Tom28 Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Get rid of him we need men to get out this league not pansys like him. If we can get rid of Schneiderlin as well this could turn into a top summer. Good job Andy Portef wasn't in charge of player personnel decisions!!!
Heisenberg Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 **** him, we don't want people like that at our club. Screw him, he was utter clunge last year anyway. we should let him go for a reasonable fee Get £1m for him. some people never change
Dig Dig Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 some people never change too true mate. You can change the user name but not the **** behind it
Saint_clark Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 contracts these days for the top players are more to protect the club from the player walking on a free though aren't they? Liverpool stood firm last summer with Suarez, maybe we should try and do the same.
Olallana Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Maybe written earlier in this thread (dont have time to go through it) But as someone said on twitter. We let Puncheon go because he wanted to go home to Crystal Palace... We let Lambert go because he wanted to go home to Liverpool... Have fun in Bournemouth Adam....
shurlock Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Liverpool stood firm last summer with Suarez, maybe we should try and do the same. The most lazy analogy doing the rounds. Apples and pears. Liverpool made a quick start and ended up challenging for the title - do you think Suarez would have been so cooperative if the scousers had made a s**t or indifferent start?
Heisenberg Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 too true mate. You can change the user name but not the **** behind it I dont know much about the whole Dibden Purlieu Saint to Unbelievable Jeff saga, but will take your word for it.
Batman Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 (edited) The most lazy analogy doing the rounds. Apples and pears. Liverpool made a quick start and ended up challenging for the title - do you think Suarez would have been so cooperative if the scousers had made a s**t or indifferent start? They won 2 whole league games before the window shut against stoke and villa. Both 1-0 wins. yeah, amazing start Edited 3 June, 2014 by Batman
Smirking_Saint Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 I dont know much about the whole Dibden Purlieu Saint to Unbelievable Jeff saga, but will take your word for it. Thats actually quite funny gs
Heisenberg Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 They won 2 whole league games before the window shut against stoke and villa. Both 1-0 wins. yeah, amazing start
TUS Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 This thread has made excellent reading and has cheered me up. Makes you realise how far we have come! This one is my fav: He's ****e anyway and, like Surman, is a Champ player at best. If we can get over £1m for him I'd be delighted. Someone should give Mick McCarthy a ring as he seems determined to buy loads of lower league players.
Smirking_Saint Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 If he has refused to play as is reported then we should let him go for a reasonable fee, it's a shame that it has come to this, thought quite highly of the player, but if he wants to do a Kenwyne and **** on the club and the fans so be it. He will probably end up a good player with hard work and nurturing, if his heart is not in it however, ta ta Well edited though glasgow, besides, looking at those that posted it was a pretty common opinion at the time
Batman Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 to add to liverpools amazing start in their first 5 games, they won 3 (two of those were a mighty 1-0) drew 2-2 away to the amazing swansea and (oh my god) lost at home to poor old saints 1-0 lets not pretend they blew everyone out of the water and that was why suarez stayed
Heisenberg Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 (edited) to add to liverpools amazing start in their first 5 games, they won 3 (two of those were a mighty 1-0) drew 2-2 away to the amazing swansea and (oh my god) lost at home to poor old saints 1-0 lets not pretend they blew everyone out of the water and that was why suarez stayed 200k PW new contract in December helped out too. Edited 3 June, 2014 by Heisenberg
shurlock Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 They won 2 whole league games before the window shut against stoke and villa. Both 1-0 wins. yeah, amazing start What the f**k are you on about? The transfer window is neither here nor there If he felt hard done by, he could have been a divisive p***k at any point in the season, as history has shown. He didn't - he buckled down because Liverpool matched his ambition in what turned out to be a fantastic season.
Batman Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 What the f**k are you on about? The transfer window is neither here nor there If he felt hard done by, he could have been a divisive p***k at any point in the season, as history has shown. He didn't - he buckled down because Liverpool matched his ambition. yeah said suarez only stayed because liverpool had a great start there were two games in which he could have moved. they won them both 1-0. Mignolet had to save a last min penalty in one of them
shurlock Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Even when you're trying your hardest, you're wrong. Know your limits, Glasgow
verlaine1979 Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Suarez stayed because it was only Arsenal coming in for him. If a bigger club had tried to trigger that clause, the outcome probably would've been different. As it was, why get the lawyers involved just to finish fourth again? Liverpool keeping Suarez wasn't so much a show of strength from the Liverpool board, as a show of weakness in the market's interest in Suarez with all the controversy he'd attracted at that time.
