Delmary Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 (edited) http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11128 Full article removed but tagged onto http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/articles/article.php?page_id=11126 I wonder why? Sums up SFC. Who cares about RC. Lowe's playing his silly games again. What else happened at the AGM Rupert? If Lowe authorised this article then he really has lost the plot. FFS grow-up. Rupert stop trying to divert attention, the majority of Saints fans think RC is a t*sser just like you. Edited 23 December, 2008 by Delmary Link change
benjii Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Bizarre isn't it?! Can we expect an OS article every time a fan gets nicked?
saint1977 Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Richard shouldn't have done that though. If that was an opposition fan throwing it at Kelvin we would want the book thrown at them. Lowe has behaved appallingly today but there's still no excuse for what Richard did. He needs to have a long look at himself as he's embarrassed himself on a citywide and possibly local scale.
benjii Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Richard shouldn't have done that though. If that was an opposition fan throwing it at Kelvin we would want the book thrown at them. Lowe has behaved appallingly today but there's still no excuse for what Richard did. He needs to have a long look at himself as he's embarrassed himself on a citywide and possibly local scale. Fine. But why does that deserve its own article when the key issues discussed at the meeting are ignored?
saint1977 Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Bizarre isn't it?! Can we expect an OS article every time a fan gets nicked? I agree but there's a lot of history between Rupert and Richard. People will now focus on that rather than Rupert's wacky and unprofessional behaviour today. I know Richard is passionate but that really didn't help today.
derry Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Not going to the police!! Bearing in mind 95% of the witnesses hated him, that's no surprise. Prat!
Leslie Charteris Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 There is a big difference between aiming a coin from the stands and chucking a handful of change in someone's lap shouting "Judas" or whatever. Can anyone describe exactly what happened?
saint1977 Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Fine. But why does that deserve its own article when the key issues discussed at the meeting are ignored? Answer: no. But Rupert was in a fighting mood today so I knew it would go up on the OS. It doesn't do Rupert any favours either and Martin Samuel's next article is going to be very interesting!
exit2 Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 We spoke about this earlier. WHat Rich should have done was buy some chocolate money and used that instead. I think a lot of people have overlooked the idea of the money representing the money Judas Iscariot was paid for betraying Jesus, his own reference to Michael Wilde's decision to support Lowe this year after originally ousting him. I thought it was very clever
saint1977 Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 There is a big difference between aiming a coin from the stands and chucking a handful of change in someone's lap shouting "Judas" or whatever. Can anyone describe exactly what happened? Not if it hit someone and it went to court it wouldn't. I'm disappointed it happened.
um pahars Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 LMFAO. You can tell it's panto season. Get this off the OS please:rolleyes::rolleyes:
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Richard shouldn't have done that though. If that was an opposition fan throwing it at Kelvin we would want the book thrown at them. Lowe has behaved appallingly today but there's still no excuse for what Richard did. He needs to have a long look at himself as he's embarrassed himself on a citywide and possibly local scale. He was representing the 30 pieces of silver. In hindsight he might have been better off buying some silver papered chocolate coins rather than using real ones, but the sentiment would still have been the same. He has shown himself to be a complete numpty many times in the past, but to be fair this time he has a valid point!!
Ponty Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 What's all the ******** about Judas though? If that was his story then he should've given the "30 pieces of silver" to Wilde, not Lowe.
Delmary Posted 23 December, 2008 Author Posted 23 December, 2008 We spoke about this earlier. WHat Rich should have done was buy some chocolate money and used that instead. I think a lot of people have overlooked the idea of the money representing the money Judas Iscariot was paid for betraying Jesus, his own reference to Michael Wilde's decision to support Lowe this year after originally ousting him. I thought it was very cleverBut Lowe is trying use RC's outburst for his own political ends. He must be very sad and desperate. The battle lines have now been drawn.
Thedelldays Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 But Lowe is trying use RC's outburst for his own political ends. He must be very sad and desperate. The battle lines have now been drawn. why is it sad...im sure it will be reported the other way in the press...every story has two sides y'know what battle lines ffs
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 What's all the ******** about Judas though? If that was his story then he should've given the "30 pieces of silver" to Wilde, not Lowe. He probably would have done if Wilde had bothered to attend the club's most important meeting of the year
Ponty Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 RC deserved banning for getting the analogy so tragically wrong.
um pahars Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 What's all the ******** about Judas though? If that was his story then he should've given the "30 pieces of silver" to Wilde, not Lowe. I think he would have, had Wilde turned up!!!!! Lowe didn't get coined, it was a piece of drama, a protest with some symbolism and the very fact that the OS is carrying a piece on it seems fckuking ridiculous. I was seriously thinking of lobbing my season ticket (OK my mates seasons ticket) on the running track on Saturday, would I be hauled out for lobbing missiles???
Ponty Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 He probably would have done if Wilde had bothered to attend the club's most important meeting of the year Perhaps Wilde got wind of the planned attack.
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Perhaps Wilde got wind of the planned attack. He could have used the money to help prop up his ailing building firm
Delmary Posted 23 December, 2008 Author Posted 23 December, 2008 why is it sad...im sure it will be reported the other way in the press...every story has two sides y'know what battle lines ffsRC is a nobody. Why publicise this non-event?
