le_tiss Posted 9 August, 2016 Share Posted 9 August, 2016 http://www.football365.com/news/southampton-the-greatest-test-again obviously a better journo than the guardian write up thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Bateman Posted 9 August, 2016 Share Posted 9 August, 2016 It was boring. The Guardian was well written as well as balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baggytrousers Posted 9 August, 2016 Share Posted 9 August, 2016 It was boring. The Guardian was well written as well as balanced. Agree. F365 trotting out the Koeman left because of lack of ambition, Southampton glass ceiling claptrap that so many in the media believe. Guardian write-up seemed more balanced, knowledgeable and better written. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinger Posted 9 August, 2016 Share Posted 9 August, 2016 Agree. F365 trotting out the Koeman left because of lack of ambition, Southampton glass ceiling claptrap that so many in the media believe. Guardian write-up seemed more balanced, knowledgeable and better written. Quite. Their summation completely ignores the major factor of Koeman's massive pay packet. It's a shame, I generally rate F365. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascadia Saint Posted 9 August, 2016 Share Posted 9 August, 2016 http://www.football365.com/news/southampton-the-greatest-test-again obviously a better journo than the guardian write up thoughts? Ralph Krueger hired Mauricio Pochettino apparently. Hmmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Posted 9 August, 2016 Share Posted 9 August, 2016 As well as errors, such as the one high-lighted above, when you find something written that is factually correct but is expressed in away that will mislead it's reasonable to question the writer's intention. Daniel Story says that of the 26 players to appear for Southampton in the league last season, eight have left the club. We all know of three, Mané, Wanyama and Pellé. To find another 5 you have to include Kelvin Davis, who played one game, and the likes of Stekelenberg, Caulker, and Juanmi, none of whom had any future with the club. Who the eighth might be, I have no idea unless he's include Ramirez, who I don't think actually played a league game before he was loaned out. To quote a vague statistic to give the impression that last year's squad has been broken apart is a very good example of bad journalism where the writer decides first what story he/she wants to tell and then manipulates the facts to suit the desired conclusion. People who might be misled by the article are those who know very little about the club and probably care even less to I'm not sure that it matters; or why the writer even bothered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horley CTFC Saint Posted 9 August, 2016 Share Posted 9 August, 2016 As well as errors, such as the one high-lighted above, when you find something written that is factually correct but is expressed in away that will mislead it's reasonable to question the writer's intention. Daniel Story says that of the 26 players to appear for Southampton in the league last season, eight have left the club. We all know of three, Mané, Wanyama and Pellé. To find another 5 you have to include Kelvin Davis, who played one game, and the likes of Stekelenberg, Caulker, and Juanmi, none of whom had any future with the club. Who the eighth might be, I have no idea unless he's include Ramirez, who I don't think actually played a league game before he was loaned out. To quote a vague statistic to give the impression that last year's squad has been broken apart is a very good example of bad journalism where the writer decides first what story he/she wants to tell and then manipulates the facts to suit the desired conclusion. People who might be misled by the article are those who know very little about the club and probably care even less to I'm not sure that it matters; or why the writer even bothered. Jose Fonte? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolan Posted 11 August, 2016 Share Posted 11 August, 2016 It was boring. The Guardian was well written as well as balanced. Guardian and balanced aren't two words that generally go together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raynesparksaint Posted 11 August, 2016 Share Posted 11 August, 2016 As well as errors, such as the one high-lighted above, when you find something written that is factually correct but is expressed in away that will mislead it's reasonable to question the writer's intention. Daniel Story says that of the 26 players to appear for Southampton in the league last season, eight have left the club. We all know of three, Mané, Wanyama and Pellé. To find another 5 you have to include Kelvin Davis, who played one game, and the likes of Stekelenberg, Caulker, and Juanmi, none of whom had any future with the club. Who the eighth might be, I have no idea unless he's include Ramirez, who I don't think actually played a league game before he was loaned out. To quote a vague statistic to give the impression that last year's squad has been broken apart is a very good example of bad journalism where the writer decides first what story he/she wants to tell and then manipulates the facts to suit the desired conclusion. People who might be misled by the article are those who know very little about the club and probably care even less to I'm not sure that it matters; or why the writer even bothered. Ramirez came on as sub v Liverpool away... set up Mane's goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now