Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I imagine he wanted to manage the finances in the Champions League.

 

I think there's a special theme you can get for Excel 2013 if you are a CL club. That was what did it.

Posted

Ooops that sounds as if somebody has dropped a bollock, if the Toby thing fizzles out and he goes to Spurs without much trouble then we know where it went wrong

Posted

Just to follow up on my post from earlier, I knew that the CFO "had left" on June 24th. If he has indeed “dropped a b0ll0ck” regarding the Toby deal/contract, then Southampton have known about it for a while, it hasn’t come to light over the last few days.

 

Spurs are such parasites.

Posted
Just to follow up on my post from earlier, I knew that the CFO "had left" on June 24th. If he has indeed “dropped a b0ll0ck” regarding the Toby deal/contract, then Southampton have known about it for a while, it hasn’t come to light over the last few days.

 

Spurs are such parasites.

 

........will be interesting to see who his next employer will be ?..........:rolleyes:.

Posted

I would say he didn't read Toby's contract properly and the timing/buy out clause thing only came to light when Les said "Here, Let me have a look at that"

Posted
I would say he didn't read Toby's contract properly and the timing/buy out clause thing only came to light when Les said "Here, Let me have a look at that"

 

Could be anything though, even if it's directly related to that situation (and there's no guarantee it was, though the timing is interesting), it could be that the text was poorly worded and unfavourable for Saints, that there was ambiguity, that the contract didn't represent the agreement management had decided on, or any number of other things.

Posted
I would say he didn't read Toby's contract properly and the timing/buy out clause thing only came to light when Les said "Here, Let me have a look at that"

 

How on earth do you reach that conclusion from the available evidence?

Posted
How on earth do you reach that conclusion from the available evidence?

We are Internet Warriors int we, we makes it up as we go along [emoji2]

Posted
Bigger staff turnover than when cortese was here.

 

he had at least four marketing directors and three ticket office managers

Posted

Well we don't really postulate hard facts here do we? There is little evidence available so I say what I think the reason might be. Big change in our position on toby and then he leaves. Coincidence? I think not

Posted
Well we don't really postulate hard facts here do we? There is little evidence available so I say what I think the reason might be. Big change in our position on toby and then he leaves. Coincidence? I think not

 

It's a Monday and he leaves. Coincidence? Shuhoorly not...

 

Smiley face thingy

Posted

Pure speculation on my behalf , but could Davud Bence actually be either Guan or King Billy hence the reason we haven't heard from them for several days . As I said pure speculation on my behalf

Posted
Pure speculation on my behalf , but could Davud Bence actually be either Guan or King Billy hence the reason we haven't heard from them for several days . As I said pure speculation on my behalf

 

Suffering succotash is that true??

Posted
Pure speculation on my behalf , but could Davud Bence actually be either Guan or King Billy hence the reason we haven't heard from them for several days . As I said pure speculation on my behalf

 

If so, I would have expected more ITK info about lions and wifelets between October 2012 and April 2014.

Posted
I'd wager he just wasn't very good at his job, no specific reason, no need for conspiracy theories.

 

If one of the things he "wasn't very good at" was insuring that any 'option to buy' clause in loanee contracts was watertight, then the Toby situation could be the straw that broke the camel's back and thus directly related to his departure.

 

All conjecture, of course, but an entirely plausible (conspiracy) theory nonetheless.

Posted

Would be strange for a Chief Financial Officer, an accountant by training, was left responsible for Legal wording in a contract.

Posted
Would be strange for a Chief Financial Officer, an accountant by training, was left responsible for Legal wording in a contract.

 

Yep, quite. If Saints don't have their own legal councel I'd assume they'd pay a law firm to approve the contracts etc.. Unless it is just an area under his directorship and the buck has stopped with the main man and it is actually some 3rd party law forms fault.

 

Of course, I'm just speculating, more likely it is just a coincidence and he could be leaving for a number of reasons...

Posted
Heard down the pub he was sacked due to messing up the Toby contract. The guy who told me that works in administration there.

 

Amazing what people down pubs are willing to say, perhaps it's a case of in vino veritas.

Posted
Yep, quite. If Saints don't have their own legal councel I'd assume they'd pay a law firm to approve the contracts etc.. Unless it is just an area under his directorship and the buck has stopped with the main man and it is actually some 3rd party law forms fault.

 

Of course, I'm just speculating, more likely it is just a coincidence and he could be leaving for a number of reasons...

 

he may have been responsible for specifying the contract and liaising with the solicitors. in my experience solicitors these days rarely understand the commercial ramifications of anything other than an off the shelf product, so they have to be spoon fed everything and you need to double and triple check that what they have drafted produces the expected outcome.

 

that said, I would have expected our in house solicitor (http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/person/21990/karenjit-kaur-dhaliwal) to be involved and culpable rather than the CFO

Posted
Heard down the pub he was sacked due to messing up the Toby contract. The guy who told me that works in administration there.

Or maybe losing the Sunseeker Sponsorship perhaps?

Posted
commercial revenue and lack of it is over his year in the job i suspect is why he's been shown the door.

 

Generation of revenue is the domain of the CCO not the CFO.

Posted
I heard down the pub that he was caught rubbing his cock on he mouthpiece of Ralph Kruegers phone, the bloke that told me is a cleaner at St Mary's.

 

Who was Ralph making the call to?

Posted
commercial revenue and lack of it is over his year in the job i suspect is why he's been shown the door.

 

Maybe he was let go because he wasn't happy with the ticketing strategy?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...