Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Senderos has picked up yet another injury on international duty.

 

Out of the international games, and a doubt for the game against us.

 

Shame, he's not very good anymore.

Posted

0-2 at half time please, get Morgan and Pelle off to avoid them picking up more cards, settle back for a comfortable victory.

 

Oh, and if I could have a Ferrari 458 as well that would be great, cheers.

Posted
Looking at the league table for over two weeks will only drive me nuts. Darn these international breaks!

 

Print it out and casually leave it lying about...that's a good one.

Posted

We have no excuses for not getting at least a point. Villa will battle hard, but ultimately lack quality. A draw would be acceptable but we need to be winning games like this

Posted
Ron Vlaar has set down and looks injured, Stefan de Vrij set to come on. Aston Villa fans won't be best pleased.

 

 

Shame

Losing Benteke will help us a bit. Losing Vlaar would be massive for us. Still plenty of time til the game for cover though.

Posted
Losing Benteke will help us a bit. Losing Vlaar would be massive for us. Still plenty of time til the game for cover though.

 

Delph massive miss for them as well. We can't lose!

Posted
We have no excuses for not getting at least a point. Villa will battle hard, but ultimately lack quality. A draw would be acceptable but we need to be winning games like this

 

Villa really are terrible. We should expect to win this game quite comfortably....

Posted
Villa really are terrible. We should expect to win this game quite comfortably....

 

I wouldn't expect to win any Premier League game comfortably, especially away from home. Just look at how close QPR and Leicester pushed us in our own back yard.

 

I'd put us down as favourites but I think any 'expectations' may come around to bite us on the arse.

Posted

Although Villa are terrible....Spurs and Liverpool aren't much better and we lost to them. If we play to our potential we will win. If we turn up and give less than 100% then we may still win but I wouldn't be surprised if we lost. If we are going to be a top 4 team we need to win these types of games. Unfortunately I still can't bring myself to believe this isn't the Saints of old so I'm apprehensive about this game

Posted (edited)
He has actually been ok for them.... Which was surprising

 

Insomuch as anyone playing in a team that's lost 7 out of their last 8 games can be described as "OK" I presume. There are no good players in bad teams. Every player is eventually dragged down to the level of the mass.

Edited by Window Cleaner
Posted
Although Villa are terrible....Spurs and Liverpool aren't much better and we lost to them. If we play to our potential we will win. If we turn up and give less than 100% then we may still win but I wouldn't be surprised if we lost. If we are going to be a top 4 team we need to win these types of games. Unfortunately I still can't bring myself to believe this isn't the Saints of old so I'm apprehensive about this game

 

TBF Liverpool really miss Sturridge and he played against us.

Posted
Villa really are terrible. We should expect to win this game quite comfortably....

 

They drew away to West Ham in their last game who are 4th in table, so hopefully the team won't be taking such as complacent attitude!

Posted
They drew away to West Ham in their last game who are 4th in table, so hopefully the team won't be taking such as complacent attitude!

 

Although since then they've lost their first choice centre back partnership to injury...

Posted
Insomuch as anyone playing in a team that's lost 7 out of their last 8 games can be described as "OK" I presume. There are no good players in bad teams. Every player is eventually dragged down to the level of the mass.

 

Le Tissier...?

Posted
Insomuch as anyone playing in a team that's lost 7 out of their last 8 games can be described as "OK" I presume. There are no good players in bad teams. Every player is eventually dragged down to the level of the mass.

 

What about David Marshall? Was very good last year. In our first season in the Prem, Rickie, Lallana and Schneiderlin were all pretty good and we were in the bottom half the whole season, James McCarthy was great for Wigan in the year they went down, Charlie Austin has been good for QPR although they're struggling as a team, and as mentioned - our very own Matt le Tis....

Posted
What about David Marshall? Was very good last year. In our first season in the Prem, Rickie, Lallana and Schneiderlin were all pretty good and we were in the bottom half the whole season, James McCarthy was great for Wigan in the year they went down, Charlie Austin has been good for QPR although they're struggling as a team, and as mentioned - our very own Matt le Tis....

 

You can make a case for anyone who you think is a respectable performer but if their efforts do not improve the results of the team, ie W,L or D not whether they get beaten

1 nil or 10 nil, then their performances count for nothing because the team is in itself bad, be it because some of the players are bad or the manager doesn't have a dicky what he's doing or has failed to instill the correct team spirit in the players. Look at us last season, we were only as good at the end of the day as Gazzaniga and Jos at times.

