Bad Wolf Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 According to TalkSport anyway... http://talksport.com/football/revealed-top-10-premier-league-clubs-most-debt-150618149584 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 (edited) What do you mean "still"? We've known the debt situation since the accounts were published in March... http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/article/20150330-southampton-financial-results-2013-14-2367070.aspx It is soft debt to the owner and the company made a £33.4m profit. UPDATE: The opening post originally said "still" before a very quick edit left no trace of it Pains me to say it, but MLG is right it did say Still originally. Edited 25 June, 2015 by Matthew Le God Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolan Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Just enough to counter income and reduce the tax burden. It's the sensible thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Wolf Posted 25 June, 2015 Author Share Posted 25 June, 2015 What do you mean "still"? We've known the debt situation since the accounts were published in March... http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/article/20150330-southampton-financial-results-2013-14-2367070.aspx It is soft debt to the owner and the company made a £33.4m profit. I didn't say still =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appy Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 I didn't say still =/ Blimey, now he's making up things to correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesaint Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Seems to me that this was written buy a 'journalist' who has very little knowledge of the workings of football or business finance in general, read the word 'debt' somewhere in the accounts and pulled out a number without any context surrounding it. #factless (?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brave Sir Robin Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesaint Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Seems to me that this was written by a 'journalist' who has very little knowledge of the workings of football or business finance in general, read the word 'debt' somewhere in the accounts and pulled out a number without any context surrounding it. #factless (?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrant Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Just enough to counter income and reduce the tax burden. It's the sensible thing to do. What he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 I didn't say still =/ Blimey, now he's making up things to correct. He did, its a very quick edit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Balls Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 He did, its a very quick edit. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 He did, its a very quick edit. I don't believe you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 He did, its a very quick edit. Pains me to say it, but MLG is right it did say Still originally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 According to TalkSport anyway... http://talksport.com/football/revealed-top-10-premier-league-clubs-most-debt-150618149584 Actually not according to Talksport, source is the Daily Fail, 29 March 2015: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3016432/Club-club-guide-Premier-League-s-financial-health.html Figures would also be based on year ending June 2014 (so despite all the references to Ronald in the Fail report, it would be almost completely unrelated to anything he did) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Pains me to say it, but MLG is right it did say Still originally. So why when I make an edit, it says in the post it has been edited, but when IC does it there is no record of an edit having been made? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 So why when I make an edit, it says in the post it has been edited, but when IC does it there is no record of an edit having been made? If you edit within a few minutes, I find that it doesn't mention the fact that an edit has been made. How long was the timespan here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 (edited) What do you mean "still"? I didn't say still =/ Blimey, now he's making up things to correct. He did, its a very quick edit. Lol I don't believe you [ATTACH=CONFIG]1716[/ATTACH] Here is an indépendant witness... Pains me to say it, but MLG is right it did say Still originally. So why when I make an edit, it says in the post it has been edited, but when IC does it there is no record of an edit having been made? If you edit a post within about 3 minutes of posting, it doesn't leave a note saying an edit has been made. Edited 25 June, 2015 by Matthew Le God Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint IQ Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Jesus. Is it really worth getting so worked up you have to quote an "independent witness" and explain how edited posts work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewell Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Golden thread potential, please keep it coming! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appy Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Here is an indépendant witness... If you edit a post within about 3 minutes of posting, it doesn't leave a note saying an edit has been made. You must be a right laugh on a night out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 And you'd be a terrible juror... I didn't say still =/ Blimey, now he's making up things to correct. Instant Classic lied and you took his word in order to turn it against me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_emu Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Can we have a poll on this please, let's take it to Kangaroo Court Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appy Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Can we have a poll on this please, let's take it to Kangaroo Court Can I be the juror? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goatboy Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 Is this the bully MLG thread? I see turkish' mr men image has been done already. Can we talk about stadium expansion now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sotonist Posted 25 June, 2015 Share Posted 25 June, 2015 So why when I make an edit, it says in the post it has been edited, but when IC does it there is no record of an edit having been made? in my experience of forum software if you edit something before someone has replied or within a certain time frame if nobody has replied it doesn't tend to show an edit. if someone posts a reply it usually always shows edit if you commit the edit after the reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts