Jump to content

Wanyama's passing ability


Glasgow_Saint
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm a Vic fan but think Cork has done more than enough to keep the shirt at the moment. Nice to have two good players in this position. Wanyama's passing? Better at the beginning of the season but not great. Yes, some Celtic fans thought he was limited and over priced. Will improve. Is a beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes his passing ability is not as good as Cork, but give VW a break Palace left the grass a little longer to try and stop our passing game and the pitch was very bumper.

 

I think VW was excellent today and dealt with a suicide pass from Boruc late in the game very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, and you live in the right place to ask Celtic fans I guess.

 

Just dont recall any mention of his passing, certainly didnt notice it at the start of the season either.

 

Perhaps im now watching for it more closely? Just seems to give so many balls away

Edited by Glasgow_Saint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes only 22... Yes his passing ability is poor but I'm sure he will come good. I'd rather he learn from his mistakes now than later.

When Yaya Toure was 22, he probably wasn't as good... He is also being linked with Man City too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in that aspect I agree. He is tough in the tackle and presents " a strong physical presence "...... but his final pass is often poor and doesn't find his teammates.

 

Jack Cork was much better, but that's a bit academic now as JC will be out for several weeks and so it's up to Victor to get his act together and fight for his place...(without being yellow carded too often)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is calm in possession which is good BUT when you combine it with poor technical passing and poor awareness in possession it can make for some infuriating moments. Time for the coaching staff to work their magic as when we don't have the ball he is a man mountain in terms of his presence (when fit!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes only 22... Yes his passing ability is poor but I'm sure he will come good. I'd rather he learn from his mistakes now than later.

When Yaya Toure was 22, he probably wasn't as good... He is also being linked with Man City too...

 

Youre absolutely right he is young and like i said in the OP he has some great attributes.

 

With Corks injury Wanyama should now get a run in the side, hopefully his passing improves and then we have a great "little" player on our hands

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of interest did anyone think Cork was playing well today?

 

I thought he was poor to be honest.

 

Thought the whole team were below par today - not sure how much was due to CP's tactics?

 

Cork has been superb since he came into the side - hope he recovers quickly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought the whole team were below par today - not sure how much was due to CP's tactics?

 

Cork has been superb since he came into the side - hope he recovers quickly

 

 

The pitch was poor, we tried to adapt but it threw us a bit. You could see the ball bobble up and put the player into trouble a few times. Think our pass success rate was one of our poorest this season.

Edited by Window Cleaner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather a DM that can defend and today showed why he´s been missed for three months.

Take the lead, grind out and win the game "ugly" any day.

 

If people actually take their eyes off the ball sometimes and look at the areas he covers and helps CB´s out you might find something interesting.

He also prevents against other teams going long, having a striker dropping into midfield and winning every heading duel, like Stoke, West Ham and others has done when Vic has been out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather a DM that can defend and today showed why he´s been missed for three months.

Take the lead, grind out and win the game "ugly" any day.

 

If people actually take their eyes off the ball sometimes and look at the areas he covers and helps CB´s out you might find something interesting.

He also prevents against other teams going long, having a striker dropping into midfield and winning every heading duel, like Stoke, West Ham and others has done when Vic has been out.

 

TBH I think we all know you have no time for Jack Cork and think Victor is a better option but MP doesn't want to play "ugly" and "grind" out wins he wants to play possession football.So a DM like victor that can't pass for toffee causes a problem in that respect, constantly giving the ball away in our own half doesn't really go well with MPs desire to retain the ball high up the pitch. Having said that sometimes passing is less important than having a brick **** house in front of the back four. I don't see it as a one or the other but more horses for courses meaning there is a place for both Jack and Victor in the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH I think we all know you have no time for Jack Cork and think Victor is a better option but MP doesn't want to play "ugly" and "grind" out wins he wants to play possession football.So a DM like victor that can't pass for toffee causes a problem in that respect, constantly giving the ball away in our own half doesn't really go well with MPs desire to retain the ball high up the pitch. Having said that sometimes passing is less important than having a brick **** house in front of the back four. I don't see it as a one or the other but more horses for courses meaning there is a place for both Jack and Victor in the team.

 

Well, just to make it easier i highlighted a part above... Can you then explain why Victor was first choice ALL the time time until he got injured?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, just to make it easier i highlighted a part above... Can you then explain why Victor was first choice ALL the time time until he got injured?

I reckon it might have been the part you didn't highlight in bold from his post. This part:

 

Having said that sometimes passing is less important than having a brick **** house in front of the back four. I don't see it as a one or the other but more horses for courses meaning there is a place for both Jack and Victor in the team.

 

Not that that's necessarily my opinion, but his was fairly clear, I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon it might have been the part you didn't highlight in bold from his post. This part:

 

Having said that sometimes passing is less important than having a brick **** house in front of the back four. I don't see it as a one or the other but more horses for courses meaning there is a place for both Jack and Victor in the team.

 

Not that that's necessarily my opinion, but his was fairly clear, I thought.

