Smirking_Saint Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 The destabilising impact if this story alone is probably going to be worth ten or eleven league points, a real hammer blow to our Champions League challenge. So, money well spent by whichever club it is paying journalists to make up stories about us, which is definitely happening and no mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 He'd be mad to go to City. Thing is with footballers, they always believe they're good enough (money helps) so the likelihood of him spending years on the bench won't put him off. I like him and hope he stays. Personally I think he owes us after the rehab of his injury. From his perspective the trebled wages would be a big consideration. As for oweing us, you could argue a 20m fee for someone you bought for 6-7m means he owes us nothing. We would (and have) been mutully beneficial for each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 What's all this "he owes us nothing" bollix? We gave him a contract and stage to perform on. We as a club owe him nothing, and he "owes" us more than we do him, that is, if anyone owes anyone anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saints foreva Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 He'd be mad to go to City. Thing is with footballers, they always believe they're good enough (money helps) so the likelihood of him spending years on the bench won't put him off. I like him and hope he stays. Personally I think he owes us after the rehab of his injury. Agree with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 What's all this "he owes us nothing" bollix? We gave him a contract and stage to perform on. We as a club owe him nothing, and he "owes" us more than we do him, that is, if anyone owes anyone anything. We don't owe him nor does he owe us. Him joining us has been great for both parties whatever happens now which is either he plays for us (preferred) or we make a big profit on him. Injuries happen all the time, we rehab him because he is currently our player and its obviously in our interests to have him fit and in his interests to get fit quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 so why bring up "he owes us nothing" then? Just spouting typical bollix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanimal Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 Apparently his recently built house near Romsey is on the market….. Alderley Edge here he comes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 What's all this "he owes us nothing" bollix? We gave him a contract and stage to perform on. We as a club owe him nothing, and he "owes" us more than we do him, that is, if anyone owes anyone anything. Nobody owes anything to anyone We paid him money, he performed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanimal Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 Apparently his recently built house near Romsey is on the market… Alderley Edge here he comes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 16 November, 2014 Author Share Posted 16 November, 2014 I Think You're all jumping the gun. Jay-Rod will do nothing until he knows he has completely recovered from his career ending injury. He will not be leaving in January unless Saints believe it's in their interests. when was the last time a top player ended his career with his first injury like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 when was the last time a top player ended his career with his first injury like this? Ashton Haarland Holden (all but) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 (edited) so why bring up "he owes us nothing" then? Just spouting typical bollix What are you on about? Someone said he owes us because we rehabbed his injury. I said he doesn't owe us and we don't owe him. Edited 16 November, 2014 by Saint Charlie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Balls Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 From his perspective the trebled wages would be a big consideration. As for oweing us, you could argue a 20m fee for someone you bought for 6-7m means he owes us nothing. We would (and have) been mutully beneficial for each other. Like I said, personally I feel he does. Something puts my nose out of joint a bit having taken a chance on him to bring him to the PL, turn him into an international footballer, help him through the rehab (obviously an obligation), offer him a lengthy contract when still injured just for him to jump ship right away to sit on someone's bench. Just my personal opinion. Anyway, not happened yet.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lallana's Left Peg Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 Like I said, personally I feel he does. Something puts my nose out of joint a bit having taken a chance on him to bring him to the PL, turn him into an international footballer, help him through the rehab (obviously an obligation), offer him a lengthy contract when still injured just for him to jump ship right away to sit on someone's bench. Just my personal opinion. Anyway, not happened yet.... But conversely he's also upheld his end of the bargain in every way, so I am not sure how / why he would owe us anything. He's been a model professional and played his part in the clubs success over the last two seasons. It's been a mutually beneficial relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Bateman Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 No surprise we're not putting him.on display before the window. Well we can't when he's nowhere near fitness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 I've got no idea if true or not, but is he Man City's quality? Are the newspaper articles suggesting a January sale? Are there that many teams that will be happy sinking big money in a player who has had so long off for such a serious