Viking Warrior Posted 25 February, 2014 Share Posted 25 February, 2014 I see the police have annouced that Former Guantanamo detainee Moazzam Begg is one of four people who have been arrested on suspicion of terrorism offences linked to the Syria conflict. Its early days in this case but has he been unlucky and yet again an innocent bystander or a terrorist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 25 February, 2014 Share Posted 25 February, 2014 We'll let the justice process decide, shall we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 25 February, 2014 Author Share Posted 25 February, 2014 Whitley I dont think the justice process will decided , Give the new the J Downey , The IRA Hyde Park Bomber will not be prosecuted due to some letter the Blair govt and PSNI gave to about 187 Ira terrorist excluding them from prosecution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 25 February, 2014 Share Posted 25 February, 2014 With all due respect, the police are hardly likely to arrest someone if they're innocent are they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Duckhunter Posted 25 February, 2014 Share Posted 25 February, 2014 Perhaps he was having a crafty fag in the public loos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 25 February, 2014 Share Posted 25 February, 2014 Perhaps he was having a crafty fag in the public loos. Then he deserves to be banged up good and proper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 25 February, 2014 Share Posted 25 February, 2014 With all due respect, the police are hardly likely to arrest someone if they're innocent are they? With slightly less respect, have you ever heard of unfair arrest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 26 February, 2014 Share Posted 26 February, 2014 With all due respect, the police are hardly likely to arrest someone if they're innocent are they? Bear, do you really believe that ?? :mcinnes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 26 February, 2014 Share Posted 26 February, 2014 Bear, do you really believe that ?? :mcinnes: nah it was an alan partridge quote, my man pap got it immediately so he gets +10 reputations points, i'm afraid they will have to come out of ur allocation tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Duckhunter Posted 26 February, 2014 Share Posted 26 February, 2014 Whitley I dont think the justice process will decided , Give the new the J Downey , The IRA Hyde Park Bomber will not be prosecuted due to some letter the Blair govt and PSNI gave to about 187 Ira terrorist excluding them from prosecution Lucky for him that he blew up innocent people, had he grabbed a couple of chicks tits he'd be facing the full force of the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 26 February, 2014 Share Posted 26 February, 2014 Maybe the para's from Bloody Sunday should be let off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 February, 2014 Share Posted 26 February, 2014 nah it was an alan partridge quote, my man pap got it immediately so he gets +10 reputations points, i'm afraid they will have to come out of ur allocation tho Lord Morgan of Glossop is my fave, Bear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 26 February, 2014 Share Posted 26 February, 2014 Lucky for him that he blew up innocent people, had he grabbed a couple of chicks tits he'd be facing the full force of the law. The absence of the apostrophe in "chicks" needs clarification of the seriousness of the offence. Are we talking a chick's tits, or two chicks' tits. The difference between the two possibilities would have serious repercussions on the sentencing, as it is the difference between a first offence and possible serial misbehaviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 26 February, 2014 Share Posted 26 February, 2014 Lord Morgan of Glossop is my fave, Bear. AP: Ur in favour of hanging? LMoG: Yes, but only for criminals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 26 February, 2014 Share Posted 26 February, 2014 AP: Ur in favour of hanging? LMoG: Yes, but only for criminals. AP: What was adolescence like? LMoG: Like childhood, but with more pubic hair http://grooveshark.com/#!/album/Knowing+Me+Knowing+You+Radio+Series+1/6693937 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 26 February, 2014 Author Share Posted 26 February, 2014 (edited) Batman The paras will not be let off, Blair and co did not give them or any other soldier whether NI , Iraq or afghan a get out of jail free card Tony Blair , Man of the people but not the armed forces Edited 26 February, 2014 by Viking Warrior Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 26 February, 2014 Author Share Posted 26 February, 2014 following(Sein Fein MP Molloy statement "The arrest and charging by the British police of John Downey was a clear breach of commitments given by the British government at [the] Weston Park [talks] and in subsequent negotiations. "Following the Good Friday Agreement both the British and Irish governments accepted that the issue of those defined as on-the-runs was an anomaly and the two governments committed to resolve the issue" Its being suggested in some quarters Sein Fein (IRA) might seek compensation for wrongful arrest of downey I hope this isnt true and that it is just rumour mongering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now