Jump to content

Pochettino's Future


Saint Charlie

Recommended Posts

Im sure Krugar said that next season starts now or words to that effect after the utd game. So surely that includes the manager getting tied down, it is 2 weeks since the season finished and still the manager isnt sorted.

 

Imo he is off on that basis as MP has already said that he will talk at the end of the season and im sure the contract would of already been drawn up for then

 

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other thread had decended into an argument about whether Saints could reach top 4, 5, 6, and then into an argument about people's general outlook on Saints, and it was starting to get heated.

 

It was useless for anyone actually wanting to talk about Pochettino.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other thread had decended into an argument about whether Saints could reach top 4, 5, 6, and then into an argument about people's general outlook on Saints, and it was starting to get heated.

 

It was useless for anyone actually wanting to talk about Pochettino.

 

 

Don't worry Jimmy - You really don't look like a prize d!ck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever... if MP prefers Tottenham then hope it happens this week; I think there will be a long queue for the job here.

 

I like this post.

 

If MP is not committed then he might as well F-off rather that than he dumps us mid season. I reckon you're right we must be a pretty attractive job for a lot of managers at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever... if MP prefers Tottenham then hope it happens this week; I think there will be a long queue for the job here.

 

I think there would and that is why this story http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/476362/EXCLUSIVE-Break-the-bank-Southampton-s-6m-to-keep-Pochettino wasn't, to me, just aimed at MP. It was also for other top managers out there knowing that they would be well paid - that is if there is any truth in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul Jewell, Phil Brown, Peter Reid, Gerry Francis etc..

Big Racist Ron has been out of work for too long.

 

So has Peter Shreeves. The only football man I've heard say "do you know who I am?". (I didn't, as it goes, but luckily he wasn't talking to me).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just fck off Spurs. Appoint someone cheap so when you sack then in January it doesn't cost too much.

 

Are you suggesting that Tottenham change the manager alot?

 

Over the past 10 years we have had 14 different managers, Spurs just 7?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you suggesting that Tottenham change the manager alot?

 

Over the past 10 years we have had 14 different managers, Spurs just 7?

 

You counting Wigley x2, Bessant/Wise, Gorman and Wilkins in there, aren't you? They were temporary appointments (well one of Wigley's was).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You counting Wigley x2, Bessant/Wise, Gorman and Wilkins in there, aren't you? They were temporary appointments (well one of Wigley's was).

 

True i am, i used wikipedia ill be honest and simply counted the managers, didnt focus much on lenghs of role.

Just thought it was an interesting comparasion given the idea that Spurs were quite trigger happy with managers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

]Other thread had decended into an argument [/b]about whether Saints could reach top 4, 5, 6, and then into an argument about people's general outlook on Saints, and it was starting to get heated.

 

It was useless for anyone actually wanting to talk about Pochettino.

So you closed the thread for a reason that applies to 99% of the other threads on this forum? your'e a strange one nipper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

True i am, i used wikipedia ill be honest and simply counted the managers, didnt focus much on lenghs of role.

Just thought it was an interesting comparasion given the idea that Spurs were quite trigger happy with managers

 

Wasn't saggy chops spurs manager for like 4 years? probably still would be if he hadn't pimped himself out in the press for the England job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True i am, i used wikipedia ill be honest and simply counted the managers, didnt focus much on lenghs of role.

Just thought it was an interesting comparasion given the idea that Spurs were quite trigger happy with managers

 

OK, we all know Adkins and Pardew got the bullet. The latter apparently for well known reasons. Wotte got replaced by the new owner. Poortvliet resigned. Pearson got the chop - was it cost cutting? Burley resigned to take over at Scotland. Saggy resigned. Wigley got the chop (silly appointment). Sturrock left by mutual consent (ie was fired). Strachan resigned. So we don't really have itchy trigger fingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, we all know Adkins and Pardew got the bullet. The latter apparently for well known reasons. Wotte got replaced by the new owner. Poortvliet resigned. Pearson got the chop - was it cost cutting? Burley resigned to take over at Scotland. Saggy resigned. Wigley got the chop (silly appointment). Sturrock left by mutual consent (ie was fired). Strachan resigned. So we don't really have itchy trigger fingers.

You say that, but is this a fair way to look at it?

 

Adkins: Sacked.

Pardew: Sacked.

Wotte: Sacked after relegating the side.

Poortvliet: Sacked after a dreadful run of results left the side perished.

Pearson: Arguably unfairly sacked perhaps, but spent a lot of money on loans just to survive on the last day.

Burley: Resigned and seemingly lost interest.

