Jump to content

Would The Premier League Be Better If...


Lighthouse
 Share

Recommended Posts

... It were an annual competition. By which I mean we had one every calendar year with the break coming in winter not summer. I think it would be much more enjoyable having away days in sunnier weather with longer days. More beer gardens, fewer games called off because of frozen pitches (more of an issue in the lower leagues) and probably fewer muscle injuries. Probably better attendances too as I'm willing to bet a lot of older fans are put off by freezing cold winter games.

 

I know it's not going to happen, just asking who would prefer it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... It were an annual competition. By which I mean we had one every calendar year with the break coming in winter not summer. I think it would be much more enjoyable having away days in sunnier weather with longer days. More beer gardens, fewer games called off because of frozen pitches (more of an issue in the lower leagues) and probably fewer muscle injuries. Probably better attendances too as I'm willing to bet a lot of older fans are put off by freezing cold winter games.

 

I know it's not going to happen, just asking who would prefer it.

God no!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... It were an annual competition. By which I mean we had one every calendar year with the break coming in winter not summer. I think it would be much more enjoyable having away days in sunnier weather with longer days. More beer gardens, fewer games called off because of frozen pitches (more of an issue in the lower leagues) and probably fewer muscle injuries. Probably better attendances too as I'm willing to bet a lot of older fans are put off by freezing cold winter games.

 

I know it's not going to happen, just asking who would prefer it.

 

No.... World Cup, Euros etc etc etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the premier league would be better is if we cut out the cheating and all teams were forced to have equal budgets so that the rest of us aren't playing a support role to the glamour clubs and actually have a realistic chance of actually achieving something

 

would you think it would have been fair that when we were in league 1, we had the same budget as yeovil or dagenham?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the premier league would be better is if we cut out the cheating and all teams were forced to have equal budgets so that the rest of us aren't playing a support role to the glamour clubs and actually have a realistic chance of actually achieving something

 

Pure fantasy island though. The only way to achieve that would be an American style/MSL format where the league operate a system of allocating players so that no club has an advantage of financial clout. (Assuming I've understood the US system correctly that is). Wouldn't work here.

 

The other option to even out the system would be for the big 4 or 5 to bugger off into the European Super league they dream of, leaving the rest to play the domestic game. This has been motted for years though, although it may still happen. Talking of it 15 years ago and a Man Utd fan ( one who was actually from Lancashire as well) said he hoped it wouldn't happen because he would miss games against the likes of City (who were a lesser club then), Southampton and West Ham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the premier league would be better is if we cut out the cheating and all teams were forced to have equal budgets so that the rest of us aren't playing a support role to the glamour clubs and actually have a realistic chance of actually achieving something

 

Good luck to Leicester on Monday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the premier league would be better is if we cut out the cheating and all teams were forced to have equal budgets so that the rest of us aren't playing a support role to the glamour clubs and actually have a realistic chance of actually achieving something

 

That won't happen so long as you keep relegation.

 

Pure fantasy island though. The only way to achieve that would be an American style/MSL format where the league operate a system of allocating players so that no club has an advantage of financial clout. (Assuming I've understood the US system correctly that is). Wouldn't work here.

 

The other option to even out the system would be for the big 4 or 5 to bugger off into the European Super league they dream of, leaving the rest to play the domestic game. This has been motted for years though, although it may still happen. Talking of it 15 years ago and a Man Utd fan ( one who was actually from Lancashire as well) said he hoped it wouldn't happen because he would miss games against the likes of City (who were a lesser club then), Southampton and West Ham.

 

Close enough for the purposes of this discussion. However, all American sports leagues work on some variant of this process and there is probably no way to make it work in England, because, as I said, relegation would have to go. Also, a critical part of American sports balance is that there must be a way of allocating players that gives an advantage to the weaker clubs--in other words a draft where the lowest finishing club drafts first before the next season. I don't think European labor law would permit this--although perhaps the UK could implement it after leaving the EU. Also, American law allows players to be more permanently bound to their clubs. In major league baseball players are bound to their club for six major league seasons. This is on top of the time the spend in the minor leagues. There is functionally no reliable way players can compel a club to trade (transfer) them. On the other hand, players are less likely to want to move because their are no clubs that are inherently superior such that they have no shot at a championship without moving. My club, the San Francisco Giants, for example has won three of the last six world championships and is (depending on how you want to calculate it) the third or fourth richest club. But it wasn't that high on the list a few years ago. It got there by being successful rather than being successful by being rich. It seems unlikely that the richer English clubs will go for anything like this. Only if the bigger and richer clubs move to a European Super League will there be a fair and balanced competition in English Football.

