Jump to content

Saints Web Definitely Not Official Second Referendum  

221 members have voted

  1. 1. Saints Web Definitely Not Official Second Referendum

    • Leave Before - Leave Now
      46
    • Leave Before - Remain Now
      11
    • Leave Before - Not Bothered Now
      2
    • Remain Before - Remain Now
      129
    • Remain Before - Leave Now
      8
    • Remain Before - Not Bothered Now
      1
    • Not Bothered Before - Leave Now
      3
    • Not Bothered Before - Remain Now
      5
    • I've never been bothered - Why am I on this Thread?
      3
    • No second Ref - 2016 was Definitive and Binding
      13


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  On 11/12/2024 at 05:59, Tamesaint said:

More EU trading regulations coming into force tomorrow. General product safety regulations (GPSR). More paperwork for exporters. More cost for exporters when selling into the EU. We have of course had no say in drawing up these rules but will need to accept them. So much for our "sovereignty". 

This country really knew how to shoot itself in the foot when voting for Brexit. 

 

Expand  

Permission to exhibit my stupidy / naivety m'lud...

Having regulations to ensure products are generally safe sounds like a reasonably good idea to me, on the premise that unsafe products aren't a good idea.... But the bit I don't get is, if I make something in a country that is inside the EU and sell it to another country that's also inside the EU, why wouldn't I be adhering to the same or similar regulations as a country that makes the same product outside the EU selling into to a country that's inside the EU? Surely there's "paperwork" involved in adhering to any kind of regulation, regardless of whether your company is inside or outside the a given trading block? The ultimate aim here is to ensure products are "safe", wherever they are made, surely...?

In other words, what does a company outside the EU have to do differently to a country inside the EU to prove that their goods are "safe"...?

As I say, maybe I'm being as thick as those that voted for Brexit here.... ;)

p.s. my company produces software... we sell it to countries inside and outside the EU without any significant difference in paperwork.... (indeed, UK contracts are often more complicated than non-UK ones....) why can't it be that simple for other sectors...?

Edited by trousers
Posted (edited)
  On 11/12/2024 at 09:47, trousers said:

Permission to exhibit my stupidy / naivety m'lud...

Having regulations to ensure products are generally safe sounds like a reasonably good idea to me, on the premise that unsafe products aren't a good idea.... But the bit I don't get is, if I make something in a country that is inside the EU and sell it to another country that's also inside the EU, why wouldn't I be adhering to the same or similar regulations as a country that makes the same product outside the EU selling into to a country that's inside the EU? Surely there's "paperwork" involved in adhering to any kind of regulation, regardless of whether your company is inside or outside the a given trading block? The ultimate aim here is to ensure products are "safe", wherever they are made, surely...?

In other words, what does a company outside the EU have to do differently to a country inside the EU to prove that their goods are "safe"...?

As I say, maybe I'm being as thick as those that voted for Brexit here.... ;)

p.s. my company produces software... we sell it to countries inside and outside the EU without any significant difference in paperwork.... (indeed, UK contracts are often more complicated than non-UK ones....) why can't it be that simple for other sectors...?

Expand  

It depends on whether there is equivalence of regulation between those inside and those out. Prior to Brexit the UK complied with EU rules, so no issue. Post Brexit the UK has, or has shown intention to, roll back certain EU "Red Tape" and therefore can not, ( or will not ), guarantee to meet the EU's certification criteria. This, of course, works both ways, and the UK can, but currently does not, enforce reciprocal bureaucracy.

There is, in all likelihood, no difference between EU and UK products, but the UK has chosen not to "surrender" it's sovereignty to a bunch of unelected Brussels ( and Strasbourg ) civil servants by signing a bit of paper that states this.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 2
Posted

The European Court of Justice is primarily there to ensure that there is conformity in the Single Market. Some people in the UK believed that the ECJ was a case of ‘them’ telling ‘us’ what to do but of course the ‘them’ included ‘us’ at that time.

We can sell into the EU if we can prove that our products comply with their standards but and product testing facility has to be located within the EU.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/12/2024 at 06:44, Danbert said:
Expand  

Starmer really needs to man up and stop pussyfooting around the issue. He seems terrified of becoming a target for Farage and Badenoch for going soft on Brexit whilst more and more people realise what an unmitigated disaster it has been for the UK and our economy. Brexit isn’t going to be overturned any time soon, but we need to find ways to make it work better for us (and the members of the EU).