 

But that´s not really the case if a player is picked as first choice for 13-14 games in a row?

 

Unless you say that "sometimes" in that sentence means "every time"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, just to make it easier i highlighted a part above... Can you then explain why Victor was first choice ALL the time time until he got injured?

 

We bought Victor, whose stock was high thanks to a couple of decent CL games, for 12 million quid not to many managers are brave enough to leave a new big money signing sitting on the bench. You could turn the question around and ask why even after his recovery Jack continued to be picked ahead of Victor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that´s not really the case if a player is picked as first choice for 13-14 games in a row?

 

Unless you say that "sometimes" in that sentence means "every time"?

 

Depends what you're asking, doesn't it? Are you asking why MoPo picked VW every time? Or what that guy thought in his post?

 

The guy you quoted suggested a reason why VW might have been picked over Cork, time and again. The "sometimes passing is less important than having a brick **** house in front of the back four."

 

He also expressed an opinion that, in his opinions, there was room for both players. The "I don't see it...." part was that.

 

Edit: Why am i explaining things here. I thought that was pretty clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We bought Victor, whose stock was high thanks to a couple of decent CL games, for 12 million quid not to many managers are brave enough to leave a new big money signing sitting on the bench. You could turn the question around and ask why even after his recovery Jack continued to be picked ahead of Victor?

 

After a damage with a fracture in your foot and being out for three months you dont rush a player into the team, very basic managing actually and the proper way to do it.

Compare players when their fitness is about the same and see who is picked.

 

Results pre Vic injury and after the same might show a thing or two also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends what you're asking, doesn't it? Are you asking why MoPo picked VW every time? Or what that guy thought in his post?

 

The guy you quoted suggested a reason why VW might have been picked over Cork, time and again. The "sometimes passing is less important than having a brick **** house in front of the back four."

 

He also expressed an opinion that, in his opinions, there was room for both players. The "I don't see it...." part was that.

 

And his comment was that MP doesn´t want to play ugly and grinding out and prefer possession football which was what I commented on.

Dont think he meant that Vic was the one playing the pretty possession game out of those two.

 

I can see the rest he said, and that´s why I highlighted a part of it and wanted to know an explanation of that part cause I couldn´t see it in the same way. (and still cant).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And his comment was that MP doesn´t want to play ugly and grinding out and prefer possession football which was what I commented on.

Dont think he meant that Vic was the one playing the pretty possession game out of those two.

 

I can see the rest he said, and that´s why I highlighted a part of it and wanted to know an explanation of that part cause I couldn´t see it in the same way. (and still cant).

Is that too much of a problem? Opinions are like arseholes. Or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that too much of a problem? Opinions are like arseholes. Or something.

 

No problem at all, just curious how he came to the conclusion about MP´s likes when I thought it had showed the other way around with his picked teams at the start of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And his comment was that MP doesn´t want to play ugly and grinding out and prefer possession football which was what I commented on.

Dont think he meant that Vic was the one playing the pretty possession game out of those two.

 

I can see the rest he said, and that´s why I highlighted a part of it and wanted to know an explanation of that part cause I couldn´t see it in the same way. (and still cant).

MP plays 'boring' grinding, possession football, that's what his game is. What were you expecting today?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem at all, just curious how he came to the conclusion about MP´s likes when I thought it had showed the other way around with his picked teams at the start of the season.

I don't know what that means. I've read it a few times. Perhaps I'm a bit dim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pitch was poor, we tried to adapt but it threw us a bit. You could see the ball bobble up and put the player into trouble a few times. Think our pass success rate was one of our poorest this season.

As someone else said the grass was left long too, a few shots on MOTD when the sun was on it emphasised that fact, and more so compared to the St Mary's snooker table surface. Fair play to Palace if they did cancel a last cut, we did the same against Man Utd a few years ago at WGS's instruction to the groundsman and we won with a nice goal in the 88th minute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets start by saying he has lots of attributes.... But sadly passing aint one.

 

Was he this bad at the start of the season? Did Celtic fans mention his passing?

I thought he was immense protecting the back four. Today was a battle against a poor and ugly but very direct and physical team. Wanyama was every bit as influential in the win as anyone. Loved it when he was put under pressure with a throw out by Boruc just outside the 18 yd box. He coped with it and released Shaw I think, and then gave Boruc the thumbs up. To me this is the reason why we are a good side, we take risks and want to play the ball. Total opposite to Palace, who are all effort but woefull.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was a coach I would be torn between having him do hours of shuttle runs to improve his fitness and speed, or hours of just knocking a ball against a wall to improve his passing and touch. He has a lot of work to do to look good in the Premier League. .When we get pressed high up the pitch he is a massive liability. Almost as bad as Jos. Cork every time for me at the moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched today as every week on NBC Sports here in US, think they re broadcast BT Sport, anyway, just before Vic came on there was a close up of Mo giving him a right old lecture, gesticulating with hand signals as if to say "sort and simple" passes, and then just before the slap on the back to go on he taps his temple as if to say "think" recon it worked, much better than last few run outs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...