Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'd say Chelsea are probably the best to watch, they have the most silky skills and whatnot. Stoke/Fulham/Palace/West Ham would be my vote for the worst, all terrible.

Posted

For me Villa is down in the bottom 3, only plays long counterattacks. Has minimal possession percentage in most games.

Norwich not much better imo. Obviously West Ham is in the bottom 1. Fulham quite dull but I think they at least try to use the midfield.

Posted

I don think we're good to watch at all. Most of the time we just knock the ball about really slowly in our own half. You only have to look at the amount of possession we have compared to the relatively low shots and goals to know that we have a lot of the ball but don't create much from it. We're only interesting if you like to watch teams holding on to the ball.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted
Sums up why England have never managed it. 70000+ fans screaming hurry up, get it forward every minute.

 

I've never seen 70000 fans in SMS.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted
I don think we're good to watch at all. Most of the time we just knock the ball about really slowly in our own half. You only have to look at the amount of possession we have compared to the relatively low shots and goals to know that we have a lot of the ball but don't create much from it. We're only interesting if you like to watch teams holding on to the ball.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

You have no business with modern elite football. You ought to go and watch lower leagues.

 

Seriously, you would prefer it.

 

Seriously.

Posted
Just stating the obvious, like saying that 49% win percentage is very good for football teams.

 

SO when asked who he thought was the best team to watch he should have declined to comment as it would have been stating the obvious?

Posted
SO when asked who he thought was the best team to watch he should have declined to comment as it would have been stating the obvious?

 

Not at all. It´s me that is stating the obvious, not him.

Posted
Not at all. It´s me that is stating the obvious, not him.

 

What that Mark Lawrenson thinks arguably the most attractive team to watch this season are the most attractive team to watch this season? What's the problem with that?

Posted
What that Mark Lawrenson thinks arguably the most attractive team to watch this season are the most attractive team to watch this season? What's the problem with that?

 

Not sure where I said it was a problem....maybe you can point me in the right direction?

Posted
Not sure where I said it was a problem....maybe you can point me in the right direction?

 

Not sure what point you were making then? "who would have guessed?" What does that mean?

Posted
Not sure what point you were making then? "who would have guessed?" What does that mean?

 

Just a cheeky little comment about a pundit. Only you seemed to have a problem with it, and you often comment when others posters here comments Lawros predictions...

 

Friend with him as you seem so often defend him on this forum?

Posted
Just a cheeky little comment about a pundit. Only you seemed to have a problem with it, and you often comment when others posters here comments Lawros predictions...

 

Friend with him as you seem so often defend him on this forum?

 

Just a little bit odd that so many people are so obsessed with him.

Posted

Turkish, why are you going out your way to try and make someone trip over there words? Have you got some syndrome where you need to feel superior or do you get boners from annoying people?

 

 

Also, how is Olallana's little jokey comment an indication to being 'obsessed'

Posted (edited)
The fact that Man City have score 458 goals already this season , means my vote goes to them.

 

Yep hands down and who would have guessed Lawro has a thing for the dippers

 

 

(as the other scouse journo himself concedes).

Edited by shurlock
Posted
Turkish, why are you going out your way to try and make someone trip over there words? Have you got some syndrome where you need to feel superior or do you get boners from annoying people?

 

 

Also, how is Olallana's little jokey comment an indication to being 'obsessed'

 

Talking of obssessed 3 of your last 9 posts have been about me.

Posted
Talking of obssessed 3 of your last 9 posts have been about me.

 

I thought you had a dislike for people selecting a random number of games or in this case posts to suit an argument?

 

Why are you on hear disrupting this thread anyway?

Posted
I thought you had a dislike for people selecting a random number of games or in this case posts to suit an argument?

 

Why are you on hear disrupting this thread anyway?

 

4 out of 10. :)

 

Not disrupting the thread. Just a bit odd that someone would have a go at a pundit for saying arugably the most attractive team to watch are the most attractive team to watch in his opion. I'd certainly put them in the top 2 along with Man City.

Posted
4 out of 10. :)

 

Not disrupting the thread. Just a bit odd that someone would have a go at a pundit for saying arugably the most attractive team to watch are the most attractive team to watch in his opion. I'd certainly put them in the top 2 along with Man City.

 

Number 5 ;)

Hardly having a go thoug was he.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...