Jump to content

BA Plane in Las Vegas


Hatch
 Share

Recommended Posts

just minutes later this plane would have been in flight.

 

 

...and crashing on me. I work on the west side of the airport, directly adjacent to it and under the approach.

 

I wonder how long it'll be parked here before the scrappers come along to dismantle it.

Edited by LVSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a few pics yesterday, pretty sure there will be some of people inside and sliding down the emergency escape. I did notice that some people were carrying bags etc then this

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34191035

 

I guess its no wonder 13 people were injured.

Ohhh the planes on fire, what do you mean you want to get off the plane before it blows up, you can wait till my wife and I have got to get my luggage out of the locker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and crashing on me. I work on the west side of the airport, directly adjacent to it and under the approach.

 

I wonder how long it'll be parked here before the scrappers come along to dismantle it.

 

A bit dramatic. They would have cut the fuel and fired an extinguisher into the engine which would almost certainly have put it out. The airflow would have dissipated the heat pretty quickly once the fire was out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More to the point, everyone got out and there were twice as many exits as there usually are to disembark all located away from the fire.

 

If self-preservation was a factor you'd better believe no-one would have been getting their luggage, so what it implies is an organised, controlled exit during which there was plenty of time to decide whether to leave stuff behind or spend 5 seconds opening an overhead compartment and grabbing stuff from it. Had there been a time-restricted threat none of that stuff would have happened.

 

I am amused by some of the comments too, people being appalled at "being barged" when trying to get off other planes in evacuations. What exactly are they expecting? Clarkson's apocryphal story about monkeys and hot floors springs to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit dramatic. They would have cut the fuel and fired an extinguisher into the engine which would almost certainly have put it out. The airflow would have dissipated the heat pretty quickly once the fire was out.

 

Shrapnel from exploding engine damaging the wing or fuel tank once airborne would have been quite dramatic. And reports are suggesting that the engine fire extinguisher failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shrapnel from exploding engine damaging the wing or fuel tank once airborne would have been quite dramatic. And reports are suggesting that the engine fire extinguisher failed.

The engine casing is designed to contain the "shrapnel" from an exploding engine. I don't know whether it did, but it should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More to the point, everyone got out and there were twice as many exits as there usually are to disembark all located away from the fire.

 

If self-preservation was a factor you'd better believe no-one would have been getting their luggage, so what it implies is an organised, controlled exit during which there was plenty of time to decide whether to leave stuff behind or spend 5 seconds opening an overhead compartment and grabbing stuff from it. Had there been a time-restricted threat none of that stuff would have happened.

 

I am amused by some of the comments too, people being appalled at "being barged" when trying to get off other planes in evacuations. What exactly are they expecting? Clarkson's apocryphal story about monkeys and hot floors springs to mind.

 

I'm sorry but that is nonsense, the people getting their luggage are selfish and/or stupid. Unless you are an expert in aeroplane construction you would not know how quickly that type of fire could spread, or how close the whole plane is to exploding.

 

It's not just a time issue either, luggage can create unnecessary hazards in those situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but that is nonsense, the people getting their luggage are selfish and/or stupid. Unless you are an expert in aeroplane construction you would not know how quickly that type of fire could spread, or how close the whole plane is to exploding.

 

It's not just a time issue either, luggage can create unnecessary hazards in those situations.

 

Lots of people all nicely spaced apart on the runway, shows plenty of time. No cramming or panic. Agreed they CAN create hazards, but clearly this was a relaxed "emergency", some of them were probably ready to get off it before the fire even caught. In fact the abc video here shows the staff telling people to remain seated when the fire starts, it was totally controlled and there was clearly time to grab a bag: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34206347

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of people all nicely spaced apart on the runway, shows plenty of time. No cramming or panic. Agreed they CAN create hazards, but clearly this was a relaxed "emergency", some of them were probably ready to get off it before the fire even caught. In fact the abc video here shows the staff telling people to remain seated when the fire starts, it was totally controlled and there was clearly time to grab a bag: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34206347

 

Yeah, in hindsight there was obviously enough time but these situations can change very quickly. Personally I would prefer it if people did what they are told by the hostesses instead of getting their suitcase out of the locker if my life was on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...