Jump to content

Terrorist Attacks - WARNING: CONTAINS DISTRESSING IMAGES


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 19/02/2025 at 09:24, east-stand-nic said:

That's odd? He seems to have disappeared, which goes totally against his claim to me that he always condemns such things.

That chutney isn’t going to make itself 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Don’t forget number 4 turned out to be a white Supremacist after all as although being a Saudi he once posted a criticism of Islam so a far right terror attack obviously. So never jump to conclusions about Syrian Algerian, Afghani perpetrators. 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, whelk said:

Don’t forget number 4 turned out to be a white Supremacist after all as although being a Saudi he once posted a criticism of Islam so a far right terror attack obviously. So never jump to conclusions about Syrian Algerian, Afghani perpetrators. 

Good point. That makes all the difference. 

Posted
1 hour ago, hypochondriac said:

Terror attacks in Germany in the past year:

@sadoldgit

20250223_153253.jpg

Why has one Syrian been labelled a 'refugee' whilst the other a 'failed asylum seeker'.  I assume both were fleeing the war in Syria so they must have been refugees, surely?  Why are Germany refusing to accept legitimate refugees?

  • Like 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Why has one Syrian been labelled a 'refugee' whilst the other a 'failed asylum seeker'.  I assume both were fleeing the war in Syria so they must have been refugees, surely?  Why are Germany refusing to accept legitimate refugees?

The "failed asylum seeker" was just that; he has originally arrived in Bulgaria from Syria, and appled for asylum there. Whilst this application was being processed he went to Germany and applied there as well. His German application was refused as he had already applied in Bulgaria, and he was ordered to be deported back to Bulgaria, but the authorities lost track of him.

Posted
17 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

The "failed asylum seeker" was just that; he has originally arrived in Bulgaria from Syria, and appled for asylum there. Whilst this application was being processed he went to Germany and applied there as well. His German application was refused as he had already applied in Bulgaria, and he was ordered to be deported back to Bulgaria, but the authorities lost track of him.

Apparently, it shouldn't matter and you can just keep trying in every country until you find one you like.

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

The "failed asylum seeker" was just that; he has originally arrived in Bulgaria from Syria, and appled for asylum there. Whilst this application was being processed he went to Germany and applied there as well. His German application was refused as he had already applied in Bulgaria, and he was ordered to be deported back to Bulgaria, but the authorities lost track of him.

Apparently, it shouldn't matter and you can just keep trying in every country until you find one you like.

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Apparently, it shouldn't matter and you can just keep trying in every country until you find one you like.

Where has that been said ? Refugees may pass through several countries, it is true, but once an asylum claim has been lodged, that is where they should remain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Regulation

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 2
Posted

So, SOG runs away from this thread having been proven an ass yet again. He had the audacity to tell me he does condemn such things, but I know for a fact he never does, he just spouts of some nonsense whataboutery to protect Muslim extremists from looking bad by saying things like, oh and whitey's never do this blah blah blah. And to think some people still stand up for him. And I am not referring to his second login in mental mickey.

  • Haha 3
Posted
36 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

So, SOG runs away from this thread having been proven an ass yet again. He had the audacity to tell me he does condemn such things, but I know for a fact he never does, he just spouts of some nonsense whataboutery to protect Muslim extremists from looking bad by saying things like, oh and whitey's never do this blah blah blah. And to think some people still stand up for him. And I am not referring to his second login in mental mickey.

TDMickey might be an alternative login, but I reckon you are his alter-ego.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said:

So, SOG runs away from this thread having been proven an ass yet again. He had the audacity to tell me he does condemn such things, but I know for a fact he never does, he just spouts of some nonsense whataboutery to protect Muslim extremists from looking bad by saying things like, oh and whitey's never do this blah blah blah. And to think some people still stand up for him. And I am not referring to his second login in mental mickey.

Good morning sweetheart

Posted
2 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

So, SOG runs away from this thread having been proven an ass yet again. He had the audacity to tell me he does condemn such things, but I know for a fact he never does, he just spouts of some nonsense whataboutery to protect Muslim extremists from looking bad by saying things like, oh and whitey's never do this blah blah blah. And to think some people still stand up for him. And I am not referring to his second login in mental mickey.