Redknapp: Resigned after getting us relegated and not showing much interest.

Wigley: Awful appointment from start to finish, didn't get sacked soon enough.

Sturrock: Sacked in weird circumstances, players revolt?

Strachan: Resigned, fair enough.

 

Cortese clearly has itchy trigger fingers, but was justified by bringing in someone better each time. The previous regime? Less so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, we all know Adkins and Pardew got the bullet. The latter apparently for well known reasons. Wotte got replaced by the new owner. Poortvliet resigned. Pearson got the chop - was it cost cutting? Burley resigned to take over at Scotland. Saggy resigned. Wigley got the chop (silly appointment). Sturrock left by mutual consent (ie was fired). Strachan resigned. So we don't really have itchy trigger fingers.

 

This is a thread to discuss Pochettinos future, one reason given for him to stay is the expected longevity of any spurs role. Just felt it was fair to highlight that Spurs dont appear to be as triggerhappy as some would like to suggest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say that, but is this a fair way to look at it?

 

Adkins: Sacked.

Pardew: Sacked.

Wotte: Sacked after relegating the side.

Poortvliet: Sacked after a dreadful run of results left the side perished.

Pearson: Arguably unfairly sacked perhaps, but spent a lot of money on loans just to survive on the last day.

Burley: Resigned and seemingly lost interest.

Redknapp: Resigned after getting us relegated and not showing much interest.

Wigley: Awful appointment from start to finish, didn't get sacked soon enough.

Sturrock: Sacked in weird circumstances, players revolt?

Strachan: Resigned, fair enough.

 

Cortese clearly has itchy trigger fingers, but was justified by bringing in someone better each time. The previous regime? Less so.

 

Pearson wasn't sacked was he? His contract just wasn't renewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And? SFC haven't been in the premier league all those years, it's hard to get stability when you're going up and down the leagues, in and out of administration. My point had nothing to do with Saints, merely that Spurs is a place where managers with promising careers or half decent reputations fail, or don't get enough time.

 

It's also irrelevant to judge anything but the present. Our present board have never sacked anyone. Their current board is Levy, who has been through a lot of managers.

Think you're doing the Heisenberg name a disservice.

Is the Spurs record any worse than the average Premier league side? Arsenal have Wenger, of course, but after that it's a ridiculous state of affairs for all PL sides. Everton with Moyes are an exception, Chelsea have gone mental with managers, Liverpool have not been brilliant either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And? SFC haven't been in the premier league all those years, it's hard to get stability when you're going up and down the leagues, in and out of administration. My point had nothing to do with Saints, merely that Spurs is a place where managers with promising careers or half decent reputations fail, or don't get enough time.

 

It's also irrelevant to judge anything but the present. Our present board have never sacked anyone. Their current board is Levy, who has been through a lot of managers.

 

Think you're doing the Heisenberg name a disservice.

 

12 premiership management changes this season alone, no job in the prem is secure. Its simply not a secure industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people really think Pochettino would just casually turn up to Spurs' training ground for talks?

 

Even if he did want to be a naughty boy, I'd trust both he, his advisors, and Spurs would find a far more discreet way to talk - and most definitely not somewhere like Spurs' training ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, why does it matter? This isn't about any other premier league side, it's about Spurs and Levy. I think any manager in a secure job would think twice, but if it's a CL club they'd obviously take the risk. For Man Utd they would. But Spurs? It's all the risk with little of the reward. I'm sure he'll go for it anyway, but I don't expect it to end well for him. Such delusions of grandeur there most seem to doubt he's the main, all wanting a top name like Ancelotti. It's Spurs FFS.

It matters because you have to look at it in context.

 

Do we as fans agree with it? Perhaps not. But if you're going to single out one club for having a hire and fire culture, it's probably best to equate that to the clubs around them.

 

I think you seem to have an engendered dislike of Spurs and quite enjoy a dig in the sides without actually admitting they're not the only ones acting like that. If you think that various other clubs act the same, I'd agree totally, it is a ridiculous state of affairs. But I'm not sure if you are saying that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people really think Pochettino would just casually turn up to Spurs' training ground for talks?

 

Even if he did want to be a naughty boy, I'd trust both he, his advisors, and Spurs would find a far more discreet way to talk - and most definitely not somewhere like Spurs' training ground.

 

It does seem pretty improbable yes. Look at the lengths Levy and Hoddle went to to cover up their having talks when he did his Judas act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who gets ****ed of with posts that contain the words " it is clear that" or " it is obvious that" when we actually know nothing? We can all speculate/debate but in all honesty we can only guess at what is really going on.

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...