Jump to content

Gaston Ramirez


thesaint sfc

Recommended Posts

What do we think are the long term plans for him? What with Rodrigues being out for so long I think it's a shame we didn't hang on to him and give him some more game time.

 

Has anyone seen him play whilst at Hull? I can see he's not exactly set the world alight...

 

Based on what he's produced and the amount he cost surely he must be one of our worst signings ever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More frustrating that he never filled his potential,he has the ability to be a great player and the home game against Villa he ran the show.

Maybe he is not suited for the prem,pity really as I really wanted him to succeed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, we'll always have the Aston Villa and Newcastle home games. Injuries hampered him first up, then he wasnt Poch's cup of tea and clearly not Koeman's either.

 

A real shame, as i will always maintain he is an excellent player, but i'm not sure he's cut out for the Prem - back to Italy or Spain and a decent career ahead of him would be the best move for all parties.

 

I'll always hold on to the ridiculous excitement of the day he finally signed as well, genuinely thought we had arrived!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have kept hold of him, as we're lacking strength in depth and would have given us the option of something different off the bench. It's not like he's been starting every game for Hull.

 

But ultimately, I expect him to be sold to an Italian or Spanish team in the summer for £4-5m, he's just not quite suited to the English game and his career is stalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Italian club will pay him what we are paying him, so we are stuck till his contract runs out when we will get nothing
Him not wanting to give up his wages is the only thing I can see that would keep him on our books. Just depends how important that is for him versus his career completely stagnating.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would have been a better option than Mayuka to come off the bench on sunday so in that respect letting him go was a mistake.

People saying he wouldn't defend, i disagree. I've definitely seen him track back for us in the past and get stuck in. Whatever happened to working with a player and getting them to adapt. I believe they call it management.

Oh well, he'll be sold and forgotten about and in a couple of years time he'll sign for Inter or Juventus or PSG or some such for £20million+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading your comments, this is depressing, but I can't lift the mood either. Agree he hasn't been effective in the Prem, and surely that is his own fault. Maybe he is the sort that needs a run of games or an arm around the shoulder and make to feel special, but I can't see him making a contribution at Saints, and his poor spell at Hull will put other Prem sides off. Will go back to italy or the continent somewhere, maybe back to South America, but if we are tied in to the contract, he is attached to us a la Tommy Forecast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it strange in the summer that he actually turned down Seville because he preferred to be eventually loaned out to Hull (that's what Seville said, he turned them down after everything was agreed), I mean what was that all about really, surely it can't be about money and Hull's European campaign was destined to be short lived.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would have been a better option than Mayuka to come off the bench on sunday so in that respect letting him go was a mistake.

People saying he wouldn't defend, i disagree. I've definitely seen him track back for us in the past and get stuck in. Whatever happened to working with a player and getting them to adapt. I believe they call it management.

Oh well, he'll be sold and forgotten about and in a couple of years time he'll sign for Inter or Juventus or PSG or some such for £20million+

I agree we should have held on to him as an option off the bench, but I don't think the club can be criticised for not managing or showing patience with him as a whole.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shame really, he's clearly a very talented player, in his first season here he showed flashes of brilliance, I remember the game against Villa when he was outstanding and thought he'd go on to be an amazing signing who we'd then sell for £30m or £40m. Unfortuantely it never really carried on and he was probably the wrong signing at the wrong time, he never stayed fit for long and not really had a long run in the team to establish himself. Unfortuantely he's another big money signing that hasn't worked out for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shame really, he's clearly a very talented player, in his first season here he showed flashes of brilliance, I remember the game against Villa when he was outstanding and thought he'd go on to be an amazing signing who we'd then sell for £30m or £40m. Unfortuantely it never really carried on and he was probably the wrong signing at the wrong time, he never stayed fit for long and not really had a long run in the team to establish himself. Unfortuantely he's another big money signing that hasn't worked out for us.

 

Yeah, hard to disagree with this really. I've defended the guy a lot, but sadly I can't see it happening for him here.

 

It's a shame, because there has been times where he has done some great stuff but for one reason or another things have just never clicked into place for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think we could really do with him right now with Tadic Mane and Pelle misfiring, would certainly rather have him on our bench than Hulls. Especially when our only "game changer" seems to be Mayuka and he is toilet.

