Jump to content

Liverpool wins and Southampton loses


Barry Sanchez
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-26543962

 

Hopefully now this will get Southampton's arse in to gear and actually provide a City thats inviting for visitors to stay in and spend money, I hope the cruises still continue to use the City but as long as people only use it as a gateway then the City will continue to lose out.

What really boils my **** is that it has be a cartel for so long what have they given back to the City in terms of things for visitors to do and visit there? Its only geograpical for them being there, so if people want more they will go elsewhere, Liverpool is only two hours from London if they want to leave straight away, one hour from the Lakes and 3 from Edinburgh so its not out of the way at all.

 

Get your arse into gear Southampton or a lot of people will be losing out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barry

A few points here in response to your post:

 

1. Liverpool is a great city to visit. However 20 years ago it was in a mess. Since then £2 billion worth of EC and Uk Grant money has been thrown in to pump prime the city centre and waterfront. In comparison Southampton has received buttons.

Land is much more expensive in Soton than Liverpool so investors need an incentive to develop here

2. As far as I am aware it has not cost the taxpayer a penny to fund the provision of 4 cruise terminals in Southampton Port. In comparison the Liverpool facility has been funded by EC Grants plus the Liverpool Council Tax payer

3. Southampton is still likely to be No1 UK cruise port for the foreseeable future for a number of reasons.

 

Hope this helps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barry

A few points here in response to your post:

 

1. Liverpool is a great city to visit. However 20 years ago it was in a mess. Since then £2 billion worth of EC and Uk Grant money has been thrown in to pump prime the city centre and waterfront. In comparison Southampton has received buttons.

Land is much more expensive in Soton than Liverpool so investors need an incentive to develop here

2. As far as I am aware it has not cost the taxpayer a penny to fund the provision of 4 cruise terminals in Southampton Port. In comparison the Liverpool facility has been funded by EC Grants plus the Liverpool Council Tax payer

3. Southampton is still likely to be No1 UK cruise port for the foreseeable future for a number of reasons.

 

Hope this helps

 

Not only is your post incorrect its not helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southampton is a dump - I have lived in Southampton, Bournemouth, Cornwall, New Jersey, New York and Glasgow and Southampton is the worst..... by far

 

All relative really. I've lived in Southampton (and close by), Plymouth, Exeter, Portsmouth, Crawley and Bognor. Admittedly some of these places for a short amount of time but Southampton is the best...by far.

 

It's not amazing. It's not ****. It has the potential to be much more though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All relative really. I've lived in Southampton (and close by), Plymouth, Exeter, Portsmouth, Crawley and Bognor. Admittedly some of these places for a short amount of time but Southampton is the best...by far.

 

It's not amazing. It's not ****. It has the potential to be much more though.

 

But you have to admit southampton city centre is a bit of a depressing dump.

Not visited Liverpool since the eighties so no comparison there.

Other towns that i've lived in and stayed in offer so much more.

IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a competition to which is the better City as there simply is no comparison, if you guys are on an average wage here the standard of living is far higher than Southampton, the issue is for our councillors to make it a more attractive place for visitors and residents alike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a competition to which is the better City as there simply is no comparison, if you guys are on an average wage here the standard of living is far higher than Southampton, the issue is for our councillors to make it a more attractive place for visitors and residents alike.

 

Our councillors what the **** are you on about? You don't even live this way. I love my city and am very proud of it. You on the other hand have moved away and can't wait to knock it. Sometimes I wish there was no internet - then we wouldn't have to put up with you or your comments. As to the standard of living it's all relative - tell me tho why did you move away? Was it to get a better standard of living because your wage here was low but transpose that to scouse land and you're probably better than average. I mean the scousers managed to survive and have a good standard of living while being on the dole for years on end. So once used to living of other peoples PAYE they now scam Europe for hand outs to build a new terminal for cruise ships - never ****ing ending handouts so you and your scouse mates can have a good standard of living.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only is your post incorrect its not helpful.

 

Barry

 

Interested to know what is incorrect.

 

Also not sure why it is deemed unhelpful.

 

Meanwhile if you are young and out for a good time Liverpool has far more to offer than Southampton and house prices and entertainment are generally cheaper than down here so money goes further.

 

There is a thriving black economy which helps too.

 

Lots of scallies to contend with though but generally the natives are friendly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barry

 

Interested to know what is incorrect.

 

Also not sure why it is deemed unhelpful.

 

Meanwhile if you are young and out for a good time Liverpool has far more to offer than Southampton and house prices and entertainment are generally cheaper than down here so money goes further.

 

There is a thriving black economy which helps too.

 

Lots of scallies to contend with though but generally the natives are friendly

 

Generally is not a rule that is all over is it? There are places in Liverpool that are far more expensive to live in than anywhere in Southampton, there are more people so more money is floating about, the outskirts are pretty good as well, West Kirby, Ormskirk, Formby, Crosby and Southport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barry

A few points here in response to your post:

 

1. Liverpool is a great city to visit. However 20 years ago it was in a mess. Since then £2 billion worth of EC and Uk Grant money has been thrown in to pump prime the city centre and waterfront. In comparison Southampton has received buttons.