What I believe we are seeing in the PL at the moment is a sort of equilibriation of "bad players", everybody gets enough money not to have donkeys all over the pitch although some teams haven't yet weeded out all of their crap.

Posted
You can make a case for anyone who you think is a respectable performer but if their efforts do not improve the results of the team, ie W,L or D not whether they get beaten

1 nil or 10 nil, then their performances count for nothing because the team is in itself bad, be it because some of the players are bad or the manager doesn't have a dicky what he's doing or has failed to instill the correct team spirit in the players. Look at us last season, we were only as good at the end of the day as Gazzaniga and Jos at times.

What I believe we are seeing in the PL at the moment is a sort of equilibriation of "bad players", everybody gets enough money not to have donkeys all over the pitch although some teams haven't yet weeded out all of their crap.

 

Yeah but you just said there are no good players in bad teams which is quite clearly nonsense. One player might not be responsible for the result of the team and it doesn't make them a bad player.

Posted
Insomuch as anyone playing in a team that's lost 7 out of their last 8 games can be described as "OK" I presume. There are no good players in bad teams. Every player is eventually dragged down to the level of the mass.

6 losses out of 7 actually, and 4 of those were in succession against Arse, Citeh, Chelski, and Everton. True, their two most recent losses were against shite teams (QPR and Spurs), but that could be because they were in a slump from their previous nightmare run. Most recently, an away draw against in-form Wham suggests that they could be pulling out of their slump. They did also start the season well, winning at Anfield for example.

Posted

I'm guessing if Schneiderlin and Davis are still injured then we'll see Reed get his chance to start, with Long in for Tadic if he doesn't recover.

 

Cork - Wanyama - Reed

 

Long - Pelle - Mane

 

You'd expect some of them to be fit though. Works in our favour that the game is on Monday actually.

Posted
I'm guessing if Schneiderlin and Davis are still injured then we'll see Reed get his chance to start, with Long in for Tadic if he doesn't recover.

 

Cork - Wanyama - Reed

 

Long - Pelle - Mane

 

You'd expect some of them to be fit though. Works in our favour that the game is on Monday actually.

 

Not enough creativity in that midfield IMO. If Tadic is fit then I'd put him in the centre, behind Pelle. He can be just as effective there I think was on the wing while Wanyama and Cork guard the back 4. That's if Morgan and Davis aren't fit of course.

Posted
I'm guessing if Schneiderlin and Davis are still injured then we'll see Reed get his chance to start, with Long in for Tadic if he doesn't recover.

 

Cork - Wanyama - Reed

 

Long - Pelle - Mane

 

You'd expect some of them to be fit though. Works in our favour that the game is on Monday actually.

 

This highlights the idiocy and naivety of not signing Cork on a permanent contract - who would be in if Cork wasnt here

Posted
This highlights the idiocy and naivety of not signing Cork on a permanent contract - who would be in if Cork wasnt here

 

Someone else who we would sign in the summer, no doubt.

Posted
This highlights the idiocy and naivety of not signing Cork on a permanent contract - who would be in if Cork wasnt here

Totally agree. Although how many teams who play a midfield three could boast the depth we have in that position?

 

Davis - Wanayama - Schniederlin

 

JWP - Cork - Reed

Posted
This highlights the idiocy and naivety of not signing Cork on a permanent contract - who would be in if Cork wasnt here

 

Taider. Maybe. Probably Not.

Posted
Alderwerield.

 

We'd miss him at the back, big time.

 

I think I've read Gardos can play there and his ball distribution seems pretty good. I'd rather keep Alderweireld at CB.

Posted
Someone else who we would sign in the summer, no doubt.

 

Indeed. If we think we can sign better then go for it. Cork would easily get into most mid table premiership teams so no worries about him

Posted
I'm guessing if Schneiderlin and Davis are still injured then we'll see Reed get his chance to start, with Long in for Tadic if he doesn't recover.

 

Cork - Wanyama - Reed

 

This highlights the idiocy and naivety of not signing Cork on a permanent contract - who would be in if Cork wasnt here

 

reed

 

Have we got two Reeds now? Excellent.

 

harrison reed. ffs

 

CWD's line-up already had Reed in it.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...