Jump to content

The New, New, New Manager Thread

St Chalet

By St Chalet
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Pilchards

Pilchards

Posted
Posted
Where is he then? Announcement please!

 

Been a hiccup as he took a wrong turning and ended up at Fratton Park.

Reed is currently at Eastleigh airport gate 4 trying to get him back.

ART

ART

Posted
Posted
Huge lobes

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]2072[/ATTACH]

 

Huge ear lubes are a sign oaroundng life. Looks like he's going to be around a long time!

kermitsaint

kermitsaint

Posted
Posted
Am I the only one who has a gut feeling that Puel really isn't the right man for the job?

Totally agree with you . We seem to want someone based on their ability to show off / advertise our academy prospects and work on a tight budget .

 

The football itself seems to be less important .

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

Beckenham Saint

Beckenham Saint

Posted
Posted
Totally agree with you . We seem to want someone based on their ability to show off / advertise our academy prospects and work on a tight budget .

 

The football itself seems to be less important .

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

 

What's that based on?

fish fingers

fish fingers

Posted
Posted
Totally agree with you . We seem to want someone based on their ability to show off / advertise our academy prospects and work on a tight budget .

 

The football itself seems to be less important .

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

 

You've just made that up.

kermitsaint

kermitsaint

Posted
Posted
What's that based on?

Gut feeling I guess .

 

Just odd to choose a manager who doesn't really stand out compared to quality managers who were interested .

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

ALWAYS_SFC

ALWAYS_SFC

Posted
Posted
Totally agree with you . We seem to want someone based on their ability to show off / advertise our academy prospects and work on a tight budget .

 

The football itself seems to be less important .

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

 

What's that based on?

 

You've just made that up.

 

An agenda

Saint_Ash

Saint_Ash

Posted
Posted
Gut feeling I guess .

 

Just odd to choose a manager who doesn't really stand out compared to quality managers who were interested .

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

Who would have been your choice that would have made the football important?
Saint_Ash

Saint_Ash

Posted
Posted

Surprised at 3 years, thought it might have been 5 for the 5 year plan, maybe it's a case of see how he does in the first year and offer another couple if he does well.

Beckenham Saint

Beckenham Saint

Posted
Posted
Gut feeling I guess .

 

Just odd to choose a manager who doesn't really stand out compared to quality managers who were interested .

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

 

But we're not aware of the criteria that the board were looking for, so we don't know that. They will have examined much more football played under Puel than any of us on the here have and have a real overall view of his history and management that we simply don't. Likewise, they may have done the same for the other candidates and everyone would have had different qualities, but if we have appointed Puel, then it's safe to assume that he ticked all the boxes that the board were looking for more than anyone else.

 

I would not be surprised if they ran comparisons of players at our disposal and players he has worked with to see if there are any similarities and if he'd be able to utilise their skills. Perhaps, again, they did this for everyone, comparing our current squads to those at other candidates disposals and the board again came up with the idea that Puel was the best fit.

 

Also, isn't it good that we operate under a strict budget? Failing to do so before nearly lost us our club, and it is the strict budget and continual financial growth that allows us to continue to expand areas off the pitch as well as on it that have made us so successful and lauded around the country. Living within your means is to be commended, not condemned and is a very weird stick to beat the club with, and also strange given that we clearly aren't averse to spending money where we see fit. It's not as if all our players are bought in on the cheap or on loans.

ALWAYS_SFC

ALWAYS_SFC

Posted
Posted
Surprised at 3 years, thought it might have been 5 for the 5 year plan, maybe it's a case of see how he does in the first year and offer another couple if he does well.

 

He`s no good apparently, well according to the experts here...so we can get shot cheaply... ;)

S-Clarke

S-Clarke

Posted
Posted

kermitsaint, the person who wanted Koeman out.

 

Excuse me if I don't take his arguments or feelings seriously what so ever. I'll pay more attention to my dog.

CB Fry

CB Fry

Posted
Posted
Surprised at 3 years, thought it might have been 5 for the 5 year plan, maybe it's a case of see how he does in the first year and offer another couple if he does well.

 

 

Is it just me who has no interest whatsoever in having the same manager for five years?

Mallagroth

Mallagroth

Posted
Posted
Is it just me who has no interest whatsoever in having the same manager for five years?

 

Nope i'm with you. If we have the same manager for five years it means we are plodding along mid table with no one wanting to either nick him off us or worth the risk of sacking.

kermitsaint

kermitsaint

Posted
Posted
So we can expect no improvements to the squad until Late July?

Noticed this as well . I guess Reed is choosing our players so the new manager doesn't need to ?

Doesn't leave much time to find and sign new players plus get them integrated .

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

Beckenham Saint

Beckenham Saint

Posted
Posted
Noticed this as well . I guess Reed is choosing our players so the new manager doesn't need to ?

Doesn't leave much time to find and sign new players plus get them integrated .

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

 

Unless they discussed potential targets during the Puel interviews and have put the wheels in motion on deals already...

alpine_saint

alpine_saint

Posted
Posted
Surprised at 3 years, thought it might have been 5 for the 5 year plan, maybe it's a case of see how he does in the first year and offer another couple if he does well.

 

Gone in 1 year if it goes sh*t, gone in 2 years if it goes really well :facepalm:

kermitsaint

kermitsaint

Posted
Posted
kermitsaint, the person who wanted Koeman out.

 

Excuse me if I don't take his arguments or feelings seriously what so ever. I'll pay more attention to my dog.

Funny , since he was chased out most people seem to be saying he was no good anyway .

I never rated him . Unlike some I'm not afraid to say it .

 

I doubt your dog pays much attention to you either

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

Toadhall Saint

Toadhall Saint

Posted
Posted
Every manager we have had has had to operate under a strict budget .

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

 

Can you define strict budget? I would have thought the budget would be commensurate to the size of the club and therefore the finances available. We are not Man U so our budget would be less than theirs.

Toadhall Saint

Toadhall Saint

Posted
Posted
Funny , since he was chased out most people seem to be saying he was no good anyway .

I never rated him . Unlike some I'm not afraid to say it .

 

I doubt your dog pays much attention to you either

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

 

You don't rate anyone do you?

kermitsaint

kermitsaint

Posted
Posted
Unless they discussed potential targets during the Puel interviews and have put the wheels in motion on deals already...

Guess it depends on who we look to bring in . Hopefully players to get the fans a little bit excited .

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

Webby

Webby

Posted
Posted
I rated Poch actually . Fantastic manager

 

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

 

His teams are knackered by game 30. Needs to work on that.

Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman

Posted
Posted
His teams are knackered by game 30. Needs to work on that.

 

Exactly this. This is his biggest downfall as manager, he works them hard, they work hard for him, if any team could sustain it they'd walk a league. Spurs should have been dead and buried by the end of the season, just like we should have carried on momentum and got a European place under him.

 

I don't necessarily buy the "no plan b" stuff, it's about not destroying the players so they can't do a full season. Let alone then expect 5 or 6 members of said knackered team to play for England.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...