Land is much more expensive in Soton than Liverpool so investors need an incentive to develop here

2. As far as I am aware it has not cost the taxpayer a penny to fund the provision of 4 cruise terminals in Southampton Port. In comparison the Liverpool facility has been funded by EC Grants plus the Liverpool Council Tax payer

3. Southampton is still likely to be No1 UK cruise port for the foreseeable future for a number of reasons.

 

Hope this helps

 

 

1) Southampton received an awful lot in money from the people passing through the City, what has been done to benefit the City?

2) Infrastructure in Southampton has benefited from the public purse for the acceptance of the cruises as Anderson said in the post.

3) Still likely is hardly definitive is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you able to let us know the hand outs for each city Barry? Honestly no idea myself but you seem knowledgeable. For some reason you don't seem to answer half the questions you ask though. Being so knowledgeable, I really wish you would though. We could all learn something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's quite funny that people are still trying to have a reasoned debate with "Barry" when he's just another incarnation of our favourite troll Stanley.

 

Ignore him and he'll f*ck off to Mumsnet or something.

 

Fully agreed. I live in Manchester but often work in Liverpool for some of my clients including Peel Group who are involved in the cruise ship terminal deal as owners of the Port of Liverpool. I gained my degree from Liverpool University and lived there for a number of years. I think it's a great city.

 

But I've never found the need to troll around comparing one city over another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I'm not trolling at all, thats a simple defensive method, where has the money gone and what have the council done with it? They have not invested in Southampton have they? Questions should be asked, if money is going to be taken away the local residents have every right to be ****ed off, its called caring about the City you were born in, the apathy on here clearly demonstrates why Southampton is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The councils over the years and the local businesses may well have let Southampton down badly since the post-war period (I could argue the employees in the docks also let the city down), but fact of the matter is that Liverpool have been handed an uneven playing field with this decision. Southampton Ocean Terminal has been built and improved with private finance, and Liverpool was given a public handout to fit with the self-entitled scroungers and theives that live there.

 

I am still angry about how ship-building in Hampshire was thrown to the wolves in order to bribe a few voters in Arthur Blackpudding land in the 80s and Sweaty Sock land this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For once I find myself agreeing with BS. Southampton has become a soulless cultural wasteland. I was born and brought up in the city and lived here all of my life. When I was young we had a stadium that held Speedway, greyhound racing and Stock car racing. There was an ice rink with an ice hockey team . The Lido, Southampton Show, latterly The Balloon Festival...all gone and not replaced. There are no decent museums. This city has had a remarkable history, but very little has been done to celebrate it. We missed the boat (if you'll forgive the pun) with the whole Titanic thing - other cities didn't. Sea City doesn't seem to know what it is and is hardly going to make people visit the city. I had a "conversation" with the City Coucil leader a few years ago about this and it was obvious that they were only interested in attracting more hotels and shopping areas. He said that they couldn't attract any entrepreneurs to provide money for attractions and asked if I knew any! As much as I detest that place down the M27 they are getting it right with their attractions. SCC just don't seem to care.

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For once I find myself agreeing with BS. Southampton has become a soulless cultural wasteland. I was born and brought up in the city and lived here all of my life. When I was young we had a stadium that held Speedway, greyhound racing and Stock car racing. There was an ice rink with an ice hockey team . The Lido, Southampton Show, latterly The Balloon Festival...all gone and not replaced. There are no decent museums. This city has had a remarkable history, but very little has been done to celebrate it. We missed the boat (if you'll forgive the pun) with the whole Titanic thing - other cities didn't. Sea City doesn't seem to know what it is and is hardly going to make people visit the city. I had a "conversation" with the City Coucil leader a few years ago about this and it was obvious that they were only interested in attracting more hotels and shopping areas. He said that they couldn't attract any entrepreneurs to provide money for attractions and asked if I knew any! As much as I detest that place down the M27 they are getting it right with their attractions. SCC just don't seem to care.

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

How many cities of Southampton's size have particularly successful or interesting museums? What sort of cultural attractions are wanted that are not provided? The problem is, the majority of people want nice shops and go to them to spend their money - it might not be particularly interesting though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The councils over the years and the local businesses may well have let Southampton down badly since the post-war period (I could argue the employees in the docks also let the city down), but fact of the matter is that Liverpool have been handed an uneven playing field with this decision. Southampton Ocean Terminal has been built and improved with private finance, and Liverpool was given a public handout to fit with the self-entitled scroungers and theives that live there.

 

I am still angry about how ship-building in Hampshire was thrown to the wolves in order to bribe a few voters in Arthur Blackpudding land in the 80s and Sweaty Sock land this year.

 

You're still angry about most stuff, aren't you?

 

If we want to talk uneven playing fields, perhaps we should talk about how the north half of the pitch was allowed to fall into disrepair for nigh on 20 years.

