Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Gallagher is long term injury.

 

Isgrove isn't a striker.

 

I thought Gallagher has been back in first-team training for a couple of weeks now?

 

Bringing Gallagher on for Pelle (if needed) would disrupt our style of play much less than bringing Mayuka on IMO. Hope to see both him and Isgrove involved mid-week anyway.

Posted
looks a draw will put us 2nd....

 

could be a big win today for us

 

A WHU Citeh draw would be good, a win for us takes us to 2nd and a gap between us and WHU.

 

Sounds like Citeh laying seige on Hammers goal.

Posted

Just thinking, if this was Saints in the same position under Poch, I wouldn't have felt we had any counter attack under the battering. The current side, like WHam, and definitely like our side in the 80s, have the counter attack.

Posted
A WHU Citeh draw would be good, a win for us takes us to 2nd and a gap between us and WHU.

 

Sounds like Citeh laying seige on Hammers goal.

 

They are, but the TV commentators are completely ignoring the fact that Wham have had a few decent attacks and been in the City half a fair bit, during this battering

Posted (edited)
I thought Gallagher has been back in first-team training for a couple of weeks now?

 

Bringing Gallagher on for Pelle (if needed) would disrupt our style of play much less than bringing Mayuka on IMO. Hope to see both him and Isgrove involved mid-week anyway.

 

Gallagher tweeted a picture of him after an operation in the last week.

 

Edited by St Chalet
Posted

Well, Spam have beaten Liverpool and City, and we beat them - thinking about it, they might have had a few injuries. They're as much a sensation, short term or otherwise as us. Could even argue they're doing better. Makes Stoke even more crucial - cmon Saints, don't squib on us!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...