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
  On 13/12/2024 at 17:22, Lord Duckhunter said:

Make him stop :mcinnes:

Expand  

No one makes you read my posts. Why don’t you do us both a favour, and that goes to the other usual suspects, and put me on ignore? If you continue to read and respond to them it shows an element of either masochism  or a strange need to find and respond to triggering impulse on here. It is not healthy.

Edited by sadoldgit
Typo
  • Haha 2
Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 22:37, sadoldgit said:

No one makes you read my posts. Why don’t you do us both a favour, and that goes to the other usual suspects, and put me on ignore? If you continue to read and respond to them it shows an element of either masochism  or a strange need to find and respond to triggering impulse on here. It is not healthy.

Expand  

If “the usual suspects” had you on ignore it’d be only you posting on the last two threads you started 

Posted (edited)
  On 13/12/2024 at 22:56, Turkish said:

If “the usual suspects” had you on ignore it’d be only you posting on the last two threads you started 

Expand  

.... And that would be more enjoyable for all of us . 

Why don't you grow up and leave Sog alone? Your obsession with him and your need to reply to everything he posts makes you a sad, obsessed weirdo. 

 

Edited by Tamesaint
  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 23:12, Tamesaint said:

.... And that would be more enjoyable for all of us . 

Why don't you grow up and leave Sog alone? Your obsession with him and your need to reply to everything he posts makes you a sad, obsessed weirdo. 

 

Expand  

Probably worth pointing out that I went an entire year without responding to a single thing he said and he messaged about me multiple times. It didn't make a blind bit of difference if he was responded to or not. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 13/12/2024 at 23:12, Tamesaint said:

.... And that would be more enjoyable for all of us . 

Why don't you grow up and leave Sog alone? Your obsession with him and your need to reply to everything he posts makes you a sad, obsessed weirdo. 

 

Expand  

And deny him the attention?!

as hypo said I also ignored him for a while on several different occasions so he started to respond to my posts on various threads with his usual attacks, he loves it and he loves playing the victim

as for how I look I don’t care, I’m not here to be popular but that seems to be a be the case regardless. I’ve got 17 laughing emojis on a single post this week plus similar likes on a separate post. Not a personal best but shows what the wider forum things of me. It appears the forum is a better place with me despite what a few obsessed weirdos think. 

Edited by Turkish
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 22:37, sadoldgit said:

No one makes you read my posts. Why don’t you do us both a favour, and that goes to the other usual suspects, and put me on ignore? If you continue to read and respond to them it shows an element of either masochism  or a strange need to find and respond to triggering impulse on here. It is not healthy.

Expand  

Does the same apply to people who (pretend) have people on ignore, but then take them off, then put them back on again, then take them off again?

  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 09:50, east-stand-nic said:

Does the same apply to people who (pretend) have people on ignore, but then take them off, then put them back on again, then take them off again?

Expand  

This has been done to death mate. People put people on ignore so that they don't have to be bored by the stuff they post, but can take a look if they want to. 

On the wider Point of SoG. He is irritating AF, but many threads are ruined by people reacting to him and making the thread about him rather than the subject. It's become more irritating than SoG tbh. 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 10:20, egg said:

This has been done to death mate. People put people on ignore so that they don't have to be bored by the stuff they post, but can take a look if they want to. 

On the wider Point of SoG. He is irritating AF, but many threads are ruined by people reacting to him and making the thread about him rather than the subject. It's become more irritating than SoG tbh. 

Expand  

When I look at threads and can see he is the last one to post I don’t bother opening up. No debate just whining about right wingers or needless links to news stories we can all find should we wish. Mods need to give him his fiver back

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 10:20, egg said:

This has been done to death mate. People put people on ignore so that they don't have to be bored by the stuff they post, but can take a look if they want to. 

 

Expand  

Which is all well and good and is probably how the function is used by the vast majority of posters.  Those that trumpet that they've got someone on ignore only to lament them every time they make a post, or take them off ignore to directly quote them, are definitely in the 'concerningly weird' category of forum members.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 11:16, Weston Super Saint said:

Which is all well and good and is probably how the function is used by the vast majority of posters.  Those that trumpet that they've got someone on ignore only to lament them every time they make a post, or take them off ignore to directly quote them, are definitely in the 'concerningly weird' category of forum members.

