Jump to content

Internet forums = serious business?


pap
 Share

Recommended Posts

The claim that internet forums are serious business is one that is frequently made here, albeit mostly in jest, and mostly aimed at wordy bastards like me that take a dictionary to the crapper.

 

Leaving aside the fun and games aspect, are internet forums really serious business? If one looks at the substance of cryptome's "Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies" with any degree of credibility, looks like it just might be.

 

http://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

 

Would like some opinions, of course. However, I invite anyone who wants to be less than serious to play disinfo bingo instead ( ascribe the listed traits in the link to TSW posters for fun, etc ).

 

Internet forums. Serious business?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i got Told Off yesterday for ruining a thread about stock levels of saints branded babygrows. I spose I was being Topic Dilution :(

 

Stopping humanity from having a discussion to promote the interests of bear-kind, eh? You bastard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah i spose, we may never find out why there is insufficient babygrows to fulfil market demands and it's All My Fault.

 

I am v.quick to apologise when someone is angar bout my trolling tho, and i generally leave them alone after that! I mean, secretly I think they're a bit precious but i don't ever say nothing bout it. I like to think I'm Mostly Harmless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry bear. I'm now very disappointed. I was in love with the idea that you might be a furry 007. I know find that much like myself, you're doing this for lols and personal satisfaction. I presume there is no Bear Intelligence 6?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have license to kill threads :twisted:

 

Yes, well this one is just getting going.

 

I feel you need to put the cat amongst the pigeons and name a potential spy ( e.g. Sarb is here on behalf of Evil Landlords Association, etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have license to kill threads :twisted:

 

how dare you ruin a serious thread concerning my unborn twins. if you're going to post in the saintsweb main board, please confine yourself to:

1 wishing me luck

2 mentioning how quickly my precious unborn twins will grow up

3 welcoming southampton's newest (and most precious) fans into this cruel, miserable world.

 

rant over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how dare you ruin a serious thread concerning my unborn twins. if you're going to post in the saintsweb main board, please confine yourself to:

1 wishing me luck

2 mentioning how quickly my precious unborn twins will grow up

3 welcoming southampton's newest (and most precious) fans into this cruel, miserable world.

 

rant over

 

Topic Dilution, right there.

 

Stooge :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tokyos isn't a real saints fan. Tokyos favourite team is Man City. He heard about Man City when he was a kid struggling with his sexuality and he thought omg i would love to live in Man City, it sounds awesome!

 

pap pls can you confirm which type of troll i'm doing here pls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tokyos isn't a real saints fan. Tokyos favourite team is Man City. He heard about Man City when he was a kid struggling with his sexuality and he thought omg i would love to live in Man City, it sounds awesome!

 

pap pls can you confirm which type of troll i'm doing here pls

 

I think we've been missing this one since ol' Verbal got de-fanged.

 

Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

 

Can you oblige?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is about spies, bTripz. Your video is amusing, but is it relevant?

 

Sorry, just saw Fred's name and didn't read any of it....let me do that just now

 

--

 

Ah sorry, consider it a diversionary tactic whilst I subvert Toke's sexuality and groom him for acceptance into the Citeh school of Religion

 

Anyway what's it got to do with you you undercover beatnik, wannabe Scouse ****..

Edited by Big Bad Bob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah sorry, consider it a diversionary tactic whilst I subvert Toke's sexuality and groom him for acceptance into the Citeh school of Religion

 

Anyway what's it got to do with you you undercover beatnik, wannabe Scouse ****..

 

This thread is really a primer for future replies, bTripz.

 

In my many ding-dongs with people on this site, I've observed quite a few of these tactics being employed. Sometimes, I even bother pointing it out.

 

Now, I'm not necessarily saying these people are forum spies, but if they're not, they should probably consider taking it up as an option. Why not get paid for something you're doing anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glasgow

 

you need counselling as you have been scarred for life

 

I get accussed of taking the forum too serious, I am trying to be more light hearted

 

Is this an invocation of mighty number 17, Viking Warrior?

