Jump to content

Wanyama. As expected.


twopintsnilnil

Recommended Posts

Mauricio Pochettino is closing in on £11m deal for defensive midfielder....

 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/tottenham-confidence-victor-wanyama-transfer-8167258

 

You've got to love the London hacks haven't you? An article full of "it is believed that" and "we understand that" wrapped up and presented as gospel. It's guesswork. Throw out the same ****e often enough and eventually you'll hit something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got to love the London hacks haven't you? An article full of "it is believed that" and "we understand that" wrapped up and presented as gospel. It's guesswork. Throw out the same ****e often enough and eventually you'll hit something.

 

How can an article containing lots of equivocal phrases like "we understand that" and "it is believed that" be presented "as gospel"? How does that actually work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got to love the London hacks haven't you? An article full of "it is believed that" and "we understand that" wrapped up and presented as gospel. It's guesswork. Throw out the same ****e often enough and eventually you'll hit something.

 

Everything in the papers comes from somewhere. And that somewhere is usually a leak from someone involved on one the interested parties. In the case of Wanyama, it could be Spurs, the agent, or even us. The Mirror even has its own ITK now with Ronald and I'm pretty sure they started breaking the Everton/Ronald interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can an article containing lots of equivocal phrases like "we understand that" and "it is believed that" be presented "as gospel"? How does that actually work?

 

I would say that an article which begins with the wholly unequivocal phrase "is closing in on £11M defensive midfielder" - is, not might/may/could be, but is - only to then use multiple verbs which could be said to convey less certainty, fits the description above. You might disagree. Such is life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that an article which begins with the wholly unequivocal phrase "is closing in on £11M defensive midfielder" - is, not might/may/could be, but is - only to then use multiple verbs which could be said to convey less certainty, fits the description above. You might disagree. Such is life.

Except "is closing in" is equivocal - it doesn't mean he's definitely signing for them. Not gospel.

Edited by CB Fry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was hoping Arsenal might also be in for him to up the bidding war but it seems unlikely.

 

In the past I've been of the view we should avoid dealing with Spurs but if we did have to consider any bid from them our starting point should be that Trippier is part of any deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was hoping Arsenal might also be in for him to up the bidding war but it seems unlikely.

 

In the past I've been of the view we should avoid dealing with Spurs but if we did have to consider any bid from them our starting point should be that Trippier is part of any deal.

 

He's got 1 year left though, so it pretty much means we will take the best offer.

 

Arsenal have signed Xhaka & mentioned in links to Kante so assume interest in Vic is dead. Leicester might want him if they lose Kante, but I'm guessing Vic is set on a move to Spurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, was speaking heart over head, just don't want those f*ckers getting any more of our personnel. And i really, REALLY despise Tottenham!

 

I know, feel the same way.

 

But what if there are two bids on the table, one from spurs the other from Everton ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...