Good morning Baby Reindeer. I see you are still spouting your conspiracy theory nonsense but nice to confirm that you are a fully fledged stalker. I have said many times before that I am against any extremist acts or any anti social acts performed by anybody. Surely even you can understand that? Perhaps not. I have never said that “whitey’s don’t do this blah blah blah”. Once again you just make things up to suit your conspiracy theory narratives. If you actually bothered to engage your brain you would see that I say, constantly, that white people here are committing atrocities too but certain people only focus on the activities of the actions of extreme Muslims. Women are more likely to be sexually assaulted by white men than Asian gangs. That is a fact but ignored by those with a specific agenda. If you had a modicum of intelligence you would understand that is not excusing the behaviour of some Asians/Muslims, it is putting it into context. You are more likely to be killed by a kid with a knife than you are a Muslim extremist here yet some people feel the need to be more outraged by the latter. You call me a racist but at the same time you criticise  me for allegedly supporting Asians/Muslims over “whitey’s” . Don’t you see how dumb that makes you look?

You have also decided in your own strange little world that I have two log ins. You, nic, are either batshit crazy or you are on a massive wind up yourself. My money is currently on the former.

I will spell it out for you one final time. Like most normal people, I am on the side of normal, regular law abiding people no matter what colour their skin, what God they worship, where they come from, what football team they support, what language they speak…get the picture?

I don’t care for racists, xenophobes, political extremists of any persuasion, religious zealots, misogynists, white supremacists, anti woke warriors, incels, dickheads who constantly spout conspiracy theories on social media, stalkers who have nothing better to do with their sad little lives than to follow complete strangers around and make up shit about them…get the picture?

Now go away you irritating little tick. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

TDMickey might be an alternative login, but I reckon you are his alter-ego.

I suspect that nic is an alt login for a regular, but defo not for TDMickey. 

  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Good morning Baby Reindeer. I see you are still spouting your conspiracy theory nonsense but nice to confirm that you are a fully fledged stalker. I have said many times before that I am against any extremist acts or any anti social acts performed by anybody. Surely even you can understand that? Perhaps not. I have never said that “whitey’s don’t do this blah blah blah”. Once again you just make things up to suit your conspiracy theory narratives. If you actually bothered to engage your brain you would see that I say, constantly, that white people here are committing atrocities too but certain people only focus on the activities of the actions of extreme Muslims. Women are more likely to be sexually assaulted by white men than Asian gangs. That is a fact but ignored by those with a specific agenda. If you had a modicum of intelligence you would understand that is not excusing the behaviour of some Asians/Muslims, it is putting it into context. You are more likely to be killed by a kid with a knife than you are a Muslim extremist here yet some people feel the need to be more outraged by the latter. You call me a racist but at the same time you criticise  me for allegedly supporting Asians/Muslims over “whitey’s” . Don’t you see how dumb that makes you look?

You have also decided in your own strange little world that I have two log ins. You, nic, are either batshit crazy or you are on a massive wind up yourself. My money is currently on the former.

I will spell it out for you one final time. Like most normal people, I am on the side of normal, regular law abiding people no matter what colour their skin, what God they worship, where they come from, what football team they support, what language they speak…get the picture?

I don’t care for racists, xenophobes, political extremists of any persuasion, religious zealots, misogynists, white supremacists, anti woke warriors, incels, dickheads who constantly spout conspiracy theories on social media, stalkers who have nothing better to do with their sad little lives than to follow complete strangers around and make up shit about them…get the picture?

Now go away you irritating little tick. 

Please do show me where I have shown any conspiracy theory here? I have simply outed you along with many others that you disappear when proven wrong and then come back and stamp your feet with a vain attempt to deflect onto another angle and AVOID THE FACT YOU WERE WRONG AGAIN. You really are a total dope. It is clear to me now beyond any doubt you will never accept being wrong, never apologise when found out, never show any humility. You will just continue to insist you are right on all counts and if anyone has an alternative view you will continue to label them racist, Nazi, right wing etc. You are a pious, racist, narcissistic old fool.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
29 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Please do show me where I have shown any conspiracy theory here? I have simply outed you along with many others that you disappear when proven wrong and then come back and stamp your feet with a vain attempt to deflect onto another angle and AVOID THE FACT YOU WERE WRONG AGAIN. You really are a total dope. It is clear to me now beyond any doubt you will never accept being wrong, never apologise when found out, never show any humility. You will just continue to insist you are right on all counts and if anyone has an alternative view you will continue to label them racist, Nazi, right wing etc. You are a pious, racist, narcissistic old fool.

