trousers Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 David Conn @david_conn Manchester City in their annual report show an incredible £610m spent on transfer fees since 2008 when Sheikh Mansour of Abu Dhabi took over The £610m Manchester City spent buying players from 2008 excludes summer 2013, when club spent £102m (transfermarkt figure). Total: £712m. Manchester City annual report states that while club spent £610m on players from 2008-13, it received £112m transfer fees. Net spend: £498m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 You dont need to spend hundreds of millions to make the champions league. Or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Man City finances = Saints related? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fez Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Man City finances = Saints related? Of course because as the OP says, that's the financial power we're up against Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastor Patrón Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Last two games against them we beat them and drew with them. Even under Adkins we gave them a bit of a pounding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skintsaint Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Rodwell, Milner, Barry and Lescott cost 75m'ish on their own. Crazy really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 David Conn @david_conn Manchester City in their annual report show an incredible £610m spent on transfer fees since 2008 when Sheikh Mansour of Abu Dhabi took over The £610m Manchester City spent buying players from 2008 excludes summer 2013, when club spent £102m (transfermarkt figure). Total: £712m. Manchester City annual report states that while club spent £610m on players from 2008-13, it received £112m transfer fees. Net spend: £498m. I don't think we have to " compete " by spending more money than Citeh......do we ? They don't have 4 Academy players in their start side - (who cost us almost nothing in fees)... maybe that's why they've had to spend £ 000,000's on their current playing staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norwaysaint Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Last two games against them we beat them and drew with them. Even under Adkins we gave them a bit of a poundingMeaningless comment in this context. You don't reach Europe by having the team to win games, you do it by having the squad to maintain that winning habit over a season. We've got a great team, but not a top six squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastor Patrón Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Meaningless comment in this context. You don't reach Europe by having the team to win games, you do it by having the squad to maintain that winning habit over a season. We've got a great team, but not a top six squad. Yes because a couple of good quality squad players is going to set us back £600mill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Barry Sanchez in 3rd person said this 12 months ago even after the great start, the glass ceiling has been reached. If supporters are now realising it all well and good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 29 January, 2014 Author Share Posted 29 January, 2014 I don't think we have to " compete " by spending more money than Citeh......do we ? They don't have 4 Academy players in their start side - (who cost us almost nothing in fees)... maybe that's why they've had to spend £ 000,000's on their current playing staff. I wasn't suggesting that the ONLY way of "competing" is on a like for like basis (financially). Although I guess some (many?) will suggest that it IS the only way to be "competitive" in the PL these days. Open for debate I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andre Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Youth players are free. That's the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Youth players are free. That's the difference. Not exactly free. The Academy is quite expensive to run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloridaMarlin Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Ahem. Financial Fair Play rules anyone? Man City/Chelsea? Here's a coach and some horses, please feel free to take a drive through these rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KelvinsRightGlove Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Ahem. Financial Fair Play rules anyone? Man City/Chelsea? Here's a coach and some horses, please feel free to take a drive through these rules. With PSG & Monaco flashing the cash around (€250m for Messi FFS) Platini and co will never do anything about FFP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 With PSG & Monaco flashing the cash around (€250m for Messi FFS) Platini and co will never do anything about FFP. he has gone very quiet about it. not long ago, he was gobbing off all the time about the prem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andre Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 Not exactly free. The Academy is quite expensive to run. Ye know what I mean. More respect in raising one's own players, too. I say we keep doing that, and make a few semi-big signings here and there, rather than chucking hundreds of millions at it like t'others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 I wasn't suggesting that the ONLY way of "competing" is on a like for like basis (financially). Although I guess some (many?) will suggest that it IS the only way to be "competitive" in the PL these days. Open for debate I guess. Not really every team that has won the Premiership has spent an awful lot of money, even to qualify n a consistent basis you have to spend millions every year. We are were even with Cortese there capable of doing that, I'm sorry if people believed that but they were and are naive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 29 January, 2014 Share Posted 29 January, 2014 he has gone very quiet about it. not long ago, he was gobbing off all the time about the prem He was my favourite player when I was young, but take his glittering career away and you are left with a guy who has worse ideas than Blatter and similar levels of consistency when it comes to seeing them through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now