Batman Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 ok. there is the january transfer window on dec 31st liverpool were 5th, having just lost to chelsea is that the amazing start?
buctootim Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 yeah said suarez only stayed because liverpool had a great start there were two games in which he could have moved. they won them both 1-0. Mignolet had to save a last min penalty in one of them Don't worry about it. When he's shown up he pretends he meant something different. Got the spine of a mollusc.
Batman Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 no, this must have been the amazing start on feb 2 (after the windown slammed shut) liverpool were 4th, 8 points from the top having just drawn away to WBA
shurlock Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 yeah said suarez only stayed because liverpool had a great start there were two games in which he could have moved. they won them both 1-0. Mignolet had to save a last min penalty in one of them You're missing the point and not responding to the post. Are you that thick? The point is that Suarez didn't need to throw a strop or feel aggrieved for not being allowed to go to the next level because Liverpool matched his ambition. Can we do the same with Lallana. No - hence they're totally different situations.
shurlock Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 no, this must have been the amazing start on feb 2 (after the windown slammed shut) liverpool were 4th, 8 points from the top having just drawn away to WBA The timing of the transfer window is neither here nor there.
hypochondriac Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Why is Glasgow allowed back on after being banned?
benjii Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 This thread has made excellent reading and has cheered me up. Makes you realise how far we have come! This one is my fav: In fairness, I was right about Surman. He is also much better now than he was then. There aren't too many players who improve as much as he did between 24-26. That said, he clearly wasn't ****e!
Batman Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 You're missing the point and not responding to the post. Are you that thick? The point is that Suarez didn't need to throw a strop or feel aggrieved for not being allowed to go to the next level because Liverpool matched his ambition. Can we do the same with Lallana. No - hence they're totally different situations. you SAID, suarez stayed because liverpool had agreat start. at no point during any of the windows did it look like they would win the league so yes, we can do the same with lallana
shurlock Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 (edited) you SAID, suarez stayed because liverpool had agreat start. at no point during any of the windows did it look like they would win the league so yes, we can do the same with lallana Read the whole post - they made a fast start and ended up challenging for the title, that is they had a fantastic season. Suarez didn't need to regret or bemoan his aborted move to Arsenal when he was having success with Liverpool. That is the point, you dimwit. Can we do something similar with Lallana - can we make him feel like Liverpool did with Suarez that he can grow and go places with us? That we can match his ambition? That is the key question. If the answer is no....then the analogy is a poor one. Get back behind the stove. Edited 3 June, 2014 by shurlock
Olallana Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Why is Glasgow allowed back on after being banned? It´s football, all about the money...(mods like their fivers)
Unbelievable Jeff Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 I dont know much about the whole Dibden Purlieu Saint to Unbelievable Jeff saga, but will take your word for it. Oh god, are you going to start following me around again are you? Didn't take you long did it?
Unbelievable Jeff Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Well edited though glasgow, besides, looking at those that posted it was a pretty common opinion at the time If a player refuses to play for us, then we should get rid, I think that's a reasonable opinion for you to have.
shurlock Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 you SAID, suarez stayed because liverpool had agreat start. at no point during any of the windows did it look like they would win the league so yes, we can do the same with lallana Suarez wanted to leave Liverpool to play CL football http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/23592181 Throughout the season -beginning, middle, end or whatever point you want to obsess about- they were legitimate contenders for a CL place. Lallana has expressed a similar wish - can we match it?
Batman Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Suarez wanted to leave Liverpool to play CL football http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/23592181 Throughout the season -beginning, middle, end or whatever point you want to obsess about- they were legitimate contenders for a CL place. Lallana has expressed a similar wish - can we match it? I think he wanted to play CL football the season just gone. Liverpool not only said no, but ignored the apparent clause in his contract yet, you said he stayed because of their storming start. which they never really had
Grey Crab Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 ok. there is the january transfer window on dec 31st liverpool were 5th, having just lost to chelsea is that the amazing start? Weren't they second about a week before that and then lost to City and Chelsea in the week over Christmas?