Ponty Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 He could have used the money to help prop up his ailing building firm I'm surprised Lowe didn't trouser the coinage to be honest
Thedelldays Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 RC is a nobody. Why publicise this non-event? to be fair...if i was sat there taking a shed load of abuse left right and centre and some moron threw something at me...knowing full well i would be portrayed in the local media as some sort of ****...then i would no doubt get a little boot in some way... ffs
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 I'm surprised Lowe didn't trouser the coinage to be honest I heard he was in the Chapel Arms this afternoon getting the beers in and paying with handfulls of 10p pieces :shock:
NickG Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 RC deserved banning for getting the analogy so tragically wrong. thought it was me being slow thinking it didn't quite work!
St Marco Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 We spoke about this earlier. WHat Rich should have done was buy some chocolate money and used that instead. I think a lot of people have overlooked the idea of the money representing the money Judas Iscariot was paid for betraying Jesus, his own reference to Michael Wilde's decision to support Lowe this year after originally ousting him. I thought it was very clever Agreed. Better then what any of us came up with which was nothing. Bet Lowe is reading this forum feeling really in his place...
NickG Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Lowe was more unpopular last time IMO, but only went (after a fight) when someone put their money where their mouth is and forced him out. Can only see him leaving in similar circumstances again.
Saint_clark Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Fine. But why does that deserve its own article when the key issues discussed at the meeting are ignored? There is a link in the article to the actual details of the meeting, isn't there?
um pahars Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 So the first climbdown has been made and this little snippet no longer has its own page on the OS. The next stop should be to remove it entirely. It's cringeable.
Saint_clark Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Still there, but because it's been edited it is under a different link.
Delmary Posted 23 December, 2008 Author Posted 23 December, 2008 http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11128 Full article removed but tagged onto http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/articles/article.php?page_id=11126 I wonder why? Sums up SFC. Who cares about RC. Lowe's playing his silly games again. What else happened at the AGM Rupert? If Lowe authorised this article then he really has lost the plot. FFS grow-up. Rupert stop trying to divert attention, the majority of Saints fans think RC is a t*sser just like you.Link updated.
SaintPaddy Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Throwing coins is regarded as a serious offence at football matches. Did I miss something, was there a match today?:confused:
Huffton Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Throwing coins is regarded as a serious offence at football matches. I wasn't there (unfortunately) but I'm guessing there is a difference in throwing coins and dropping a few into someones lap!
Ponty Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 I wasn't there (unfortunately) but I'm guessing there is a difference in throwing coins and dropping a few into someones lap! And I'd bet a pound to a pinch of sh*t that there's a difference between throwing coins, dropping a few into someones lap and what actually happened today. 3 sides to the story, remember.
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 And I'd bet a pound to a pinch of sh*t that there's a difference between throwing coins, dropping a few into someones lap and what actually happened today. 3 sides to the story, remember. THREE!! FFS there only ever used to be two. Lowe out!!!
Ponty Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 There's 3 now. Lowe's version, Chorley's version and the truth hidden somewhere between the two.
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 There's 3 now. Lowe's version, Chorley's version and the truth hidden somewhere between the two. It get's worse!! Lowe AND Chorley out!!! Oh, Chorley already is out
Chez Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Lowe has waited for years to totally discredit Chorley. Chorley has made it very easy for him today.
Window Cleaner Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Not if it hit someone and it went to court it wouldn't. I'm disappointed it happened. Richard was silly, should have bought at least a couple of shares so that Rupert couldn't deny the fact that he was a shareholder in his own right,with every right to attend the meeting. Smacks of amateurism if you ask me.A shareholders proxy you see, ie no individual right to be present, lowest of the low etc etc. Don't care about the rest, all's fair in love and war and all that, but get the basis of being there right at least.
benjii Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 There is a link in the article to the actual details of the meeting, isn't there? I don't know, but there wasn't when I looked at it. In fact, I see it has now been moved altogether. Nice emoticon though. Very gutting.
glkdcdes Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 i think we should be reporting Lowe to the police for crimes against sfc. ffs.
Fowllyd Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 Now I don't want to be argumentative, but I think that this http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11124 is a better comedy article. Just look at this classy quote: Striker David McGoldrick started the season well with a glut of goals against Cardiff and Derby and two against Exeter City in the Carling Cup, and has shouldered a lot of the goal-scoring responsibility up-front, but apart from himself and Andrew Surman, goals from other sources have been in short supply. A glut of goals? Now that's comedy!
Tamesaint Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 It was stupid of Chorley to throw real coins. Chocolate money or better still a shoe would have had better dramatic effect. It is even more stupid of Lowe to put this on OS. The beeb and other organisations who trawl websites looking for stories will pick up on it and it will make their news. It may even make the national news and then the world will learn that there is opposition to Rupert. By putting it on the website, Rupes is giving Chorley the publicity that he is looking for. Just shows what a t***er Rupes is.
Tamesaint Posted 23 December, 2008 Posted 23 December, 2008 now i don't want to be argumentative, but i think that this http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11124 is a better comedy article. Just look at this classy quote: A glut of goals? Now that's comedy! lol
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now