Jump to content

Mane position?


Roger
 Share

Recommended Posts

When he first played for us he played as a winger almost. Then vs palace was moved upfront and scored vs palace, Chelsea and arsenal. Against qpr was played as a right winger near enough to accommodate Elia. I know he scored but then against west ham was played deeper too and less effective. Would everyone agree his best position is upfront around pelle where he can do more damage. Can we accommodate that system and tadic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mané is very mobile, and seems to turn up on the left as much as the right side. (won't make too many early comparison but has scored from some unbelieveable angles (ala Marian Pahars)

 

With Pelle being so tightly marked of late, I can see Graziano dragging defenders off (as Lambert used to) ....and opening up space for Mane to run onto a pass / centre. (Similar situation with Elia).

 

Like you, I like the idea of saying so-and-so is a left winger, or striker but playing styles are much more varied nowadays.

When I started watching Saints in the 1950's....we had centre-forwards who were served by tricky wingers, and inside forwards who were fed by wing-halfs, and full backs who rarely crossed the half-way line.

However, so far this season .....we've had 12 different goalscorers, and most of them have come from midfielders, or defenders.

 

Interestingly, neither of our all time goalscorers was an out-and-out striker. Mick Channon (though occasionally wearing a no.9) was an inside forward (old terms) and MLT was called an attacking midfielder.

 

As players no longer having meaningful numbers on their shirts (1-11), I'm glad every time we get the ball over the line, no matter who scores it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When he first played for us he played as a winger almost. Then vs palace was moved upfront and scored vs palace, Chelsea and arsenal. Against qpr was played as a right winger near enough to accommodate Elia. I know he scored but then against west ham was played deeper too and less effective. Would everyone agree his best position is upfront around pelle where he can do more damage. Can we accommodate that system and tadic?
That's a good question to be fair. I guess in modern football, its not as clear cut as either being a "winger" or a "centtre forward", same as Jay Rodriguez for example, "Wide attacker", Part of a front 3 etc. I guess we can afford to play Mane just off Pelle if we're getting plenty of width from our two full backs, then the usual midfield options of Wanyama, Schneiderlin and JWP/Davis.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On his YouTube video prior to signing, most of his goals and key interventions come from central striking positions rather than cutting inside from the wing.

 

It's just tricky tactically these days to play two up front

 

We're a squad that's very light on wingers, so 3 at the back with wing-backs might be our best bet these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mane is fast becoming one of my favourite players purely down to his desire to play in short sleeve shirts no matter how cold or wet it is.

 

He did it again in training today while the other wimps are wearing jackets, he's bad ass.

 

Haha. It's that weird golden stripe in his hair as well...at first I thought it looked stupid as anything...now (what with the amount he's now bringing to the team) I think it looks badass

Edited by eddie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mane is fast becoming one of my favourite players purely down to his desire to play in short sleeve shirts no matter how cold or wet it is.

 

He did it again in training today while the other wimps are wearing jackets, he's bad ass.

 

Haha. It's that weird golden stripe in his hair as well...at first I thought it looked stupid as anything...now (what with the amount he's now bringing to the team) I think it looks badass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When he first played for us he played as a winger almost. Then vs palace was moved upfront and scored vs palace, Chelsea and arsenal. Against qpr was played as a right winger near enough to accommodate Elia. I know he scored but then against west ham was played deeper too and less effective. Would everyone agree his best position is upfront around pelle where he can do more damage. Can we accommodate that system and tadic?

 

Yes. As the form striker the team has to be built around him (without sacrificing our defence)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are 2 fwd lineups id like us to test out..probably wont happen but here goes...Vic and morgan will be needed in the defensive role.

 

Elia Pelle Djuricic

......Mane

Vic Morgan

 

or

 

Elia Mane Djuricic

......Tadic

Vic Morgan

 

The reason why i would leave out Davis and jwp is when u have both Vic and Morgan in the team the 3rd midfielder needs to assist the striker a lot more and they just don't do that, they are not attacking enough (if we are winning they are both good to come on to close the game down). Having Djuricic in there is a risk as we really don't know what he's really like but Tadic is dreadful there and goes missing in most games when played on the right. I would really like us to go back to that 352 formation which worked both times we tried it, it seemed to suit Pelle a lot better but with the wingers we have now i don't think that would happen now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another reason why we are finding it hard of late to score goals is because teams have worked us out. Stick two players on Pelle and win the second ball. Teams know they can wind up Pelle. If you cut out the supply from and to Pelle then we will struggle to score.

 

We need other options and Djuricic, Mane, Long and even Elia make that possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...