 

Perhaps Hull wouldn't be totally unpleased to send him back to us, still a move I don't understand. Seville would have been much better for him. Perhaps he'll get more game time at Hull when (and if) Bruce gets sacked.

Edited by Window Cleaner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodrigues has been out for a long time tho. 37 years isn't it?

Dani only retired a couple of years ago, still only 34.

Surely you weren't referring to Peter, he's even older than me (by a distance).

 

I wonder whether the agreement to loan Gaston out at the last moment was a bit of a hasty decision by RK. Think he could still be a useful addition to the squad, playing in the hole. His big problem was that he gave away possession too often in my view, that and the fact he was always injured, jet lagged or other excuses (including family bereavement). He will be back next summer come what may, we'll see then what happens I guess, but would not be disappointed to see him back with us.

Edited by VectisSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seen him 3 or 4 times for Hull and he's the same old Gaston. Flashes of brilliance and then ruins it with poor decision making, dawdling on the ball or just flat out not really trying. I don't think we are missing much (apart from the big pile of money we pay him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always remember WGS using the term "propaganda football" once to describe one of our games where we did a lot of pretty stuff which ultimately led to nothing.

 

Sadly that is the perfect description of Gaston; a propaganda footballer. You cannot deny that he has got great technique and looks so comfortable on the ball. But he just doesn't produce the goods anywhere near enough.

 

Having said all that, he is our player after all, and if injuries, lack of form etc dictate, then he may well come back. We'll have to wait and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is it going to take for people to realise he is a complete and utter waste of money?

 

I love all the " he is clearly talented" posts that appear every now and then . " Clearly" , he is not good enough . Mr Woo was talented and skilful but that doesn't make him a talented footballer and neither is Gaston. Clearly an over rated waste of money.

 

Awaiting the " he was brilliant against Villa replies" lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the key thing is that even being a little short of attacking players back in August, Koeman appeared to have no hesitation in letting him go to Hull. So whatever we think of him and whatever he did against Villa, Koeman had a good look at him when he first arrived, including in Premier League situations, and made the decision to allow the loan move. It's possible non-playing factors are also at work (I don't remember what the wage situation is with his loan, or if we even know), but I remember being surprised enough at the loan move that I thought 'well Koeman obviously has no plans for him then'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this ''could have done a job for us'' if he was still here and on the bench isn't really true, to be honest.

 

We all hope he could, we all wished to hell he could make that pass we all say he can make....but the general reality is that he'd be pretty useless on our bench as he didn't influence things for us, just left on the wayside in the premier league.

 

For me, he's never, ever the sort of player I'd want to bring on to change the course of a game we're struggling in. He'd hardly make an impact, which we saw time and time again. If we're winning and there's lots of space, maybe, but in tight games - no chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly that is the perfect description of Gaston; a propaganda footballer. You cannot deny that he has got great technique and looks so comfortable on the ball. But he just doesn't produce the goods anywhere near enough.

 

I know what you're saying, but I don't know if we've seen enough of him to really make that judgement. We've only got 10/15 minute cameos and one or two starts to judge him. Not sure he was ever given a proper chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this ''could have done a job for us'' if he was still here and on the bench isn't really true, to be honest.

 

We all hope he could, we all wished to hell he could make that pass we all say he can make....but the general reality is that he'd be pretty useless on our bench as he didn't influence things for us, just left on the wayside in the premier league.

 

For me, he's never, ever the sort of player I'd want to bring on to change the course of a game we're struggling in. He'd hardly make an impact, which we saw time and time again. If we're winning and there's lots of space, maybe, but in tight games - no chance.

 

That's the very point though, bringing him on in the last 10-15 minutes often changed things for the better, with his vision passing and fluidity, which is even more baffling we didn't give him a proper start.

 

I'm no Gaston lover, if he never plays for us again then so be it, but he clearly has talent and looked dangerous when brought on towards the end of games. So, it's a strange one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it strange in the summer that he actually turned down Seville because he preferred to be eventually loaned out to Hull (that's what Seville said, he turned them down after everything was agreed), I mean what was that all about really, surely it can't be about money and Hull's European campaign was destined to be short lived.

