Jump to content

Saints Web Definitely Not Official Second Referendum  

221 members have voted

  1. 1. Saints Web Definitely Not Official Second Referendum

    • Leave Before - Leave Now
      46
    • Leave Before - Remain Now
      11
    • Leave Before - Not Bothered Now
      2
    • Remain Before - Remain Now
      129
    • Remain Before - Leave Now
      8
    • Remain Before - Not Bothered Now
      1
    • Not Bothered Before - Leave Now
      3
    • Not Bothered Before - Remain Now
      5
    • I've never been bothered - Why am I on this Thread?
      3
    • No second Ref - 2016 was Definitive and Binding
      13


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, Turkish said:

Very noble of you. We all have our different reasons for posting, some discuss football, some troll, some be use they’re bored at home or work, some to use it as a platform to show how lovely or clever they are, some because they think they’re solving all the worlds problems one post at a time. In truth it’s a melting pot of mediocrity where only the talented excel 

19 laughs now. 

  • Like 1
Posted

...and back to the topic of the thread:

Quote

European farmers have threatened to blockade supermarket deliveries and leave shelves bare as part of their biggest tractor protests against the EU yet. They are furious after Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, announced a free trade agreement with the Mercosur trading bloc of South American countries.

The deal, which farmers fear will leave the EU swamped with cheap beef and poultry, requires the sign-off of bitterly divided European governments which could veto it. Negotiations had dragged on for 25 years before Mrs von der Leyen swooped to sign the deal when France, the most influential member state opposing the deal, was engulfed in a domestic political crisis.

So, here's a question for the deluded Remainers still squawking about Brexit, while Democracy was the main driver: "Who the fuck voted for Ursula von der Leyen ?"

We are so well out of the EU, despite suffering from the temporary Marxist hell I warned you lot about. So, for the next 5 years, Trumpland here I come!

  • Confused 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Guided Missile said:

...and back to the topic of the thread:

So, here's a question for the deluded Remainers still squawking about Brexit, while Democracy was the main driver: "Who the fuck voted for Ursula von der Leyen ?"

We are so well out of the EU, despite suffering from the temporary Marxist hell I warned you lot about. So, for the next 5 years, Trumpland here I come!

Global free trade is bad now for you? It's so hard to keep up

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Guided Missile said:

...and back to the topic of the thread:

So, here's a question for the deluded Remainers still squawking about Brexit, while Democracy was the main driver: "Who the fuck voted for Ursula von der Leyen ?"

We are so well out of the EU, despite suffering from the temporary Marxist hell I warned you lot about. So, for the next 5 years, Trumpland here I come!

Good !

Just STFU and go.

 

Hopefully Trump will build his wall, and make such a good job of it it blocks transit both ways.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 14/12/2024 at 19:40, Turkish said:

18 laughs on one post say my world is full of humour so don’t worry about me. Maybe one day you’ll get one too

18???? Pathetic. You need to sharpen up. There is a post on the main site that has achieved 49 smiley emojis within 8 hours. 

You need to step up mate. 

😁😁😁

Edited by Tamesaint
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Tamesaint said:

18???? Pathetic. You need to sharpen up. There is a post on the main site that has achieved 49 smiley emojis within 8 hours. 

You need to step up mate. 

😁😁😁

I don’t do it for the glory, the likes or the lol emojis, they’re just a bi-product. I don’t do it to win the internet. There is so much spreading of bad news on here I’m just a guy assigned male at birth trying to give something back in my own way. I’m grateful for every like or lol I get as it means I’m doing something to make this world a better place 

Edited by Turkish
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Turkish said:

I don’t do it for the glory, the likes or the lol emojis, they’re just a bi-product. I don’t do it to win the internet. There is so much spreading of bad news on here I’m just a guy signed male at birth trying to give something back in my own way. I’m grateful for every like or lol I get as it means I’m don’t something to make this world a better place 

Is it possible to give a double like to this post??? 

Posted
1 hour ago, sadoldgit said:

You have also been a narcissistic, attention seeking 🔔end for years, but you seem to have forgotten to mention that. 😉

 

On 14/12/2024 at 17:36, sadoldgit said:

And the owner of the Ugly Inside decided that that forum would be a better place without him.

I could post that today is Saturday or just Happy Christmas and the usual suspects would still find an issue with it.

And despite being told countless times about the ignore function it seems they still fail to understand how it is used (and I am supposed to be the thick one).

 

On 14/12/2024 at 18:27, sadoldgit said:

Frankly I am sick to death being followed around by people with nothing to do other than have a dig, so yes, occasionally I have a bit of a laugh at their expense. They really need to ask themselves why they read and respond to my posts so frequently if they find them to be such a problem for them. Surely they should just put me on ignore and carry on in blissful ignorance? It is the same people and it has been the same people for years (apart from nic who is a recent addition). Why bother? I would prefer that they didn’t read or respond to my posts but unfortunately there isn’t a reverse ignore function. 