Image result for nail on head

  • Like 2
Posted
17 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

We could start with two of the best, Covid vaccines and the “Deep State” in the US conspiring to keep Trump out of office.

Once again you show a very limited intelligence and reading ability. Where did i mention anything about consiparcy theory's. Now go away, read the post you replied to again and show me where I mentioned conspiracy theories. Let's try and make it easy for you. In your reply you stated: I see you are still spouting your conspiracy theory nonsense. So, perhaps now you can go back up a few posts and show me where on my post that you REPLIED to, that i spoke of conspiracy theories? To make it even more easy and childlike for you, here is the post i made that you replied to.

So, SOG runs away from this thread having been proven an ass yet again. He had the audacity to tell me he does condemn such things, but I know for a fact he never does, he just spouts of some nonsense whataboutery to protect Muslim extremists from looking bad by saying things like, oh and whitey's never do this blah blah blah. And to think some people still stand up for him. And I am not referring to his second login in mental mickey.

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Once again you show a very limited intelligence and reading ability. Where did i mention anything about consiparcy theory's. Now go away, read the post you replied to again and show me where I mentioned conspiracy theories. Let's try and make it easy for you. In your reply you stated: I see you are still spouting your conspiracy theory nonsense. So, perhaps now you can go back up a few posts and show me where on my post that you REPLIED to, that i spoke of conspiracy theories? To make it even more easy and childlike for you, here is the post i made that you replied to.

So, SOG runs away from this thread having been proven an ass yet again. He had the audacity to tell me he does condemn such things, but I know for a fact he never does, he just spouts of some nonsense whataboutery to protect Muslim extremists from looking bad by saying things like, oh and whitey's never do this blah blah blah. And to think some people still stand up for him. And I am not referring to his second login in mental mickey.

Oh dear. Ok, here we ago again. You have previously mentioned various things that are considered, by normal, rational people, to be conspiracy theories (about Covid vaccines and the “Deep State” in the US for example). You are therefore, by definition, a conspiracy theorist, are you not?

As for running away from this thread, as usual you are wrong. I don’t spend all of my time reading and responding to every post on every thread, despite what you might think. If  the motive for an attack is found by the authorities to terrorism, then you will be hard pressed to find a post from me protesting the innocence of a Muslim extremist (if that is who committed it). We have already see the cost last Summer of what happens when attacks are wrongly attributed therefore it is not unreasonable, is it not, to wait and find out the actual motive of an attack (officially, according the proper, legal procedures) before getting upset about why the person/people committed it.

The thing with you, dear nic, is that, with your conspiracy mind set, you constantly see things that are not there or bend the evidence in front of your myopic eyes to suit your own, odd, agendas.

I’m sure you will correct me if I am wrong, but the last attack that you are referring to has not gone to court yet and the perpetrator's motives have not been examined and determined by due process. If it has and he has been found guilty of carrying out the attack in the name of Islam, then I shall be more than happy, as any normal, rational, person would be, to accept that the attack was a result of religious extremism.

I know you struggle with logic, but maybe this time the penny will drop. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Oh dear. Ok, here we ago again. You have previously mentioned various things that are considered, by normal, rational people, to be conspiracy theories (about Covid vaccines and the “Deep State” in the US for example). You are therefore, by definition, a conspiracy theorist, are you not?

As for running away from this thread, as usual you are wrong. I don’t spend all of my time reading and responding to every post on every thread, despite what you might think. If  the motive for an attack is found by the authorities to terrorism, then you will be hard pressed to find a post from me protesting the innocence of a Muslim extremist (if that is who committed it). We have already see the cost last Summer of what happens when attacks are wrongly attributed therefore it is not unreasonable, is it not, to wait and find out the actual motive of an attack (officially, according the proper, legal procedures) before getting upset about why the person/people committed it.

The thing with you, dear nic, is that, with your conspiracy mind set, you constantly see things that are not there or bend the evidence in front of your myopic eyes to suit your own, odd, agendas.

I’m sure you will correct me if I am wrong, but the last attack that you are referring to has not gone to court yet and the perpetrator's motives have not been examined and determined by due process. If it has and he has been found guilty of carrying out the attack in the name of Islam, then I shall be more than happy, as any normal, rational, person would be, to accept that the attack was a result of religious extremism.