 

Hull were knocked out of Europe the week before GR signed for Hull. Which was on the last day of the transfer window (1st Sept) a couple of days after he came on at West Ham and played quite well IMHO. I was very surprised that we let him go after appearing to be in Ron' plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

but he clearly has talent and looked dangerous when brought on towards the end of games. So, it's a strange one.

 

We should start Gaston bingo.

 

" clearly has talent "

 

" Aston Villa"

 

" Dangerous when he came on"

 

" tired from world cup/copa America/international football/no preseason."

 

" Young"

 

" In a foreign country"

 

Any more?

 

I do agree he looked" dangerous when he came on" a few times, unfortunately the danger was coinciding a goal after he'd given it away cheaply.

 

Has their ever been a player so over rated after delivering such little value for money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All 3 of those have done a hell of a lot more than he's ever done.

 

Less goals, less assists, less skill. Ramirez has 34 caps for Uruguay, quite clearly he's better. Tadic is the only one who's arguably better, hence saying knackered Tadic, he's a waste of space atm. Long's as average as everyone knew he was, Mane's garbage. Really dissapointed with Mane, I was set to be a fanboy because he has such a lulzy name but he's but he's ****. Tadic is the only one of our permanent signings from the summer who's actually worth the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Less goals, less assists, less skill. Ramirez has 34 caps for Uruguay, quite clearly he's better. Tadic is the only one who's arguably better, hence saying knackered Tadic, he's a waste of space atm. Long's as average as everyone knew he was, Mane's garbage. Really dissapointed with Mane, I was set to be a fanboy because he has such a lulzy name but he's but he's ****. Tadic is the only one of our permanent signings from the summer who's actually worth the money.

 

Ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shame really, he's clearly a very talented player, in his first season here he showed flashes of brilliance, I remember the game against Villa when he was outstanding and thought he'd go on to be an amazing signing who we'd then sell for £30m or £40m. Unfortuantely it never really carried on and he was probably the wrong signing at the wrong time, he never stayed fit for long and not really had a long run in the team to establish himself. Unfortuantely he's another big money signing that hasn't worked out for us.

 

Thats pretty sad when a fan's ambition for a player at his club is for the player to be sold for a decent price at a later date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could certainly do with him and Osvaldo on the bench at the moment. We have nothing on the bench at the mo in terms of gamechangers, Foolish decision to let petty squabbles get in the way of business.

 

So if you were assaulted at work you wouldn't have the problem with the guy who did it keeping his job and working with you every day because he was useful to have about. Team unity is more important than having a 2 goals a season striker on the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this ''could have done a job for us'' if he was still here and on the bench isn't really true, to be honest.

 

We all hope he could, we all wished to hell he could make that pass we all say he can make....but the general reality is that he'd be pretty useless on our bench as he didn't influence things for us, just left on the wayside in the premier league.

 

For me, he's never, ever the sort of player I'd want to bring on to change the course of a game we're struggling in. He'd hardly make an impact, which we saw time and time again. If we're winning and there's lots of space, maybe, but in tight games - no chance.

 

Brilliant assist for AL in last years home game against West Brom when were really struggling to break them down. FWIW I think he's a half decent player but he just hasn't produced consistently since we bought him. Shame really but hey-ho....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An expensive mistake, and yet another lesson to all of those who easily get carried away. Reminiscent of the Steve de Ridder YouTube clips debacle.

 

I missed this youtube clips debacle - was there a compilation of how ****e he was for us or was it more people getting excited before we signed him from existing youtube videos?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

like others have said and several people warned before we signed him he simply isn't suited to British football and especially not the premiership! same as osvaldo get what we can for him which will be far less than half of what we paid and draw a line under it, they are both dead wood!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Less goals, less assists, less skill. Ramirez has 34 caps for Uruguay, quite clearly he's better. Tadic is the only one who's arguably better, hence saying knackered Tadic, he's a waste of space atm. Long's as average as everyone knew he was, Mane's garbage. Really dissapointed with Mane, I was set to be a fanboy because he has such a lulzy name but he's but he's ****. Tadic is the only one of our permanent signings from the summer who's actually worth the money.

 

.....I think, quite a few of those are late sub-appearances, he rarely starts a game for Uruguay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...