Expand  

Exactly the whole point of the ignore function is that you ignore them. Not carry on reading their posts and reply when you want to. It’s even weirder to boast about it or to pretend you’ve got someone on ignore. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 11:26, Turkish said:

Exactly the whole point of the ignore function is that you ignore them. Not carry on reading their posts and reply when you want to. It’s even weirder to boast about it or to pretend you’ve got someone on ignore. 

Expand  

That's your interpretation, but other people don't use it in that way. I don't currently have anyone on ignore, but if a poster is irritating me, I've used it a couple of times to avoid being faced with loads of annoying posts from them. If I chose to look, there's nowt wrong with that. 

Multiple threads are being dominated by the same old predictable responses to a predictably dull / attention seeking post from SoG. He can't argue on his own, but he'll carry on if people keep taking his bait. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 13:17, egg said:

That's your interpretation, but other people don't use it in that way. I don't currently have anyone on ignore, but if a poster is irritating me, I've used it a couple of times to avoid being faced with loads of annoying posts from them. If I chose to look, there's nowt wrong with that. 

Multiple threads are being dominated by the same old predictable responses to a predictably dull / attention seeking post from SoG. He can't argue on his own, but he'll carry on if people keep taking his bait. 

Expand  

He’s become a joke figure now. No one is taking any bait, the last two threads he started the only response he’s got is people taking the piss out of him. Same for all the relentless shite he spams every thread with, no one biting, everyone pointing and laughing. 

Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 13:35, Turkish said:

He’s become a joke figure now. No one is taking any bait, the last two threads he started the only response he’s got is people taking the piss out of him. Same for all the relentless shite he spams every thread with, no one biting, everyone pointing and laughing. 

Expand  

You've described the bait taking process in action. 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 13:38, egg said:

You've described the bait taking process in action. 

Expand  

So he’s deliberately set out to become the biggest joke figure in Mongboard history? His sole objective it for everyone to be laughing at him? Do me a favour, if people were arguing back about when reform is such a great party for the future of this country maybe you might be onto something. They’re not they’re laughing at him. 

Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 13:48, Turkish said:

So he’s deliberately set out to become the biggest joke figure in Mongboard history? His sole objective it for everyone to be laughing at him? Do me a favour, if people were arguing back about when reform is such a great party for the future of this country maybe you might be onto something. They’re not they’re laughing at him. 

Expand  

His posts are designed to get a reaction of some sort - that's one purpose of SM and forums. He gets that. If people think that taking the piss in response adds anything positive to the forum that's a matter for them, but it doesn't. 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 14:01, egg said:

His posts are designed to get a reaction of some sort - that's one purpose of SM and forums. He gets that. If people think that taking the piss in response adds anything positive to the forum that's a matter for them, but it doesn't. 

Expand  

Glad we agree hes an attention seeking narcissist even if we don’t agree on why he does it. 👍

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 14:10, Turkish said:

Glad we agree hes an attention seeking narcissist even if we don’t agree on why he does it. 👍

Expand  

 

  On 14/12/2024 at 09:09, Turkish said:

 

as for how I look I don’t care, I’m not here to be popular but that seems to be a be the case regardless. I’ve got 17 laughing emojis on a single post this week plus similar likes on a separate post. Not a personal best but shows what the wider forum things of me. It appears the forum is a better place with me despite what a few obsessed weirdos think. 

Expand  

 

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
  On 14/12/2024 at 17:24, badgerx16 said:

"The forum is a better place with me".

 

Self praise is no praise.

Expand  

And the owner of the Ugly Inside decided that that forum would be a better place without him.

I could post that today is Saturday or just Happy Christmas and the usual suspects would still find an issue with it.

And despite being told countless times about the ignore function it seems they still fail to understand how it is used (and I am supposed to be the thick one).

Edited by sadoldgit
  • Haha 2
Posted

I’ve had Soggy on ignore this early this morning, and I haven’t read an anti semitic comment since, not read anything about lactating birds at work, or black female politicians. A coincidence? I think not….

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 14/12/2024 at 18:14, badgerx16 said:

And on occasion, SOG is clearly fishing.

