Jump to content

Nigel Adkins on Talksport from 8pm


Gorgiesaint

Recommended Posts

Anyone aware if Reading have done better or worse since Adkins left?

 

Not really much difference to be honest, which kind of shows that Adkins wasn't really bad - he was just working in a tough environment. That's what fans don't seem to understand sometimes, Sunderland being a prime example - they go through managers like nobody's business, yet I can pretty much be sure that they're not all crap. What is crap is the club structure above the manager, which doesn't exactly create an environment for anyone to thrive. Exactly the same as Newcastle with Pardew and now Carver, Keegan before them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still love Nigel

 

This. Hes a great guy and did a tremendous amount for us, and i LOVED his post match interviews. Mr. Positive and always had the players playing for him. I still believe we would have stayed up with him in the Prem.

 

@Saint-Armstrong, great write up and an interesting read!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really much difference to be honest, which kind of shows that Adkins wasn't really bad - he was just working in a tough environment. That's what fans don't seem to understand sometimes, Sunderland being a prime example - they go through managers like nobody's business, yet I can pretty much be sure that they're not all crap. What is crap is the club structure above the manager, which doesn't exactly create an environment for anyone to thrive. Exactly the same as Newcastle with Pardew and now Carver, Keegan before them.

 

A little while ago I saw a comparison chart on SSN comparing Nige & Clarke after 20+ games.

 

Nigel came out on top.

 

I work in Reading and there are about a dozen STH in my office. Adkins has come up in conversation quite frequently and ALL of them say Reading are far better under Clarke than they were Adkins. Unanimous agreement that Reading play better football, are defensively better and the players look more fired up since NA left the club. They also highlight how much better Clarke is tactically than Adkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really much difference to be honest, which kind of shows that Adkins wasn't really bad - he was just working in a tough environment. That's what fans don't seem to understand sometimes, Sunderland being a prime example - they go through managers like nobody's business, yet I can pretty much be sure that they're not all crap. What is crap is the club structure above the manager, which doesn't exactly create an environment for anyone to thrive. Exactly the same as Newcastle with Pardew and now Carver, Keegan before them.

 

While I appreciate the essence of what you say I find the strength of your feeling there a little baffling. How the only manager in our history to achieve back-to back promotions cannot be considered a legend is something of a mystery! Nigel Adkins is someone I personally hold in the same esteem as Le God, Rickie and any other hero figure I've known in my Saints supporting lifetime.

 

Adkins did well at Saints, there's no denying that, however he isn't a legend. He inherited a good side from the Pardew regime which the foundations were already laid. Granted he still had to get us promoted but the cynic in me still feels he cost us the championship title due to his naivety.

 

It's also key to remember that as quickly as NA took a side from League 1 to the Premier league, he very nearly took a side from the Premier League to League 1 as quick (all RFC fans I know think they would have been relegated this season under him!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adkins did well at Saints, there's no denying that, however he isn't a legend. He inherited a good side from the Pardew regime which the foundations were already laid. Granted he still had to get us promoted but the cynic in me still feels he cost us the championship title due to his naivety.

 

It's also key to remember that as quickly as NA took a side from League 1 to the Premier league, he very nearly took a side from the Premier League to League 1 as quick (all RFC fans I know think they would have been relegated this season under him!)

 

We will have to agree to disagree. Nigel Adkins is a legend for the reasons I have previously stated, doesn't matter what he inherited, or what he didn't do, he did give me and thousands others a story to hold onto for the rest of our days as we went up twice in two seasons. He made it happen. And as for Reading, really couldn't care less about that rabble... that you have gone a little native has clearly clouded your judgement. ;)

Edited by Colinjb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adkins did well at Saints, there's no denying that, however he isn't a legend. He inherited a good side from the Pardew regime which the foundations were already laid. Granted he still had to get us promoted but the cynic in me still feels he cost us the championship title due to his naivety.

 

It's also key to remember that as quickly as NA took a side from League 1 to the Premier league, he very nearly took a side from the Premier League to League 1 as quick (all RFC fans I know think they would have been relegated this season under him!)

"Granted he still had to get us promoted".

 

Twice.

 

He got us promoted twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adkins did well at Saints, there's no denying that, however he isn't a legend. He inherited a good side from the Pardew regime which the foundations were already laid. Granted he still had to get us promoted but the cynic in me still feels he cost us the championship title due to his naivety.

 

It's also key to remember that as quickly as NA took a side from League 1 to the Premier league, he very nearly took a side from the Premier League to League 1 as quick (all RFC fans I know think they would have been relegated this season under him!)

 

Summed up perfectly.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work in Reading and there are about a dozen STH in my office. Adkins has come up in conversation quite frequently and ALL of them say Reading are far better under Clarke than they were Adkins. Unanimous agreement that Reading play better football, are defensively better and the players look more fired up since NA left the club. They also highlight how much better Clarke is tactically than Adkins.

 

Clarke has had ample time and resources to turn that club around and hasn't. Reading fans are a strange bunch so quite why you'll respect their opinion and talk down a manager that did nothing but good for us is beyond me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really much difference to be honest, which kind of shows that Adkins wasn't really bad - he was just working in a tough environment. That's what fans don't seem to understand sometimes, Sunderland being a prime example - they go through managers like nobody's business, yet I can pretty much be sure that they're not all crap. What is crap is the club structure above the manager, which doesn't exactly create an environment for anyone to thrive. Exactly the same as Newcastle with Pardew and now Carver, Keegan before them.

 

Clarke has had ample time and resources to turn that club around and hasn't. Reading fans are a strange bunch so quite why you'll respect their opinion and talk down a manager that did nothing but good for us is beyond me.

 

I was answering a question on how Reading have done post-Adkins, surely the opinions of Reading STH's who watch their team every week deserve to be respected as they'll know better than anyone how they have fared. It can also be argued that our fanbase is a strange bunch.

 

As for Clarke, he's had one transfer window with zero funds and has inherited a squad with "a losing mentality" which he managed to get to the FA Cup semi-final (which they could so easily have won).

 

As I've previously stated, Adkins did well for us, however I have an opinion on him and it's not that he's as perfect or legendary as others may feel. Not a club legend by any stretch of the imagination, to mention him in the same breathe as MLT is ludicrous. Paul Lambert did what NA did, and did it better, yet he has a pretty bad reputation at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh Nige, if only you'd waited and taken the imminently available Palace or West Brom jobs instead of getting stitched up at Reading, you could have dipped in and out of bottom half Prem jobs for years, your point already made.

 

Instead of that you've got Reading's lies smeared all over your CV and will need to repeat the Saints job at Sheffield United to get yourself back to that level again.

 

Draw a line under it, good luck, and see you in the Prem in 3 years. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...