Jump to content

Adam Lallana - Medical at Liverpool


Dr Who?

Recommended Posts

If he decides to go I will be sad, but will wish him all the best. Being at the top in football is a short-term, fleeting thing; he should chase whatever his dream is.

 

MLT was one of the best players this nation ever produced, and will always be a massive hero for us because he stuck by us, but it isnt paying his bills now, and he never got a fair crack at honours or England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he decides to go I will be sad, but will wish him all the best. Being at the top in football is a short-term, fleeting thing; he should chase whatever his dream is.

 

MLT was one of the best players this nation ever produced, and will always be a massive hero for us because he stuck by us, but it isnt paying his bills now, and he never got a fair crack at honours or England.

 

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few people have mentioned it's down to whether Liverpool can meet Saints' valuation of Lallana. Others have said we need to see what the new TV deal does to transfer fees before deciding anything.

 

A somewhat basic look at the TV deal shows that we'd need way more that Liverpool are offering to compensate the loss of Lallana. Finishing 8th earned us £7.5 million more than finishing 14th (our previous season's finish) would have done. Even finishing three places lower would have been worth nearly £4 million less to us. It's not unreasonable to think we'd have finished 11th rather than 8th without Lallana.

 

In simplistic terms say we sell Lallana and finish 11th for the next four seasons (the remainder of Lallana's current contract) rather than 8th. That would cost us £14,832,996 in TV prize money alone (without considering any future increases in the TV money). If Lallana stayed and helped us gain three places in the league each season, it'd be just as beneficial to us financially if we let him run down his current contract to leave for free than selling him for £20,000,000 (with Bournemouth's sell on clause) .

 

Even worse, say we sell Lallana and others and just about survive against relegation each year. Finishing just outside the relegation zone each year would leave us £11 million worse off per season compared to finishing eighth. That soon adds up.

 

By my maths we shouldn't currently sell Lallana for anything less than £60 million. Match that Liverpool!

 

I'm sure each team has some pretty clever accountants, but teams that manage to understand the TV figures the quickest could make a killing in the transfer market! It's the perfect time to be buying players, not selling. It would definitely make sense to hold onto the crown jewels for at least another year before selling, especially given the length of their contracts. Transfers fees could suddenly double or triple and all of a sudden we'll find ourselves having to bid £80,000,000 to buy Danny Rose as a replacement for £30,000,000 Luke Shaw.

 

TV money figures: https://twitter.com/premierleague/status/466572990562725890/photo/1

That's the first time I've looked at it like that. It's a contrarian view but actually I think it's entirely valid and got a fairly good chance of being how it will be. Adam is not worth £25m to Liverpool but he IS worth £50m + to us. We should look at it like that and do whatever is necessary to keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A comment from Lallana yesterday i feel was quite telling:

 

"Lallana, who was speaking on behalf of Vauxhall the England Team Sponsor, said: "Whether my future gets sorted before or after the World Cup makes no difference to me.

 

"I am just fully focused on doing well for England and performing as well as I can."

 

He has 4 years left on his contract, why would he worry about his future being sorted before or after the world cup ? The only reason i can see is he is thinking about moving.

Apart from Lovern, not one player has said "'I'm happy at saints, i'm not moving".

What with Poch, must admit i'm getting pretty disillusioned by it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to that comment, this all but confirms:

 

Lallana's most likely destination looks to be Liverpool and the 26-year-old said he was eager to test himself in the UEFA Champions League.

 

"I'm ambitious. I have aspirations to play in the Champions League," he said.

 

"Ever since I've played international football, you realise there's that other level to play at. It would be great.

 

"I went to a couple of the Champions League games last year and the feeling you get, the buzz, it's an unbelievable atmosphere. It's definitely a goal of mine to play in the Champions League."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because a player wants to go doesn't mean he definitely will. Valuation for a start. Plenty of players' dream moves have been scuppered. Adam wouldn't even be a sulker like imagine Suarez would have been after last summer and that turned out ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ever reliable football direct news claims Lallana is undergoing a medical on Thursday.