Edited by pap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The councils over the years and the local businesses may well have let Southampton down badly since the post-war period (I could argue the employees in the docks also let the city down), but fact of the matter is that Liverpool have been handed an uneven playing field with this decision. Southampton Ocean Terminal has been built and improved with private finance, and Liverpool was given a public handout to fit with the self-entitled scroungers and theives that live there.

 

I am still angry about how ship-building in Hampshire was thrown to the wolves in order to bribe a few voters in Arthur Blackpudding land in the 80s and Sweaty Sock land this year.

 

The good news about that is the little skates will never vote for those back stabbing cheating tory ***** again. As for the Liverpool dig, what about the proposed managed close down and sabotage of the City by the tories? Southampton always makes me proud when I see a tiny Island of red in a sea of ****e.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Southampton received an awful lot in money from the people passing through the City, what has been done to benefit the City?

 

How much money?

Who benefits? - hotels, port, taxi drivers, shops, cruise companies and all those people who work for and are associated with these companies.?

They either pay business taxes or income tax.

Where does this money go, it goes to Central Govt for re distribution, or to the EC as part of the membership deal.

How much money has Southampton got back in Business rates up until recently? 75% of the taxable revenue paid by local firms. Poor reward

Certain 'poorer' areas in the UK (plus London) have done very well out of this arrangement receiving more than their contributions

Areas such as Liverpool have benefited from money raised down here

They have also got billions from EC Objective One status

You can argue this is fair enough but you cant then moan about Southampton being a crap town in comparison when more or less every recent major project in Liverpool has benefitted from EC/UK Govt funding (apart from the Duke of Westminster's Liverpool One retail development) whereas Southampton Council have been forced to do deals on commercial market with companies who want a decent return and this means housing or retail

 

2) Infrastructure in Southampton has benefited from the public purse for the acceptance of the cruises as Anderson said in the post.

 

And you believe Joe Anderson????????????????????

The infrastructure project he was referring to was the rail line upgrade designed to take heavy freight containers off the road.

He probably didn't realise that most major UK ports obtained similar benefits, including Liverpool!!

 

3) Still likely is hardly definitive is it?

Explain!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many cities of Southampton's size have particularly successful or interesting museums? What sort of cultural attractions are wanted that are not provided? The problem is, the majority of people want nice shops and go to them to spend their money - it might not be particularly interesting though.

 

How do nice shops attract outsiders/tourists etc? Portsmouth, Winchester and even Salisbury have much to attract them. What has Southampton got apart from shops and hotels?

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much of this is now becoming subjective based on individuals personal preferences. I think Southampton could be a lot better than it is, but I don't think it is as bad as many make out.

 

I thought the thread should've been more about the subsidies given to Liverpool and whether that was 'fair' or not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do nice shops attract outsiders/tourists etc? Portsmouth, Winchester and even Salisbury have much to attract them. What has Southampton got apart from shops and hotels?

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Well nice shops do definitely attract outsiders and visitors, that is quite clear to see across the UK. So what do Portsmouth, Winchester and Salisbury have that attracts visitors that you want Southampton to also have?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well nice shops do definitely attract outsiders and visitors, that is quite clear to see across the UK. So what do Portsmouth, Winchester and Salisbury have that attracts visitors that you want Southampton to also have?

 

Portsmouth is a shyte hole. bar gunwharf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much of this is now becoming subjective based on individuals personal preferences. I think Southampton could be a lot better than it is, but I don't think it is as bad as many make out.

 

I thought the thread should've been more about the subsidies given to Liverpool and whether that was 'fair' or not...

I think pretty much everyone agrees such subsidies are unfair, I'm not sure how they can be defined as "fair".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think pretty much everyone agrees such subsidies are unfair, I'm not sure how they can be defined as "fair".

 

There's little point discussing it with you anyway, Sour Mash.

 

Isn't your default retort a one-line "oh no it isn't" for anything you don't agree with?

 

I prefer that line in panto, myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're still angry about most stuff, aren't you?

 

If we want to talk uneven playing fields, perhaps we should talk about how the north half of the pitch was allowed to fall into disrepair for nigh on 20 years.

 

Ah, wondered how long that cliche would take to be played.

 

The player didnt surprise me though...

 

Its just like the Sweaties using Thatcher and the Poll Tax as an excuse for independence; the best argument they've got is over 20 years old and sod all the bribing thats come since...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about them? You want Southampton to go and get an HMS Victory etc?

 

This is an interesting enough read, make of it what you will https://www.southampton.gov.uk/s-environment/future/ccplans/vipproj/cultural-quarter.aspx

 

Yes that is exactly what I am saying. Southampton should bid to bring Victory in and put it in Guildhall Square . I wasn't pointing out the "interesting" things that that shyte hole has. Oh no My next campaign is going to to bid for the Tower of London and put it on the Common

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, wondered how long that cliche would take to be played.

 

The player didnt surprise me though...

 

Its just like the Sweaties using Thatcher and the Poll Tax as an excuse for independence; the best argument they've got is over 20 years old and sod all the bribing thats come since...

 

Says the man who contributes to the UK economy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...