 

Another interesting question is whether the Superleague would adopt American style balance rules such as a draft, revenue sharing, and a true salary cap.

 

Would the Premier League be better if..........

 

It was played with an oval ball.

 

Or,

 

Every time a team scores a goal, they lose a player

 

That is just crazy talk. The ball should be round, but much smaller, and the other club should gain a player whenever their opponent scores.

Edited by Redslo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've always like the idea of a Joker that you could play once in a season before any game. Any points from that game are doubled.

 

Wonder if Stuart Hall has any other suggestions as to how the game can be revolutionised? Maybe he should form a think tank with Adam Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... It were an annual competition. By which I mean we had one every calendar year with the break coming in winter not summer. I think it would be much more enjoyable having away days in sunnier weather with longer days. More beer gardens, fewer games called off because of frozen pitches (more of an issue in the lower leagues) and probably fewer muscle injuries. Probably better attendances too as I'm willing to bet a lot of older fans are put off by freezing cold winter games.

 

I know it's not going to happen, just asking who would prefer it.

 

Obviously - you're not a cricket fan, Lighthouse ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must be still at school then, if you can't remember 2005.

 

No I'm not and no I don't remember no Easter games in 2005. My point is, as you are probably aware, that Easter is like Christmas, traditionally a big deal for football, and to not be playing at all is just wrong.

 

i remember playing on Good Friday then Easter Monday young fella :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I'm not and no I don't remember no Easter games in 2005. My point is, as you are probably aware, that Easter is like Christmas, traditionally a big deal for football, and to not be playing at all is just wrong.

 

i remember playing on Good Friday then Easter Monday young fella :lol:

 

And the Saturday in between.

 

Proof of 2005.

 

http://www.statto.com/football/stats/results/2005-03-26

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cut the number of teams down to 18 in our league, re-format the league cup so less games for top flight teams somehow.

 

Great idea.

 

More time to allow our 'top, top players' to rest, and benefit our chances in European competions, and the national team. and even more meaningless but lucrative friendlies and tours to Asia and the Middle East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cut the number of teams down to 18 in our league, re-format the league cup so less games for top flight teams somehow.

 

Why?

 

The whole point of a professional club is to provide entertainment for a paying public. I don't believe that this entertainment shold be provided solely throgh the electronic media. A far better suggestion is to cut out the league stages of the Champions League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No more ridiculous than the OP.

 

our summer sport has been cricket for hundreds of years

 

Thank you. I've got loads of them.

 

How about making it in to a handicap? The Champions start the next season on -19, 2nd place -18 and so on to the play off winners who start on 0. Gives everyone a chance.

 

Or, if you go bust twice in 3 years you get relegated to L2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or maybe there should be a Springtime competition .......

.....for all those teams who don't make it through the qualifying /group stages of Euro competitions and teams who go out of the FA Cup in Round 3 and 4 and every team with an A,E, I O or U in their name ....and all teams who have at least one team shirt in Red or Black..with ties played on a two leg basis + extra time and penalties.

 

:rolleyes::scared::D:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or maybe there should be a Springtime competition .......

.....for all those teams who don't make it through the qualifying /group stages of Euro competitions and teams who go out of the FA Cup in Round 3 and 4 and every team with an A,E, I O or U in their name ....and all teams who have at least one team shirt in Red or Black..with ties played on a two leg basis + extra time and penalties.

 

:rolleyes::scared::D:lol:

 

Even when the match did not end in a draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why?

 

The whole point of a professional club is to provide entertainment for a paying public. I don't believe that this entertainment shold be provided solely throgh the electronic media. A far better suggestion is to cut out the league stages of the Champions League.

 

a common sense idea Whitey, but that's where the big TV income originates....

 

but did you read that the new FIFA boss wants 40 teams to be in final stages of future World Cups?....

 

I mean why not have all 208 countries in the competition ?....oops :blush: they do that already - don't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...