Jump to content

SWF Definitive ITK Ranking 2014


Saint Charlie
 Share

Recommended Posts

As this week has already seen countless rumours, and the summer window draws closer, it is time to re-evaluate who is an ITK amongst the SWF population.

 

As we know, there are numerous ratings of newspaper stories looking at the proportion of transfer stories which actually come to fruition – allowing readers to decide which publications they would prefer to believe.

 

Now the time has come for the ITKs of SWF to stand up and be counted.

 

From today – I will be monitoring the “snippets” which are posted on the Forum and providing official ITK percentage scores to each poster, in the hope of finding the true ITK by the end of the transfer window, September 2014.

 

I did a similar exercise privately during the January window to test the feasibility of running the search for the true ITK, and can now announce the results. These are based on the percentage of ITK statements which turned out to be true by the close of the window.

 

January ITK Ranking

 

mehball - 100%

 

K-Billy – 80%

 

Guan – 80%

 

Monk – 75%

 

Sanjay Sanchez – 40%

 

Fitzhugh Fella – 12%

 

View From The Top – 0%

 

Matthew Le Tissier – 0%

 

Glasgow Saint – 0%

 

MLG – 0%

 

All current scores have been reset, so there is an opportunity for some of the 0% ers to recover, and also for others to join in.

 

What qualifies as ITK?

 

An ITK comment must be made prior to it appearing on any published source and must have a degree of certainty in what you say. You do not have to name your source when questioned by other posters.

 

What do I have to do?

 

If you are a “lesser known” poster (below 500 posts) who wishes to challenge for the ITK crown then please make yourself known on this thread so I can track your posts. Otherwise just keep proving to everyone how ITK you are and watchout for the bi-weekly rankings to be published via this thread.

 

Best of luck to all.

Edited by Saint Charlie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLG – 0%

 

I've only ever claimed to be "ITK" twice, and I was right on both occasions when I said Jack Stephens and Sam Gallagher would be signing from Plymouth long before they actually did or it making any newspaper.

 

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?34280-Sam-Gallagher-Plymouth-Argyle-youth-player-to-sign-for-Saints&highlight=Gallagher#.Uyxi2tx8bR4

 

So my ITK success rate is 100%.

Edited by Matthew Le God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only ever claimed to be "ITK" twice, and I was right on both occasions when I said Jack Stephens and Sam Gallagher would be signing from Plymouth long before they actually did or it making any newspaper.

 

True - certainly with Gallagher I remember.

 

I included you in the January one for ITK comments alluding to the development of St Mary's which hadn't been confirmed by the end of the month. However, I will recheck my data and if they weren't made within January then I will remove you from the list.

 

Good luck going forward though, hopefully we sign a couple more from Plymouth that you find out about!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VMan and Monk are about the only ITKs on this forum these days other than Fitzhugh. VMan not even mentioned.

 

Incorrect. mehball, Billy and Guan had top records in Jan. Plus also last summer.

 

VMAN is obviously a contender but didnt show it in January re transfers - not that there was much speculation to comment on. He will clearly be a contender over the summer.

 

Fitzhugh with work to do IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only ever claimed to be "ITK" twice, and I was right on both occasions when I said Jack Stephens and Sam Gallagher would be signing from Plymouth long before they actually did or it making any newspaper.

 

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?34280-Sam-Gallagher-Plymouth-Argyle-youth-player-to-sign-for-Saints&highlight=Gallagher#.Uyxi2tx8bR4

 

So my ITK success rate is 100%.

 

Computer says no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only ever claimed to be "ITK" twice, and I was right on both occasions when I said Jack Stephens and Sam Gallagher would be signing from Plymouth long before they actually did or it making any newspaper.

 

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?34280-Sam-Gallagher-Plymouth-Argyle-youth-player-to-sign-for-Saints&highlight=Gallagher#.Uyxi2tx8bR4

 

So my ITK success rate is 100%.

 

*enter some comment about how you're a troll/WUM/Skate*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How will you measure it? There's no way to verify a claim unless it's 'this player will sign' or 'this player won't sign'

 

For example, in January the vman said we have several targets. I believed him, but we'll never know whether or not we did.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Problem here is that a good 90% of the proper itk stuff isn't written in such a way that is obvious. Names of people aren't given (even though the poster has that info), details are kept vague but hinted at in roundabout ways. You have to understand certain posters to find the real itk stuff on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem here is that a good 90% of the proper itk stuff isn't written in such a way that is obvious. Names of people aren't given (even though the poster has that info), details are kept vague but hinted at in roundabout ways. You have to understand certain posters to find the real itk stuff on here.

 

Creep

 

Kinda like this? KoloToureCreeps

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/KoloToureCreeps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've had some reliable information from time to time. However, it's usually shortly after it's appeared on the forum. I did call a big signing in the summer though.

 

 

Originally Posted by Saint Scott

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?44154-Summer-2013-HCDAJFU-Transfer-thread&p=1710963

 

Try reading posts #1968 and #1971

Edited by Saint Scott
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...