 

If he is going, I wish our board will grow some balls and not roll over immediately. One small parcel of mercy would be to see Shaw & Lallana compete in the world cup as Saints players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is going, I wish our board will grow some balls and not roll over immediately. One small parcel of mercy would be to see Shaw & Lallana compete in the world cup as Saints players.

 

 

they will anyway because of the window for the officialisation of transfers. We'll get all the FIFA hand out money for them as well. With 6 players we'll get a relatively tidy sum, exactly how much depends on how far each side go in the competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely if they had rolled over immediately both Lallana and Shaw would already be gone?

 

 

just now we're asking for more than clubs are willing to pay, not really rolling over, may change when they all start handing in their written requests. By all account Van Gaal has torn up Utd's transfer list and is insisting on a shedload of Dutch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously those comments could've been taken out of context, but he sounds pretty much gone to me.

 

Next up out the door: Shaw, then Schneiderlin I'd imagine, hopefully there won't be anymore after that.

 

If it was just those three and we brought in say 70m then is that really bad business?

 

We could get a decent LB (or play Clyne there), a top notch or young AM (Shaqiri, Will Hughes), a striker and a CB. Pick up a decent CM as back up. It needn't be the end of the world.

 

Plus of course whoever we bring as manager (Yakin for example) may be very aware of his own list of players. Raiding Basel wouldn't be all bad, they have some terrific players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was just those three and we brought in say 70m then is that really bad business?

 

We could get a decent LB (or play Clyne there), a top notch or young AM (Shaqiri, Will Hughes), a striker and a CB. Pick up a decent CM as back up. It needn't be the end of the world.

 

Plus of course whoever we bring as manager (Yakin for example) may be very aware of his own list of players. Raiding Basel wouldn't be all bad, they have some terrific players

 

Or we could sign another batch of flops like Osvaldo, Ramirez, Mayuka and Forren....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can categorically confirm that lallana is leaving. I know someone who is a friend of lallanas dad who has confirmed that he is going to Liverpool and the deal already agreed

 

 

can't be right though can it, we haven't consulted the new manager about it yet, he might put his veto on it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can categorically confirm that lallana is leaving. I know someone who is a friend of lallanas dad who has confirmed that he is going to Liverpool and the deal already agreed

 

Cheers for the info - any idea why it hasn't been announced?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info. :(

 

I have a friend ,who is a friend of a person who owns a dog, that chased the cat of a person that once owned a hamster bought from a shop near where Adam lives. Anyway he knows nothing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers for the info - any idea why it hasn't been announced?

 

 

cos Ralphy says it hasn't happened that's why, get caught with your trousers down once...well it's only good old Rickie, who'd deny him a last fling at his boyhood club...we're the good guys remember.Get caught veiling the truth over Lallana a few hours later...well people have been hung,drawn and quartered for less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a friend ,who is a friend of a person who ownperson who told me this is my boss dog, that chased the cat of a person that once owned a hamster bought from a shop near where Adam lives. Anyway he knows nothing!

 

I knew someone would post something like that. I would think the same. The person who told me this is my boss and he is not a bullsh** er

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cos Ralphy says it hasn't happened that's why, get caught with your trousers down once...well it's only good old Rickie, who'd deny him a last fling at his boyhood club...we're the good guys remember.Get caught veiling the truth over Lallana a few hours later...well people have been hung,drawn and quartered for less.

 

Well if it's a fait accompli simply to be rubber stamped by the new manager to maintain the pretence of authority, I'll be mightily f**ked off. Prefer to give them the benefit of the doubt for the time being - incompetent probably yes, cynical no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh god I hope not. I really hope not. And without a new manager to make an assessment. Whats more he's not even had a chance to add £3-4m by scoring in the WC. These clowns are going to be made to look foolish again by Liverpool. THERE IS NO RUSH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony Barrett ‏@TonyBarretTimes 7m

Liverpool's bid for Lallana has been increased to £25m. They now want the deal done quickly or will move on to other targets.

