be Palace (where you can still smoke in the grounds) or maybe Bournemouth .
georgeweahscousin Posted 31 August, 2016 Posted 31 August, 2016 I see no benefit in loaning Wilshere. Huge wages and spends 90% of the time injured. I think our board are far wiser than to risk a move like this. Will go to Palace.
Wrensup Posted 31 August, 2016 Posted 31 August, 2016 Him going to crustal or bummouth, to me shows the difference in mentality compared to Joe Hart. Seems like the east optu H to me instead of Benfica or someone else abroad.
Heisenberg Posted 31 August, 2016 Posted 31 August, 2016 Bournemouth would be my guess. Play the right kind of football and gets Jack out of London for a few months.
angelman Posted 31 August, 2016 Posted 31 August, 2016 Roma wanted him apparently, but maybe too short a time to sort. Does the loan window close today as well?
Dangermouth Posted 31 August, 2016 Posted 31 August, 2016 Him going to crustal or bummouth, to me shows the difference in mentality compared to Joe Hart. Seems like the east optu H to me instead of Benfica or someone else abroad. Agree. If Roma wanted him, he'd get a chance to show how good he really is and the type of league might allow him to have a full season unhindered. Guess he'd rather **** about than see if he actually is any good when not surrounded by the likes of Ozil, Cazorla, etc.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now