What is particularly sad is that they don’t realise that they all come across as needy stalkers.

Two unprovoked attacks in two days and then plays the victim, poor old SOG followed around by people who just wants left alone by 

what a bullshitter 

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
3 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Spain first. Good for them. We could do some of that. 

Imagine the howling if we applied to second homes based on the Spanish reasoning?

 

IMG_0275.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, whelk said:

Imagine the howling if we applied to second homes based on the Spanish reasoning?

 

IMG_0275.jpeg

Are they applying it to second homes? Or are they applying it to non EU citizens buying homes for profit? 

Posted
49 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Are they applying it to second homes? Or are they applying it to non EU citizens buying homes for profit? 

The latter clearly, however the reasoning could be applied to second homes in any country to counter ‘rich landlords and poor tenants’

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, whelk said:

The latter clearly, however the reasoning could be applied to second homes in any country to counter ‘rich landlords and poor tenants’

Well I wouldn't support that obviously. I'd definitely support British citizens getting preferential treatment in general though. That should include first dibs on homes. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 15/12/2024 at 09:18, Guided Missile said:

...and back to the topic of the thread:

So, here's a question for the deluded Remainers still squawking about Brexit, while Democracy was the main driver: "Who the fuck voted for Ursula von der Leyen ?

Let me help you … the MEPs voted for UvdL. The same sort of way the leaders of our own political parties are chosen.

How the President of the European Commission is elected.

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

So, ladies, it looks like the two threads, Trump and the EU are going to intertwine in a predictable fashion. 

  1. Trump threatens tariffs and the EU backs down, thus protecting US jobs.
  2. The UK negotiates a trade deal with the US, thus avoiding tariffs...thus protecting UK jobs.

As I posted at the outset of this thread:

Quote
  1. The U.S. and the U.K. should negotiate a free trade area based on the principles of national sovereignty and economic freedom.
  2. For both nations, the barrier to this goal is the European Union. Britain cannot negotiate unless it leaves the EU, while the U.S. has wrongly supported the EU over the sovereignty of its member nations.
  3. The U.S. policy of using Britain as its Trojan Horse in the EU is wrong in principle and doomed to failure in practice.
  4. The U.K. must ensure that its referendum on EU membership offers a real choice. There is no reason why the U.K., the world’s sixth-largest economy, cannot negotiate trade arrangements outside the EU.
  5. The benefits of an Anglo–American free trade area would be both economic and political. It would insulate the U.K. from the damaging effects of further EU regulatory interference and signal the two countries’ shared political commitment to their close relationship

Still can't argue with any of that and I have a feeling that unprincipled snake, Starmer will be following it in supplication to his new master, Trump, with Lammy and Mandelson bowing down behind him. 

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Guided Missile said:

So, ladies, it looks like the two threads, Trump and the EU are going to intertwine in a predictable fashion. 

  1. Trump threatens tariffs and the EU backs down, thus protecting US jobs.
  2. The UK negotiates a trade deal with the US, thus avoiding tariffs...thus protecting UK jobs.

As I posted at the outset of this thread:

Still can't argue with any of that and I have a feeling that unprincipled snake, Starmer will be following it in supplication to his new master, Trump, with Lammy and Mandelson bowing down behind him. 

If it so obvious and easy, why did the Tories not get it sorted ?

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Guided Missile said:

So, ladies, it looks like the two threads, Trump and the EU are going to intertwine in a predictable fashion. 

  1. Trump threatens tariffs and the EU backs down, thus protecting US jobs.
  2. The UK negotiates a trade deal with the US, thus avoiding tariffs...thus protecting UK jobs.

As I posted at the outset of this thread:

Still can't argue with any of that and I have a feeling that unprincipled snake, Starmer will be following it in supplication to his new master, Trump, with Lammy and Mandelson bowing down behind him. 

There is more chance of GM becoming a non drinker than a trade deal  between us and the USA. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

If it so obvious and easy, why did the Tories not get it sorted ?

https://www.indy100.com/news/brexit-no-deal-quotes-boris-johnson-david-davis-dominic-raab-8463121

UK economy 6% smaller than 2016 - let that be the Conservative and Reform UK legacy.

Although John is trying his best to close some of the gap just in alcohol purchases. 🍻 

Cheers - hiccup. I would add a vomit emoji for normal drinkers but I suspect John is well past the hangovers and sick stage. His house must be a right fucking mess though when he sobers up occasionally.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Tamesaint said:

There is more chance of GM becoming a non drinker than a trade deal  between us and the USA. 

No way the British will countenance US involvement in any scale in running and procurement of the NHS - given the dreadful state of the health systems in GOP states quite rightly. The public are not keen on food deals either from a food standards perspective - see chlorinate chickens and hormone-fed beef stories. Look at their obesity rates. That would enough to turn most of our citizens vegetarian if not vegan.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...