SO16_Saint Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Would appear not. 2PM is the new default announcement time for SFC it appears
Nolan Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 2PM is the new default announcement time for SFC it appears Probably as it's 9am US eastern time.
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 That was a good away kit, even if the 'proper' version was only available through the grey market. Do ask him, hadn't realised he fled the nation shortly after his kit involvement! Not the anniversary one, the one after it. Kenwyne modelled the white grey one.
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 Looks legit to me ... seems like a fairly standard UA design feature Like I said, last year's designs, same as Spurs light blue away last season. Toluca have already replaced it. Won't be that.
doggface Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Pretty sure those kits are legit. Look at the long socks on the training ground, they are identical. The sports bra design is horrific. V disappointing, hopefully look better in real images. The training kit colours are Minging across the board and the badge looks cheap. Oh well at least I will be richer....
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 Pretty sure those kits are legit. Look at the long socks on the training ground, they are identical. The sports bra design is horrific. V disappointing, hopefully look better in real images. The training kit colours are Minging across the board and the badge looks cheap. Oh well at least I will be richer.... That's a tendency with training kit though, to use old first team styles. Macron do it as well. I'd heard there was a white band, but that it was where the sponsor was. Well, we'll see. I don't particularly like the design but I'm more bothered that it's a year old...
SO16_Saint Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 That's a tendency with training kit though, to use old first team styles. Macron do it as well. I'd heard there was a white band, but that it was where the sponsor was. Well, we'll see. I don't particularly like the design but I'm more bothered that it's a year old... But it's new to us...
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 (edited) The leak last year was from the Adidas catalogue which was the source for all the Adidas kits in the PL Handbook. The Handbook can't be a source for leaks as it isn't released until August, and teams don't have to announce their kits until 2 weeks before it comes out. Going to try to upload the screenshot from the Spurs page in the PL handbook last year to show you what a legit UA design drawing looks like: The upward pointing laces on the shorts do suggest similarities... Edited 1 July, 2016 by The9
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 It could still just be a fake using last year's template though...
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 Pretty sure those kits are legit. Look at the long socks on the training ground, they are identical. The sports bra design is horrific. V disappointing, hopefully look better in real images. The training kit colours are Minging across the board and the badge looks cheap. Oh well at least I will be richer.... Also, they wouldn't use away kit socks as training socks, makes no sense at all... I think it's a fake.
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 Here's a close® up of the Spurs Away as in the PL handbook last year. [ATTACH=CONFIG]2079[/ATTACH]
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 The "cut off" laces of the black/grey away shorts also smack of dodgy Photoshop to me.
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 But it's new to us... Yeah but it doesn't say much about your great new kit brand if they give you used designs out of the blocks, does it?
Wade Garrett Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 It would appear that Stevie Wonder does kit design for UA. Horrendous kit, on a par with the Pony one.
Saint86 Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Please God no. It's f-ing awful. I agree, would be one of the worst saints kits in my lifetime. Fortunately that isn't our kit.
a1ex2001 Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 The "cut off" laces of the black/grey away shorts also smack of dodgy Photoshop to me. You can see the dodgy photoshop work a mile off, between the legs on the grey shorts is pure white the rest of the back ground is a dodgy grey. Not saying they are not the kits but that certainly isn't an official product shot.
John Boy Saint Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 When do we get officially put out of misery? as I have lost track...... Or senility has struck!! Ta very Muchley
diggers Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 http://mobile.saintsfc.co.uk/news/article/2016-17/20160701-first-day-training-claude-puel-southampton-3163387.aspx Advert for the training kit at bottom of article
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 You can see the dodgy photoshop work a mile off, between the legs on the grey shorts is pure white the rest of the back ground is a dodgy grey. Not saying they are not the kits but that certainly isn't an official product shot. There are a couple of areas of grey bleeding out of the template as well, and where the grey meets the black on the away shirt.
Saint_Ash Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 The holes in the neck of the shirt has been coloured in white, badly, for some reason as well.
