Jump to content

EXCLUSIVE: Manchester United plan to sign Adam Lallana


Saint-Armstrong

Recommended Posts

Love how many are quick to dismiss him and believe he would be better off staying put

 

http://www.redcafe.net/threads/adam-lallana.361862/page-3

Just had a read of that and most are quite complimentary. I don't really see very many incendiary posts throughout that. And I think this fella has it right: "He's decent. So was Young. So was Fellaini. I'm sick of buying decent. Our first team needs elite quality that is up there with the best players in the world, not Adam Lallana."

 

Fair enough point IMO. There's one thing fitting in to United's team; there's another thing going in and taking it up a level as Ozil did with Arsenal.

 

Could Lallana play for a top 4 side? Yes, I believe he could. Is he the signing that United need right now. No, I really don't think he is. And as "believe he would be better off staying put", others suggest he would be a better fit for Arsenal or Spurs. Again, a valid point IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chelsea were a top 6-8 side when Lampard went so not quite a top top side - akin to Lallana going to an Everton.

 

They finished 6th the season he joined and qualified for the champions league in his first season, spending millions and millions building the side that would become champions, not really like Everton is it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just had a read of that and most are quite complimentary. I don't really see very many incendiary posts throughout that. And I think this fella has it right: "He's decent. So was Young. So was Fellaini. I'm sick of buying decent. Our first team needs elite quality that is up there with the best players in the world, not Adam Lallana."

 

Fair enough point IMO. There's one thing fitting in to United's team; there's another thing going in and taking it up a level as Ozil did with Arsenal.

 

Could Lallana play for a top 4 side? Yes, I believe he could. Is he the signing that United need right now. No, I really don't think he is. And as "believe he would be better off staying put", others suggest he would be a better fit for Arsenal or Spurs. Again, a valid point IMO.

 

Not sure where you read about him being a fit for Arsenal but there are a couple of references to Spurs and for that reason many think he'd be better staying put because we're essentially at the same level :lol:

 

Many think he's flourishing where he's at a la Young and wouldn't get the same chances to express himself at United. All which would make someone pause for thought, notwithstanding the massive draw of a potential move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They finished 6th the season he joined and qualified for the champions league in his first season, spending millions and millions building the side that would become champions, not really like Everton is it.

 

Before the Abramovich era which took them to a level nobody could have predicted when Lampard joined. They would have arguably stayed outside the elite without that money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure where you read about him being a fit for Arsenal but there are a couple of references to Spurs and for that reason many think he'd be better staying put because we're essentially at the same level :lol:

 

From these comments.

 

"Looks more of an Arsenal type player to me, he'd be better than either of our wingers at the moment.. but he is more of a free role player."

and

 

"I don't think he has the step up to go beyond Arteta-like levels. Good player at good club."

Another compares him (favourably) to Nasri. There's far more positive comments on there than negative ones about Lallana (and SFC, to be fair) but I'd agree with most of them in that for the money he'd cost them, he's not a signing they need right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As good a signing as Lallana would be for United, I doubt the fans would accept them throwing stupid money at him unless they were putting greater resources into securing bigger and better players. As we know, there's no higher markup on player value than on a young Englishman in the January transfer window.

 

There's very little appreciation for the idea that Lallana will leave but not now. If he fulfils his immense potential then it's inevitable he'll move on... but in January, after half a season on top form and with a job half done at the team he leads? I really don't see it happening. If he does aspire to play at that level then he'll be confident enough in his abilities to know he'll get a better offer further down the line. United right now is a big risk compared to a certified Champions League team in the summer/next summer/the summer after.

Edited by DuncanRG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before the Abramovich era which took them to a level nobody could have predicted when Lampard joined. They would have arguably stayed outside the elite without that money.

 

They finished 4th in his first season, which was before the abramovich era. They spent £28m the season he signed and £45m the season before so hardly paupers miles away from the elite was it.

Edited by Turkish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From these comments.

 

"Looks more of an Arsenal type player to me, he'd be better than either of our wingers at the moment.. but he is more of a free role player."

and

 

"I don't think he has the step up to go beyond Arteta-like levels. Good player at good club."