I know you struggle with logic, but maybe this time the penny will drop. 

Good god you are one thick racist. Can you read? Honestly?

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Good god you are one thick racist. Can you read? Honestly?

Every time I read a conspiracy theory and am tempted to fall for it, I think of your posts and am instantly snapped back into reality. Thanks for providing a valuable public service.

I can provide evidence that you are a conspiracy theorist. Where is your evidence that i am a “thick racist”.

Edited by sadoldgit
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Every time I read a conspiracy theory and am tempted to fall for it, I think of your posts and am instantly snapped back into reality. Thanks for providing a valuable public service.

I can provide evidence that you are a conspiracy theorist. Where is your evidence that i am a “thick racist”.

There is plenty of evidence on here of your racist views

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

There is plenty of evidence on here of your racist views

Fine, you will have no problem providing it then will you. And that statement is a bit rich coming from your years of posting against Johnny Foreigner as Delldays, then Batman and now AlexLaw76.

You have spent hours scouring the internet for news of Asian rapists whilst completely ignoring white indigenous rapists and you call someone else a racist.

No surprise to see you aligned with nutty nic.

Ok Dumb and Dumber, I will give you a hand. I assume both of you are not too thick to understand that anyone supporting footballers taking the knee against racism and supporting Black Lives Matter are, on the balance of probabilities, not racist. Go to the thread about taking the knee and Black Lives Matter and come back and tell us which side of the division I was on.

Edited by sadoldgit
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
52 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

There is plenty of evidence on here of your racist views

Is it any wonder after 14 years of Tory rule by far right racists? It’s rubbing off on everyone even non racists. Now we’ve got to endure that narcissists Trumps racist rants with that in the main stream media all the times it’s no wonder even the most decent people are struggling. We can have no personal responsibility for anything with all that going on. I blame the Tories and Trump. Even Mohammed my Muslims friend who I chat on another social media platform agrees, he says the demonism of Islam is down to Trump and the Tories  and he should know he is one

Posted
52 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Fine, you will have no problem providing it then will you. And that statement is a bit rich coming from your years of posting against Johnny Foreigner as Delldays, then Batman and now AlexLaw76.

You have spent hours scouring the internet for news of Asian rapists whilst completely ignoring white indigenous rapists and you call someone else a racist.

No surprise to see you aligned with nutty nic.

Ok Dumb and Dumber, I will give you a hand. I assume both of you are not too thick to understand that anyone supporting footballers taking the knee against racism and supporting Black Lives Matter are, on the balance of probabilities, not racist. Go to the thread about taking the knee and Black Lives Matter and come back and tell us which side of the division I was on.

You were on the side of the typical white, superiority complex individuals who spout off from behind their computer about how terrible it all is and what everyone else needs to do to fix it.

the type that spout they are not racist but make it all about race as they need to help these poor black people because they need the help of white people like themselves

The worst type of racist, do nothing but complain about how terrible it is, tell others what they should do, behave with incredible pious virtuousness in a patronising, let’s help educate these savages attitude because they can’t help themselves because they’re doing it for themselves to fuel their own sense of self importance rather than because they really care. Even now you spout you were on the “right side” not because you care but because you want to be seen to be on the right side and everyone has to know 

that’s the side you were on

  • Like 2
Posted

Yay, I have got the three lines up!

nutty nic - Nationalistic Alexei - Narcissistic Turkish (shouldn’t you be delivering for your boss?)

What are the odds to get the Unholy Trinity all together like this 😂

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Turkish said:

You were on the side of the typical white, superiority complex individuals who spout off from behind their computer about how terrible it all is and what everyone else needs to do to fix it.

the type that spout they are not racist but make it all about race as they need to help these poor black people because they need the help of white people like themselves

The worst type of racist, do nothing but complain about how terrible it is, tell others what they should do, behave with incredible pious virtuousness in a patronising, let’s help educate these savages attitude because they can’t help themselves because they’re doing it for themselves to fuel their own sense of self importance rather than because they really care. Even now you spout you were on the “right side” not because you care but because you want to be seen to be on the right side and everyone has to know 

that’s the side you were on

Do you know that you start a sentence with a capital letter?

I don’t think I have ever seen anyone so angry for so long about people who support other people demonstrating against racism. Have you ever asked yourself why that is? Could it be perhaps that is is because you have racist tendencies yourself maybe? I have never seen anyone get their knickers in a twist as you did over the BLM/knee taking demonstrations as you did. Why would anyone have an issue with others protesting against racism, I used to wonder. It still touches a nerve now for you doesn’t it? Just like anything you perceive to be “woke”. 

