Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Been away for an enjoyable week off and come back and it seems i've missed all the fun, even if nothing else changes, such as , Daren Wheeler getting hyper defensive and hyper long in his own defence instead of forumulating a coherent and expletive free argument about the future of the club without causing it any damage in the short term. Then we have Chorley once again reverting to type. Might get himself a reputation as a bit if a coin throwing thug if he is not careful.

 

The only surprising thing is that the more intelligent anti-Lowe poster such as Wes Tender, Chap in the Chapel etc seem to think it is appropriate to align themselves or worse salute a person who alledgedly is a bigger Man U fan than a Saint. Wes, I for one can't read your views dispassionatley and with reason when you seem to support this alledgedly ex-football hooligan who clearly still has a few old traits lurking in his pschye. If we attribute political credentials to the protaganists then Chorley is more Dennis Skinner than a Tony Benn and really just a bit of an old rogue, a parody of a Saints fan today who shouldn't been seen let alone heard.

 

I didn't spot this post at first but can't really let it go without offering my own comment. I've never met Richard Chorley and, for the record, think SISA is presently a bit too politically motivated to be a group that supporters who are broadly ill-disposed towards Rupert Lowe et al can unite behind. I don't think that symbolic gestures are as helpful as reasoned debate either. Therefore, while Richard Chorley and I would probably agree that we don't think that Rupert Lowe and Michael Wilde are the right people to be taking SFC forward, I wouldn't say that I align myself directly to SISA or Richard Chorley or approve of provocative gestures such as the coin incident. Richard Chorley's time would have been better spent asking tough questions from the floor rather than getting himself ejected. He's evidently a clever bloke and capable, I think, of giving the board a tough examination. Sorry for putting this on the main board as it is probably better suited to being a PM, but I can't do that in this instance.

Edited by Chap in the Chapel
A small addition needed making.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...