SO16_Saint Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Few days to wait and hope like hell that template is very wrong. Yes... the more i look at it, the more dodgy it looks... i didnt really look that closely, but it does seem to be a bit of a bodge job / photoshop effort
Saint-Armstrong Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Not sure that the template above is the actual kit. Oh well, three and a bit more days of ninnying and we'll know.
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 5th it is then before we see the Bra strip. You're a bra strip.
lloydie Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Pretty sure that'll be it, we had a very similar quality leak of last years kit. & I know I'll be berated for saying so, but I reckon that's alright actually. *puts on hard hat and awaits abuse*
lloydie Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Oh and also, can we not just release the effing kit for once instead of countless teasers? I don't appreciate this "new kit foreplay" we go through each season with little teasers, campaigns etc... does every other club do it?
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 Anyone know where that wooden walkway actually is? I'm guessing they filmed everything Southampton based yesterday in and around the boat stuff to go along with whatever footage they had in Baltimore, but where is that bit in Southampton? Ocean Village? Shamrock Quay?
SO16_Saint Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 (edited) Anyone know where that wooden walkway actually is? I'm guessing they filmed everything Southampton based yesterday in and around the boat stuff to go along with whatever footage they had in Baltimore, but where is that bit in Southampton? Ocean Village? Shamrock Quay? I would guess it's in Baltimore itself near the UA HQ? Edit: I'd say it was IMO: http://sneakernews.com/2015/09/17/under-armour-has-plans-for-a-massive-new-campus-in-south-baltimore/ https://www.bisnow.com/baltimore/news/office/under-armours-port-covington-campus-to-include-three-towers-55549 Edited 1 July, 2016 by SO16_Saint
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 Pretty sure that'll be it, we had a very similar quality leak of last years kit. & I know I'll be berated for saying so, but I reckon that's alright actually. *puts on hard hat and awaits abuse* Last year's leak was clearly and obviously legit from the first second because it matched existing documents which were recognised. This one looks like someone's tried hard to make it look legit doing the same kind of thing, but has a few giveaways that it isn't.
DT Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Please God no. It's f-ing awful. Absolutely disgusting. If this is a titbit to guage the reaction of the fans, please change. Abysmal. Really have let their worst designers loose. For about an hour.
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 I would guess it's in Baltimore itself near the UA HQ? Did they REALLY take a Saints kit crate out there just for that?
Batman Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Absolutely disgusting. If this is a titbit to guage the reaction of the fans, please change. Abysmal. Really have let their worst designers loose. For about an hour. we got our stripes back. ffs
DT Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 5th it is then before we see the Bra strip. As close as we were ever going to get to iBRAhimovic. hahahahahahahahahaha *takes hilarious man of the year prize*
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 (edited) Absolutely disgusting. If this is a titbit to guage the reaction of the fans, please change. Abysmal. Really have let their worst designers loose. For about an hour. I love the idea that the club would leak a teaser of a poorly coloured in Photoshop as a legit leak, when they're about to release an already announced set of videos of someone returning the kit from Baltimore that they told us about at least a month ago. And also that there's any possibility whatsoever of changing the kit IN JULY when they have tens of thousands of pieces of it already in Southampton. Edited 1 July, 2016 by The9
once_bitterne Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Released on the 5th July #barraised or #braraised?
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 Did they REALLY take a Saints kit crate out there just for that? To answer my own question, yes they did, there's a pickup truck with a US style white numberplate visible out of the window of the Under Armour building at the start of the clip.
benjii Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 I agree, would be one of the worst saints kits in my lifetime. Fortunately that isn't our kit. I think you'll find it is!
The9 Posted 1 July, 2016 Author Posted 1 July, 2016 Lol the #meltdown on this thread. Quite. I don't think it's the kit, I know literally one thing about the design, and that doesn't tally with it.
SO16_Saint Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Quite. I don't think it's the kit, I know literally one thing about the design, and that doesn't tally with it. But the 1 thing you DO know would make it a worse looking kit than the bra kit... the white box for the logo. #BraGate
DT Posted 1 July, 2016 Posted 1 July, 2016 Quite. I don't think it's the kit, I know literally one thing about the design, and that doesn't tally with it. is it that it is 'not designed by an 11 year old'?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now