Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If we end up paying anywhere near £12m at any point, then our scouts need to be sacked.

 

Good player, decent addition - but not at that price, utter daylight robbery and a sickening waste of our 'fortune'.

Posted

Prices this season are mental.

 

7m for Ulloa

 

Leicester set to bid 10m for Deeney.

 

11m for McCormack

 

9m for 29 yr old Pelle

 

By those figures 10-12m is the going value.

 

Besides, you can never really tell on reported transfer values. Often the full amounts are never paid/received and its all paid in installments anyway.

Posted

There is just infinitely better value for money - that's the same price West Ham got quoted for Yarmolenko, who'd be an exciting signing. Long is a headless chicken and won't help at all in our 'where will the goals come from' conundrum...

Posted

What happened to all the talk a few weeks ago that if clubs want to buy players and the selling club doesn't want to sell then they have to pay over the odds? Does it only apply when we're the selling club?

Posted
What happened to all the talk a few weeks ago that if clubs want to buy players and the selling club doesn't want to sell then they have to pay over the odds? Does it only apply when we're the selling club?

 

No, it's that we've had a bid accepted apparently, surely there are better European options for that price? Hell, get in an exciting youngster, it's Shane Long ffs.

Posted
12m is the price we have to pay for seemingly wasting our summer trying to sign someone else who wasn't interested.

 

This cannot be true a terrible player not better than Billy Sharp. If we supposedly have agents crawling all over us with players what on earth are we doing signing this Championship class of player. An absolute disgrace no other word for it and that's if we paid £1m not 12!!!!!!!

Wtf is going on!!!!!!! Unbelievable

Posted
What happened to all the talk a few weeks ago that if clubs want to buy players and the selling club doesn't want to sell then they have to pay over the odds? Does it only apply when we're the selling club?

Of course not. It's understandable Hull want £12m for him.

 

It's not understandable that we want Shane Long at anywhere near that price.

Posted
No, it's that we've had a bid accepted apparently, surely there are better European options for that price? Hell, get in an exciting youngster, it's Shane Long ffs.

 

There were better options than Lallana for £25m, yet I didn't hear too many people complaining when we held out for it.

Posted
By comparison, £800k for Fraizer Campbell was a great bit of business.

 

What are you basing that on out of interest? Buying Fraizer Campbell is never good business at any price.

Posted

Makes zero sense at 12 million, especially as we have been so frugal in our other approaches reportedly. I highly doubt it is 12 and all I can hope is that it's something more realistic like 7. Even then it's a disappointing signing IMO.

Posted
Of course not. It's understandable Hull want £12m for him.

 

It's not understandable that we want Shane Long at anywhere near that price.

 

Maybe we do really want him and that's what we have to pay to get him because hull don't want to sell.

Posted
By comparison, £800k for Fraizer Campbell was a great bit of business.

 

Ah, yes, the prolific Fraizer Campbell (whose stock has rocketed on account of the fact that relegation dictated his sale fee).

Posted
There were better options than Lallana for £25m, yet I didn't hear too many people complaining when we held out for it.

 

True, on the plus side it will take our spending to 50 odd million, ambition guys! :lol:

Posted

Benteke £6m, Lukaku £15m (when he signed for Chelsea), Bony £12m.

 

They're out there, you just need a decent scouting setup to find them. We've just had a pants pulled down to be honest, want to be positive, I really do...but spending £12m on Shane Long stinks to high heaven of a club with utterly no idea or direction.

Posted
There were better options than Lallana for £25m, yet I didn't hear too many people complaining when we held out for it.

 

What's your point? Not interested in what other clubs pay for our players -if they overpay for them, all the better. Doesn't mean we have to. There isn't some unwritten code that you have to sell high and buy high.

Posted
Benteke £6m, Lukaku £15m (when he signed for Chelsea), Bony £12m.

 

They're out there, you just need a decent scouting setup to find them. We've just had a pants pulled down to be honest, want to be positive, I really do...but spending £12m on Shane Long stinks to high heaven of a club with utterly no idea or direction.

 

Benteke and Lukaku were two years ago or more.

 

Bony fair enough but after Osvaldo, Mayuka, Ramirez etc it is perhaps understandable that we are looking at someone with PL experience, especially seeing as we already got an unproven player in Pelle.

Posted
True, on the plus side it will take our spending to 50 odd million, ambition guys! :lol:

 

You 're having a laugh! Buying Shane Long shows ambition - I don't think so!!! 4 goals last year and truly dreadful!

Posted
What's your point? Not interested in what other clubs pay for our players -if they overpay for them, all the better. Doesn't mean we have to. There isn't some unwritten code that you have to sell high and buy high.

 

I thought it would be obvious pal. If we want a player and the selling club don't want to sell, then we pay a premium for it. Just like other clubs did with us.

Posted
Prices this season are mental.

 

7m for Ulloa

 

Leicester set to bid 10m for Deeney.

 

11m for McCormack

 

9m for 29 yr old Pelle

 

By those figures 10-12m is the going value.

 

Besides, you can never really tell on reported transfer values. Often the full amounts are never paid/received and its all paid in installments anyway.

 

Exactly. At least some of the old crusties will stop banging on about the cost of Gaston etc. These are the going rates for half decent players with time on their contracts.

Posted
Benteke £6m, Lukaku £15m (when he signed for Chelsea), Bony £12m.

 

They're out there, you just need a decent scouting setup to find them. We've just had a pants pulled down to be honest, want to be positive, I really do...but spending £12m on Shane Long stinks to high heaven of a club with utterly no idea or direction.

 

Bony's release fee is £18m apparently but no one has bought him yet as his wage demands are HUGE.

Posted
Benteke £6m, Lukaku £15m (when he signed for Chelsea), Bony £12m.

 

They're out there, you just need a decent scouting setup to find them. We've just had a pants pulled down to be honest, want to be positive, I really do...but spending £12m on Shane Long stinks to high heaven of a club with utterly no idea or direction.

 

After the TV money increase it's a different market.

 

My house was valued at 217k last year, same house is 270k this year.

Posted

Would be acceptable mediocre squad player on a free or 1 million.

Can't believe we are going to to give hull a profit on their crazy panic buy last January.

If true board are in desperate panic state trying to avoid relegation.

Certainly not actions of club with ambition, looking to bring in players with ability to develop such as we did when we signed the likes of Rodriguez.

Posted
Exactly. At least some of the old crusties will stop banging on about the cost of Gaston etc. These are the going rates for half decent players with time on their contracts.

 

Yes exactly but Shane Long does not fit into the 'half decent' bracket. This is a bad dream - laughable!!!!

Posted
Bloody Lunacy £!2M for him........moved from WBA to Hull for half that last season.....Nice one Les you really know how to do a deal :mcinnes:

 

That was a £7.5m deal according to the mirror today.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...