I have seen two good definitions of “woke”. One is not being an asshole and the other was a quote from Jane Fonda the other day when she said being woke is just giving a damn about other people.

As the self imposed king of Anti-Woke on here, as yourself this. What have I got against not being an asshole and why do I have a problem when people give a damn about other people?

You may need some help from someone with a bit of empathy in their character.

😘
 

Edited by sadoldgit
  • Haha 4
Posted
45 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Do you know that you start a sentence with a capital letter?

I don’t think I have ever seen anyone so angry for so long about people who support other people demonstrating against racism. Have you ever asked yourself why that is? Could it be perhaps that is is because you have racist tendencies yourself maybe? I have never seen anyone get their knickers in a twist as you did over the BLM/knee taking demonstrations as you did. Why would anyone have an issue with others protesting against racism, I used to wonder. It still touches a nerve now for you doesn’t it? Just like anything you perceive to be “woke”. 

I have seen two good definitions of “woke”. One is not being an asshole and the other was a quote from Jane Fonda the other day when she said being woke is just giving a damn about other people.

As the self imposed king of Anti-Woke on here, as yourself this. What have I got against not being an asshole and why do I have a problem when people give a damn about other people?

You may need some help from someone with a bit of empathy in their character.

😘
 

You are very odd 😂😂😂

Posted
54 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

I have seen two good definitions of “woke”. One is not being an asshole and the other was a quote from Jane Fonda the other day when she said being woke is just giving a damn about other people

Very convenient to not mentioning hounding lecturers off campus and ensuring some don’t work again as seen as transphobic when have just questioned the bs of insisting on using pronouns. So not just about ‘giving a damn about other people’

you should read ‘The Coddling of the American Mind’ if you think it is just about showing kindness and respect

  • Like 2
Posted

I think it has been made absolutely crystal clear that who ever this sog/mickey guy is, he is indeed a messed up and very pious nasty individual. I see little point in conversing with him further to be honest. Best that these sorts are ignored and not given the attention they crave. I personally have caught him out on things countless times and have seen many others do the same. And we have all seen how vile he reacts to being caught out. For me now there is no point to replying to him as you will never win with someone like him. He is incapable of any humility or decency. He is right, his views are correct, everyone opposing him is racist, crazy, and stupid. His attitude in that way and view will never change.

  • Haha 3
Posted
15 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

Soggy - the king of empathy. 

The guy that described black people as coconuts, constantly refers to all Israelis as Jews, described someone convicted of child porn as “‘Hardly the crime of century” defended a convicted domestic abuser, someone who constantly gets caught out lying, constantly unleashes abusive comments on anyone who dare disagree with him accusing them of all sorts of things. Yep we all know what side he’s on

  • Like 2
Posted

The Chief Constable of Merseyside Police has said that the CPS instructed her to not reveal the religion of the Southport attacker and thereby revealing he is not Muslim.

Posted
On 26/02/2025 at 07:09, Turkish said:

The guy that described black people as coconuts, constantly refers to all Israelis as Jews, described someone convicted of child porn as “‘Hardly the crime of century” defended a convicted domestic abuser, someone who constantly gets caught out lying, constantly unleashes abusive comments on anyone who dare disagree with him accusing them of all sorts of things. Yep we all know what side he’s on

He also called Priti Patel an immigrant. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

A 40 year old German man has been arrested. Let’s just hope that he is a German Muslim and not a right wing nutter eh hypo?

I suspect you are desperately hoping it is a right winger nutter SOG. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

A 40 year old German man has been arrested. Let’s just hope that he is a German Muslim and not a right wing nutter eh hypo?

It wouldn't change the ludicrously high amount of Islamist terror attacks in Germany this year. Anything to say about that? Care to offer a reason? 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

"German media is reporting that the man, who was arrested and is being treated for his injuries in hospital under tight police protection does not have a migration background and is said to have a known history of mental illness."

It has also been reported he was armed.

Edited by badgerx16
Posted
20 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

A 40 year old German man has been arrested. Let’s just hope that he is a German Muslim and not a right wing nutter eh hypo?

Maybe it was a Jew. You’d love that wouldn’t you? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...