Bridgey's Move To City...

[Um Bongo]

Has been down for an undisclosed Fee (Believed to be around £11m)

 

Now, Lowe was here when he was sold. Surely he has got a Sell On Fee in there somewhere, or was it a bad move by Lowe?

[St Chalet]

Done to death many times.

 

Le Saux was part of the deal and no sell on as his original contract was fulfilled.

 

Next...

[SaintJackoInHurworth]

PANTS!!! What a disaster by Lowe there! To think a 10% sell-on fee would have netted up to £1.2m based on transfer fee of up to £12 quoted on BBC website:

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_city/7807951.stm

[Saint_clark]

FFS, Lowe out etc....

Rubbish. You will never see a deal involving cash, a part exchange AND a sell on fee. It would have to be a player of George Bests quality for us to command that kind of deal.

[Stu Man Do]

PANTS!!! What a disaster by Lowe there! To think a 10% sell-on fee would have netted up to £1.2m based on transfer fee of up to £12 quoted on BBC website:

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_city/7807951.stm

 

Surely it would have been a percentage of any further profit chelsea made on bridgey? So lets say 10% on 5 million, even so yes a useful amount of money but seeing as we got million up front for him + Le saux's wages subsidised I imagine we've sort of had our moneys worth out of them.

 

Does anyone know if Chelsea funded any of Cork's wages?

[SaintJackoInHurworth]

FFS, Lowe out etc....

Rubbish. You will never see a deal involving cash, a part exchange AND a sell on fee. It would have to be a player of George Bests quality for us to command that kind of deal.

 

yeah - but maybe with hindsight it would have been better to have got a slightly higher fee with a sell-on fee and then bought a younger player elsewhere instead of Le Saux?