Expand  

Frankly I am sick to death being followed around by people with nothing to do other than have a dig, so yes, occasionally I have a bit of a laugh at their expense. They really need to ask themselves why they read and respond to my posts so frequently if they find them to be such a problem for them. Surely they should just put me on ignore and carry on in blissful ignorance? It is the same people and it has been the same people for years (apart from nic who is a recent addition). Why bother? I would prefer that they didn’t read or respond to my posts but unfortunately there isn’t a reverse ignore function. 

What is particularly sad is that they don’t realise that they all come across as needy stalkers.

Edited by sadoldgit
Added text
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 14:10, Turkish said:

Glad we agree hes an attention seeking narcissist even if we don’t agree on why he does it. 👍

Expand  

I've never labelled anyone on here a narcissist, and wouldn't. 

Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 18:15, Lord Duckhunter said:

I’ve had Soggy on ignore this early this morning, and I haven’t read an anti semitic comment since, not read anything about lactating birds at work, or black female politicians. A coincidence? I think not….

Expand  

This latest round of nonsense started with a make him stop post from you, followed by the predictable. You then claim to have put SoG on ignore, so post another daft goading post. It's pathetic, and the forum is a hell of a lot worse for it. 

  • Like 3
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
  On 14/12/2024 at 18:14, badgerx16 said:

And on occasion, SOG is clearly fishing.

Expand  

17 laughing responses to one post, 17.

Come back when you’ve got anywhere near that. 
 

Edited by Turkish
It’s 18 now!!!
Posted (edited)
  On 14/12/2024 at 18:27, sadoldgit said:

Frankly I am sick to death being followed around by people with nothing to do other than have a dig, so yes, occasionally I have a bit of a laugh at their expense. They really need to ask themselves why they read and respond to my posts so frequently if they find them to be such a problem for them. Surely they should just put me on ignore and carry on in blissful ignorance? It is the same people and it has been the same people for years (apart from nic who is a recent addition). Why bother? I would prefer that they didn’t read or respond to my posts but unfortunately there isn’t a reverse ignore function. 

What is particularly sad is that they don’t realise that they all come across as needy stalkers.

Expand  

What’s even sadder is that you’ve spent your retirement trying to position yourself as the king of woke fighting injustice making the world better one forum post at a time and you’ve become a joke figure on 3 different boards.  That’s got to hurt. Devoting so much time, so much piety yet everyone just points and laughs. 

Edited by Turkish
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
  On 14/12/2024 at 18:56, Turkish said:

17 laughing responses to one post, 17.

Come back when you’ve got anywhere near that. 

Expand  

I don't partake in pointless posturing, or posting for effect. If garnering emojis is your fetish, bang on.

Edited by badgerx16
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 19:22, badgerx16 said:

As opposed to the man so starved of affection that he cherishes every smiley he "collects" on a football forum.

Expand  

In a world with no humour the man with a single laughing emoji is king. You’ll find your level, of that I am sure. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
  On 14/12/2024 at 19:40, Turkish said:

18 laughs on one post say my world is full of humour so don’t worry about me. Maybe one day you’ll get one too

Expand  

I get plenty from Nic, just don't feel the need to boast about them as it might be seen as taking advantage of the poor chap.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 20:19, badgerx16 said:

I get plenty from Nic, just don't feel the need to boast about them as it might be seen as taking advantage of the poor chap.

Expand  

Very noble of you. We all have our different reasons for posting, some discuss football, some troll, some be use they’re bored at home or work, some to use it as a platform to show how lovely or clever they are, some because they think they’re solving all the worlds problems one post at a time. In truth it’s a melting pot of mediocrity where only the talented excel 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 14/12/2024 at 18:27, sadoldgit said:

Frankly I am sick to death being followed around by people with nothing to do other than have a dig, so yes, occasionally I have a bit of a laugh at their expense. They really need to ask themselves why they read and respond to my posts so frequently if they find them to be such a problem for them. Surely they should just put me on ignore and carry on in blissful ignorance? It is the same people and it has been the same people for years (apart from nic who is a recent addition). Why bother? I would prefer that they didn’t read or respond to my posts but unfortunately there isn’t a reverse ignore function. 

What is particularly sad is that they don’t realise that they all come across as needy stalkers.

Expand  

Once again zero awareness and double standards. All of what you complain of others doing to you, you do to US. You do it to me all the time, mentioning me in your posts to try and get a rise. So, how about you accept that you are just as bad and you agree to stop it? Are you game to make this place better for all by practicing what you preach?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...