 

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

 

I'm going to play along.

 

Yes, the topic should be about Glasgow. Too few threads feature a discussion of his qualities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A fan of number 13, Glasgow?

 

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I invite anyone who wants to be less than serious to play disinfo bingo instead ( ascribe the listed traits in the link to TSW posters for fun, etc ).

 

Would be quicker to list the traits that don't apply to certain posters on TSW....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be quicker to list the traits that don't apply to certain posters on TSW....

 

Almost certainly, but then none of us are here because we're time poor :)

 

Besides, I have a highly transparent agenda to prosecute here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah i spose, we may never find out why there is insufficient babygrows to fulfil market demands and it's All My Fault.

 

I am v.quick to apologise when someone is angar bout my trolling tho, and i generally leave them alone after that! I mean, secretly I think they're a bit precious but i don't ever say nothing bout it. I like to think I'm Mostly Harmless.

Respect. I for one admire people who don't stoop so low that they post their private opinions about other people on public internet forums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respect. I for one admire people who don't stoop so low that they post their private opinions about other people on public internet forums.

 

You've picked the wrong example there, bro.

 

Bearsy called me díck once. He's not wrong, like - but there it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respect. I for one admire people who don't stoop so low that they post their private opinions about other people on public internet forums.

 

i would never publicly criticise someone. People who do that, like e.g. Tokyo-Saint are f*cking w*nkers - what a prat he is yo! Ugly too, v.ugly he makes me sick + I mostly only look at him from behind. I pity the fool that is have to look at his dumb face. C*nt.

Edited by Bearsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would never publicly criticise someone. People who do that, like e.g. Tokyo-Saint are f*cking w*nkers - what a prat he is yo! Ugly too, v.ugly he makes me sick + I mostly only look at him from behind. I pity the fool that is have to look at his dumb face. C*nt.

 

Is that when your, ahemm, walking your "dogs" together?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh sorry mods. Thought this thread was in the muppet show. It should be really. You should be moding it better to make sure stuff like this is in the correct forums. Maybe you should be apologising to us for that. Anyway, sorry. I very rarely post dog like gimp photos in the lounge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A-ha! Do I spot number 18?

 

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh sorry mods. Thought this thread was in the muppet show. It should be really. You should be moding it better to make sure stuff like this is in the correct forums. Maybe you should be apologising to us for that. Anyway, sorry. I very rarely post dog like gimp photos in the lounge.

 

To be fair Tokes, the thread is trying to determine whether the Internet is serious business.

 

Blame Bearsy for early muppetisation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That seems to be the stock response round here lately + I'm sick of it! How is you dare!

 

(this is rule #2 i think)

 

Indeed. People have thrown #2 my way several times. It's shít.

 

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.

 

I'm not sure on reputation points protocol away from home, Bear - but if it were down to me, this fine on-topic contribution would net you some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting read, written really badly and with bad grammar. (Topic dilution). What it says is THE MAN wants us all to be like the elite classes in Hunger Games, endlessly discussing completely vacuous subjects, or esle slaves. That's what the stooge mods are working towards on every forum, everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting read, written really badly and with bad grammar. (Topic dilution). What it says is THE MAN wants us all to be like the elite classes in Hunger Games, endlessly discussing completely vacuous subjects, or esle slaves. That's what the stooge mods are working towards on every forum, everywhere.

 

If I'm being perfectly honest, half the reason I started this thread was to have a snipe at some of my semi-regular correspondents. In doing that, and especially in playing with the Bear, I've probably done the topic something of a disservice.

 

If Snowden is to be believed, the Internet is serious business. Turkey suspended Twitter for weeks recently after some tweets linked a leaked transcript of Turkish commanders ostensibly planning a false flag attack in Syria. The US government also recently setup a Cuban variant of Twitter for disinformation and propaganda purposes.

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/07/us-cuba-usa-idUSBREA350MO20140407

 

In terms of bang for your buck, opinion formers on the Internet are worryingly cost-effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...