 

Oh look, Liverpool wheeling out the method they used to bully the club into selling Lambert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh look, Liverpool wheeling out the method they used to bully the club into selling Lambert.

 

Exactly but will Saints Board have learned from their foolishness. WE DONT NEED TO SELL AND MUST NOT UNTIL OUR NEW MANAGER HAS MADE HIS ASSESSMENT.

 

Let them move on to other targets! Please!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That offer is fair value.

 

Hi Ralph.

 

Don't know how many times I have to say this, an offer is only fair value if you can reasonably expect to replace what you have lost with the money gained. We won't be able to, particularly as I have serious reservations whether the board will re-invest even close to the whole amount gained. There's a handful of players as good as Lallana in his role, and guess what, none of them are going to want to come here in the midst of us selling all our best talent. We'll have to gamble on an up and comer, and probably pay over the odds in wages to pursuade them to come (sound familiar?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except we couldn't guarantee replacing him for that money.

 

We might - we might not. We might even come out on top.

 

Just saying for a player who's intent on leaving, that's closer to his fair value, even with the fee to Bournemouth. Unlike Lambert of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know he is going.

 

But 25m not enough considering the Bmth clause which leaves us with under 20m, a crazy figure for our Captain, on long contract and off the back of being voted by fellow pros onto the POTY shortlist.

 

Lets at least stand up for ourselves on this one and not be bullied again by Liverpool.

Edited by Saint Charlie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ralph.

 

Don't know how many times I have to say this, an offer is only fair value if you can reasonably expect to replace what you have lost with the money gained. We won't be able to, particularly as I have serious reservations whether the board will re-invest even close to the whole amount gained. There's a handful of players as good as Lallana in his role, and guess what, none of them are going to want to come here in the midst of us selling all our best talent. We'll have to gamble on an up and comer, and probably pay over the odds in wages to pursuade them to come (sound familiar?).

 

Obviously I want to hold out for as much as possible but we stand a much better chance of replacing him than we do Lambert. The reality is that the lad is intent on leaving -that resolve will have only been stiffened by this week's events which I'm critical of. At one point pragmatism has to enter the picture.

 

If we had to settle for £25m minus the fee to Bournemouth, I wouldn't see as a one-sided i.e. unfair deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously I want to hold out for as much as possible but we stand a much better chance of replacing him than we do Lambert. The reality is that the lad is intent on leaving -that resolve will have only been stiffened by this week's events. So at one point pragmatism has to enter the picture.

 

If we had to settle for £25m minus the fee to Bournemouth, I wouldn't see as a one-sided i.e. unfair deal.

 

Sorry completely disagree. 30m should be our red line in the sand at bare minimum. Also don't think we can afford to let the exits become a stampede so we have to be tough in regards who we allow to go and ignore the players feelings. 2 seasons ago Swansea did great. They sold Allen but they didn't sell michu, William's, Taylor, vorm etcetera who were all coveted by other clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry completely disagree. 30m should be our red line in the sand at bare minimum. Also don't think we can afford to let the exits become a stampede so we have to be tough in regards who we allow to go and ignore the players feelings. 2 seasons ago Swansea did great. They sold Allen but they didn't sell michu, William's, Taylor, vorm etcetera who were all coveted by other clubs.

 

Look I want to hold out for as much as possible but our hand is significantly weaker than it was a week ago. If Poch was still around and there were reasons to think Lallana might want to stay, we would have much more leverage. But that's gone and we have a player whose head is increasingly elsewhere. Any final deal has to be evaluated against these constraints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate this nonsense about not wanting to keep an unhappy player. Suarez wanted to go to arsenal last summer but Liverpool wouldn't let him and he didn't sulk on the pitch. If the deal doesn't match what saints want or if saints don't feel selling is in their interests now they are perfectly in their rights to fig their heels in and say come back next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...