injury? I guess he helps with the homegrown quota. This is what I was thinking. JRod is good but not that good and nobody yet knows if he will be as good as he was before the injury. Got Scott Sinclair/Alan Johnson/Jack Rodwell written all over it if the reports are of course true and he decides to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 Ashton Haarland Holden (all but) That Haaland injury really boils my p*ss. After all the ched evans rape stuff and "he shouldn't be allowed near football anymore", I don't understand how that rabid pitbull known as roy keane can still stalk the airwaves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingsland Red Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 If any club is mad enough to offer top dollar for JRod, I can see the club taking it. Gazza and Shearer ( I think) were never the same after a similar injury, and as Ron like his wingers to be 'nippy' and Jay would not displace Graziano, I'm not sure where he would fit in….. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 16 November, 2014 Author Share Posted 16 November, 2014 If any club is mad enough to offer top dollar for JRod, I can see the club taking it. Gazza and Shearer ( I think) were never the same after a similar injury, and as Ron like his wingers to be 'nippy' and Jay would not displace Graziano, I'm not sure where he would fit in….. If he gets back to anything like last season. In place of mane I would have thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilsmer Posted 16 November, 2014 Share Posted 16 November, 2014 If any club is mad enough to offer top dollar for JRod, I can see the club taking it. Gazza and Shearer ( I think) were never the same after a similar injury, and as Ron like his wingers to be 'nippy' and Jay would not displace Graziano, I'm not sure where he would fit in….. A vast majority of Shearer's career (and goals) came after his acl injury. Personally I think J Rod will still be here after January and I hope he can reach the same level he reached last season. For those people questioning whether he'd get into our team or suggesting we sell him in order to buy someone else, I think you're mad. All of the players that Ronald inherited have improved this season and I think J-Rod especially could flourish under the new system. We may be doing better than any of us could have imagined but we'll be better still if Koeman has a fully fit Rodriguez at his disposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 17 November, 2014 Share Posted 17 November, 2014 That Haaland injury really boils my p*ss. After all the ched evans rape stuff and "he shouldn't be allowed near football anymore", I don't understand how that rabid pitbull known as roy keane can still stalk the airwaves. Very true scotty, footballs full of grade a w*nkers. The game has no morals. I expect Mr Evans to play his first game after xmas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nta786 Posted 17 November, 2014 Share Posted 17 November, 2014 Lol btw Batman, can you provide some links/tell mw ehich papers are linking Jay to City? Cheers mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarniaSaint Posted 17 November, 2014 Share Posted 17 November, 2014 Hey guys........if he goes he goes but on our terms ...... so another ex-Burnley replaced by another.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 17 November, 2014 Share Posted 17 November, 2014 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/southampton-want-harry-kane-andros-4644397 Apparantly any deal to spurs would need to include both Townsend and Kane If he was to leave Id definately take that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarniaSaint Posted 17 November, 2014 Share Posted 17 November, 2014 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/southampton-want-harry-kane-andros-4644397 Apparantly any deal to spurs would need to include both Townsend and Kane If he was to leave Id definately take that Kane ......maybe But Townsend NFW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 Mail is running this as an either or not both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWD Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 I'm definitely of the view that Jay should show a sense of loyalty to the club after so much has been spent on his rehabilitation. I know it's an obligation but if my office spent loads of money trying to train me to achieve a promotion, I would then feel a bit bad if I upped and left. That said, I actually think Shane Long is as good a player as Rodriguez (I understand this may not be a widely held belief!) and if we get £20m for a player that hasn't played for 6 months then that's actually good business. I like Jay, and think we are stronger with him in the squad, but we could replace him fairly easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/southampton-want-harry-kane-andros-4644397 Apparantly any deal to spurs would need to include both Townsend and Kane If he was to leave Id definately take that Kane yes, but not Towsend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hasper57saint Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 Wait and see.Jay is still 'in training'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 CWD, he is an asset and there's little value to be had in not mending him properly, so not sure he owes us anything if it means a large transfer fee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 Here's the Mail's piece http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2838478/Harry-Kane-Andros-Townsend-demanded-Southampton-Tottenham-want-sign-Jay-Rodriguez-January.html Definite "or" while Mirror has a definite "and". Somewhat of a difference!!! So who is talking ballox? The Mirror, The Mail or both? Certainly if JRod is valued at £20m, then the Mail is way of with their values. As we are an "unwilling" seller, the price will be higher for Spurs than if we were trying to shift him like they are with half their players, so the Mirror might be closer. But I get the feeling that JRod isn't going to be with us and he is now a pawn in this great game of transfer fees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sour Mash Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/southampton-want-harry-kane-andros-4644397 Apparantly any deal to spurs would need to include both Townsend and Kane If he was to leave Id definately take that I'm still not sure I'd definitely take that. How many Premier League games has Kane started in his career? And I'm not a fan of Townsend at all. On the other hand it would give us a fair bit of depth to our squad and would hit Spurs in a way - their fans would be up in arms if they got rid of Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 And we might be getting a little low on Home Grown players (over 21) so there is a benefit in taking them both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 I'm still not sure I'd definitely take that. How many Premier League games has Kane started in his career? And I'm not a fan of Townsend at all. On the other hand it would give us a fair bit of depth to our squad and would hit Spurs in a way - their fans would be up in arms if they got rid of Kane. AGREE totally Sour Mash. I think Kane is a good prospect,and would be a good addition to the sqaud, but I've never been convinced about Townsend, although he has a good turn of pace and has scored a few spectacular goals - he doesn't look like a 90 minute team player to me) ......plus (as I have argued before on this site), rarely do London-based players seem to " settle down" to the mindset of life on the South Coast. Historically, the list of unsatisfactory buys outweighs those who actually DAJFU. IF we were to carry through a deal like that ..but it would be a win-win situation for Saints - even if only one was a success. Tottenham would take all the (financial) risk, but then again they seem to have money to burn anyway, and perhaps they " owe us a bit back" morally-speaking...for the Bale deal. The big question however, is not ours to answer. That is the fitness issue with Jay Rod. I do like him as a player, (even when he was at Burnley), and IMO he got a raw deal when signed by Adkins and was stuck out to rot on the left wing. His real success came in a more traditional striker role. No-one can doubt his class when you see his performances just prior to his unfortunate injury but now he must firstly, regain 100% fitness, and the form that he once had. Thereby lies the key to success or failure. Fans can be notoriously fickle - if a new signing doesn't show success from Day 1 (as could be seen with the "mixed reactions " on this site after Pelle's first few games). Everything takes time. I genuinely wish Jay Rod well (whether he stays or goes), but I think the success he's had was in part due to the side he played in..... rather than just individual skill / talent. Looking back 10 years, and the success and acclaim that James Beattie had....we all recall the rapid downfall that followed his disasterous move to Everton. I'd hate the same to happen to Jay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 You mention that those coming from London historically struggle on the south coast, but I was wondering how many players have left us, when fully developed (ie not a teenager learning like Bale, Ox, Walcott) and gone on to better things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxstone Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 I'm still not sure I'd definitely take that. How many Premier League games has Kane started in his career? And I'm not a fan of Townsend at all. On the other hand it would give us a fair bit of depth to our squad and would hit Spurs in a way - their fans would be up in arms if they got rid of Kane. The Spuds fans would be absolutely livid! I live and work amongst loads of them, and they currently regard Levy as highly as most of the Saints fans did Lowe at his absolute nadir. To them, Kane is the only spark in their season so far and to exchange him for a recovering ACL casualty (as good as JayRod is) would signal a mobilisation of pitchforks and burning torches at White Hart Lane! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 18 November, 2014 Author Share Posted 18 November, 2014 would love it if we got Kane (not that we will) he is loved by spurs fans as is a rare local boy for them... he is having a very good season and for some reason, MP wont really give him a run in the league he is going to be a very good player... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 Kane yes, but not Towsend. Kane Id take definately, I think he has the potential to be a v good player. Townsend Im a bit Meh about. We are linked with two wingers that are similar, one being Redmond and the other Townsend. Im sure there is better out there than those two, but if I had to pick one it would probably be townsend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KelvinsRightGlove Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 would love it if we got Kane (not that we will) he is loved by spurs fans as is a rare local boy for them... he is having a very good season and for some reason, MP wont really give him a run in the league he is going to be a very good player... I've said before I think Kane has it in him to be a v decent player, and I would have no objection to him coming to Saints (don't think it is very likely). However, whilst he has scored some goals, it's what? One heavily deflected free-kick in the league? The rest have come in the cups against lesser teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Pete Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 It would still be a major surprise to me if either Spurs or Man City are prepared to take a gamble on signing Jay until he has come back properly and proved that he can still be the player he was last season after such a serious injury. I know they can do medicals but surely they do not tell the whole story about how his body is going to react to tackling, playing 2 games in a week, etc? Only when he is back playing regular premier league football will they truly know what they are buying. So I think a lot will depend on the timing of his comeback for us, and how he looks when he does come back. That said, I suppose you can never rule anything out with Spurs - if they are desperate enough, they may still take the risk?