saintnicoolas Posted 12 May, 2015 Share Posted 12 May, 2015 http://www.thefightingcock.co.uk/2015/05/paul-mitchell-the-transfer-genius/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted 12 May, 2015 Share Posted 12 May, 2015 http://www.thefightingcock.co.uk/2015/05/paul-mitchell-the-transfer-genius/ Interesting read, but inconclusive really, other than that some transfers are successful, some are not. Bloke spent a lot of time to reach that conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintnicoolas Posted 12 May, 2015 Author Share Posted 12 May, 2015 Its a scary amount of money they now value Ramirez and Osvaldo at-not great signings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 12 May, 2015 Share Posted 12 May, 2015 Every transfer has an element of luck to it, you can cover as many eventualities you can...but there's always a chance it's not how you thought it would be. It happens at every club in the world. But if you have a good structure in place, then you have the scope to cover as many eventualities as possible and reduce the risk. For as many poor players we've signed, we've signed good ones as well. Yoshida, Clyne, Jay, Victor, Lovren, Mane, Tadic, Davis, Bertrand, Forster, Cork - Not a bad return from any of those, whether it's on the field performances or eventual profit. I'd include Pelle but I feel he was more of a Koeman signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 12 May, 2015 Share Posted 12 May, 2015 Every transfer has an element of luck to it, you can cover as many eventualities you can...but there's always a chance it's not how you thought it would be. It happens at every club in the world. But if you have a good structure in place, then you have the scope to cover as many eventualities as possible and reduce the risk. For as many poor players we've signed, we've signed good ones as well. Yoshida, Clyne, Jay, Victor, Lovren, Mane, Tadic, Davis, Bertrand, Forster, Cork - Not a bad return from any of those, whether it's on the field performances or eventual profit. I'd include Pelle but I feel he was more of a Koeman signing. Pelle has been a better signing so far than Tadic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 12 May, 2015 Share Posted 12 May, 2015 Pelle has been a better signing so far than Tadic. Tadic has had a bad groin injury for a long time now. Messi wouldn't be as good as he normally is with a groin injury so to judge Tadic over the last few months is harsh. Let's see what he does next season when fully fit again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 12 May, 2015 Share Posted 12 May, 2015 Boruc MV of £880k is complete and utter bull. His MV is £0 as he is a free agent in a couple of months. I would also say that the whole of football has got more expensive and MVs should really all go up. I look at S.Davis and the value of £4.8m which in the scheme of things these days is nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now