Cascadia Saint Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 And the winner is... have a bit of patience and you might see a great player devlop before your eyes. Some of you lot just will never learn. Young players need time and plenty of leeway. If he wants to leave then so be it, but until he has gone it might be an idea to just cut him and all the other developing youngsters a little more slack. If you can't spot his potential then quite frankly I doubt you never will be able to spot potential. agreed but many many players come good slightly later in their careers. poor shooting yes, but passing and heading he's more than capable. I'm clearly wasting my time, I rate him highly as do others on here but as with all players their will always be differing opinions. I agree. He is a long way from being ready for the Premiership and a long (and by that I mean playing lots of games) season with us in League 1 would not do him any harm at all. Commons' prospects and status were not harmed at all by his stint in League 1 and the same would apply to Lallana. It seems like a backwards step but in actual fact his development will prosper as Mills, Monk and many other young players have done when stepping down a DIV.
Batman Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Weren't they second about a week before that and then lost to City and Chelsea in the week over Christmas? nope. when they beat everton the week before (4-0) they went 4th
Gemmel Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Which reminds me.....what WAS the full story behind the NAMG 'scam' episode in 2007....? Now that was a story
Mallagroth Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 (edited) Suarez wanted to leave Liverpool to play CL football http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/23592181 Throughout the season -beginning, middle, end or whatever point you want to obsess about- they were legitimate contenders for a CL place. Lallana has expressed a similar wish - can we match it? Liverpool finished the 2012-2013 season in 7th and went up to 2nd this season. They were certainly not considered legitimate contenders for CL at start of season. Why is it guaranteed that they are going to do quite so well again… football media and fans in general have very short memories. Liverpool are the bestest team ever now, last June we were allegedly competing with them for similar level and priced players in the transfer market. They want all our players to push on. Think about that coz I ****ing wish Adam would. Edit: The season 2011-2012 Liverpool finished 8th with 52 pts. Just saying... Edited 3 June, 2014 by Mallagroth
shurlock Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 I think he wanted to play CL football the season just gone. Liverpool not only said no, but ignored the apparent clause in his contract yet, you said he stayed because of their storming start. which they never really had They were second after six - only Arsenal started quicker than them, you dullard. They were among the top four for most of the season, matching Suarez's ambitions for CL football. Even better, they nearly won the league. Can we do the same for AL like Liverpool for Suarez - and so remove the source of his grievance and desire to move elsewhere? Take your time, you're floundering
Batman Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 They were second after six - only Arsenal started quicker than them, you dullard. They were among the top four for most of the season, matching Suarez's ambitions for CL football. Even better, they nearly won the league. Can we do the same for AL like Liverpool for Suarez - and so remove the source of his grievance and desire to move elsewhere? Take your time, you're floundering ok mate.
shurlock Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Liverpool finished the season in 7th and went up to 2nd this season. They were certainly not considered legitimate contenders for CL at start of season. Why is it guaranteed that they are going to do quite so well again… football media and fans in general have very short memories. Liverpool are the bestest team ever now, last June we were allegedly competing with them for similar level and priced players in the transfer market. They want all our players to push on. Think about that coz I ****ing wish Adam would. No they weren't legitimate contenders at the start of the season - that's one reason why Suarez wanted to move. Did I say otherwise? But they soon became contenders -and therefore made it far easier for Suarez to get back onboard than feel resentful that the club was standing in the way of his progress.
Baird of the land Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 I personally think that if Adam and or Luke want to leave and the club are getting north of £60m for them plus Lambert and Osvaldo then fine. As long as the club bring in a good manager and significantly strengthen we can come out of this stronger than last year. I think maybe the time is right as long as the fees are right to revamp the side. Disagree, think we should only let one of the two leave this summer.
jimmysaint7 Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Picture of lallana on twitter signing a young lads liverpool shirt.apparently when the lad asked lallana if he was joining liverpool he replied i hope so
Saint Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Picture of lallana on twitter signing a young lads liverpool shirt.apparently when the lad asked lallana if he was joining liverpool he replied i hope so Jesus Christ. Wind ya neck in
jimmysaint7 Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Jesus Christ. Wind ya neck in Care to elaborate numpty?
Saint Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 Care to elaborate numpty? I've seen that picture but there's no evidence that he said that. Just going from some moron's tweet. This is how stupid rumours get started. Your punctuation is also appalling.
jimmysaint7 Posted 3 June, 2014 Posted 3 June, 2014 I've seen that picture but there's no evidence that he said that. Just going from some moron's tweet. This is how stupid rumours get started. Your punctuation is also appalling. Good job i am not a teacher then.i read his tweets and that is what it said.but your right as u say its clearly a rumour and he obviously has no interest in leaving.
Recommended Posts