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Jeff Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 would love it if we got Kane (not that we will) he is loved by spurs fans as is a rare local boy for them... he is having a very good season and for some reason, MP wont really give him a run in the league he is going to be a very good player... They have a couple of local boys in and around the first team though...although they do seem to like Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Saint Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 AGREE totally Sour Mash. I think Kane is a good prospect,and would be a good addition to the sqaud, but I've never been convinced about Townsend, although he has a good turn of pace and has scored a few spectacular goals - he doesn't look like a 90 minute team player to me) ......plus (as I have argued before on this site), rarely do London-based players seem to " settle down" to the mindset of life on the South Coast. Historically, the list of unsatisfactory buys outweighs those who actually DAJFU. IF we were to carry through a deal like that ..but it would be a win-win situation for Saints - even if only one was a success. Tottenham would take all the (financial) risk, but then again they seem to have money to burn anyway, and perhaps they " owe us a bit back" morally-speaking...for the Bale deal. The big question however, is not ours to answer. That is the fitness issue with Jay Rod. I do like him as a player, (even when he was at Burnley), and IMO he got a raw deal when signed by Adkins and was stuck out to rot on the left wing. His real success came in a more traditional striker role. No-one can doubt his class when you see his performances just prior to his unfortunate injury but now he must firstly, regain 100% fitness, and the form that he once had. Thereby lies the key to success or failure. Fans can be notoriously fickle - if a new signing doesn't show success from Day 1 (as could be seen with the "mixed reactions " on this site after Pelle's first few games). Everything takes time. I genuinely wish Jay Rod well (whether he stays or goes), but I think the success he's had was in part due to the side he played in..... rather than just individual skill / talent. Looking back 10 years, and the success and acclaim that James Beattie had....we all recall the rapid downfall that followed his disasterous move to Everton. I'd hate the same to happen to Jay. How can Townsend have scored a 'few' spectacular goals. He has only scored 1 in his entire Tottenham career (and 2 for England). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 would love it if we got Kane (not that we will) he is loved by spurs fans as is a rare local boy for them... he is having a very good season and for some reason, MP wont really give him a run in the league he is going to be a very good player...i'm one of the few who dont rate him. To be fair i havent seen lots of him though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 i'm one of the few who dont rate him. To be fair i havent seen lots of him though Not sure if you're joking or not, but doesn't that kind of nullify your ''not rating him' opinion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 Sell him and use a fraction of the money to bring in Huntelaar and Konoplyanka at knock down prices (both free agents next summer) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 How can Townsend have scored a 'few' spectacular goals. He has only scored 1 in his entire Tottenham career (and 2 for England). Of course there isn't a lot of goal history to analyse, but since he was 18, he's had 9 different loan-out (all lower league) and managed a career total of 12 league goals. He seems to have a reputation for good solo efforts at almost every loan club, and came to fame with a couple of memorable strikes whilst on loan at QPR,..... and of course that debut goal for England. .......so I repeat he has scored a few spectacular goals, but 12 goals from 130-odd apps. isn't such a good return and certainly not for the valuation he seemingly commands. Overall . I'm not greatly impressed. Would MUCH prefer Harry Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 You'd get Depay for around 12-14m Much better option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Katalinic's 'tache Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 Is Jay Rod actually nearing any sort of return. Barely mentioned by Saints in these heady days... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 Is Jay Rod actually nearing any sort of return. Barely mentioned by Saints in these heady days... The latest on a random website, in which the author claims to have spoken to people at the club, is that he's got some swelling on the knee so is looking at January now. But yeah, I also find the official club silence on Jay quite telling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 18 November, 2014 Share Posted 18 November, 2014 You'd get Depay for around 12-14m Much better option Not sure you would. He is seriously highly rated and Spurs were linked a lot at 18m in the summer. He wouldn't come here (unless we were CL). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now