Another compares him (favourably) to Nasri. There's far more positive comments on there than negative ones about Lallana (and SFC, to be fair) but I'd agree with most of them in that for the money he'd cost them, he's not a signing they need right now.

 

He is an Arsenal type player because shock and behold United play with pace down their wings and tend to have quite a rigid shape - not sure the suggestion is that he is Arsenal quality, though.

 

If he was, he'd certainly be good enough for united.

 

But given where united are, agree they need to set their sights higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They finished 4th in his first season, which was before the abramovich era. They spent £28m the season he signed and £45m the season before so hardly paupers miles away from the elite was it.

 

Chelsea were knocking on the doors when Lampard joined but they weren't in the inner circle a la United today. Perhaps Spurs is a slightly better analogy than Everton given their greater willingness to spend.

 

Either way, Lampard was fortunate in that he was able to grow with Chelsea and was established when Abramovich allowed them to buy who they liked and the expectation was that they would not only be going for titles but defending them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chelsea were knocking on the doors when Lampard joined but they weren't in the inner circle a la United today. Perhaps Spurs is a slightly better analogy than Everton given their greater willingness to spend.

 

Either way, Lampard was fortunate in that he was able to grow with Chelsea and was established when Abramovich allowed them to buy who they liked and the expectation was that they would not only be going for titles but defending them.

 

What point are you making here? Despite this relative "smallness" that you are trying to prove, Lampard still went. Your yeah-but-no-but stuff only helps your argument if Lampard decided to stay at West Ham and "develop his career" there. He didn't.

 

Because Chelsea were bigger than WHU. Much like Man U are bigger than we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

United currently 2-1 down to Hull (having been 2-0 down after 13 minutes). I think United need a bit more than Adam Lallana to sort themselves out.

 

David M:lol:yes.

 

 

 

(I still think they've finish this season in 3rd or 4th though :()

 

As I said, their first priority has to be defensively minded players. They've now Flethcher at CB I think since Raphael went off injured, Janusaj (or whatever he's called) has come on and made all the difference. They have all the AMs that they need just now..

Edited by Window Cleaner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said, their first priority has to be defensively minded players. They've now Flethcher at CB I think since Raphael went off injured, Janusaj (or whatever he's called) has come on and made all the difference. They have all the AMs that they need just now..

Fletcher is in midfield. Valencia just went to right back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said, their first priority has to be defensively minded players. They've now Flethcher at CB I think since Raphael went off injured, Janusaj (or whatever he's called) has come on and made all the difference. They have all the AMs that they need just now..

 

They do need someone who can permanently operate from the position that Rooney tends to drift back into. A creative central player, the type everyone thought Kagawa would be. Lallana has the potential for that role but they've previously bid for Modric and Herrera, and should have been after Ozil or Cabaye if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What point are you making here? Despite this relative "smallness" that you are trying to prove, Lampard still went. Your yeah-but-no-but stuff only helps your argument if Lampard decided to stay at West Ham and "develop his career" there. He didn't.

 

Because Chelsea were bigger than WHU. Much like Man U are bigger than we are.

 

We're discussing the extent to which players from smaller clubs can make the step up to the largest ones.

 

The suggestion is that the 'successful' moves identified involved moves to clubs that while bigger were not as big as suggested which made the step-up easier.

 

Perhaps the many failures gives a player food for thought if they think they're going to rot away on the bench. Perhaps it doesn't. Perhaps it raises the attractiveness of moves to clubs which are big in relative terms but not absolute ones where failures are most commonplace.

 

In the majority of cases, money and honours, however vicarious, talk and sh*t walks. But not all the time. It certainly didn't hurt us when Clyne chose us over united or other 'bigger' clubs. Would Lallana who has probably reached his peak and has half a season of excellent form behind him decide differently?

 

Its open for discussion - hence why mongboards exist.

Edited by shurlock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're discussing the extent to which players from smaller clubs can make the step up to the largest ones.

 

The suggestion is that the 'successful' moves identified involved moves to clubs that while bigger were not as big as suggested which made the step-up easier.

 

Perhaps the many failures gives a player food for thought if they think they're going to rot away on the bench. Perhaps it doesn't. Perhaps it raises the attractiveness of moves to clubs which are big in relative terms but not absolute ones where failures are most commonplace.

 

In the majority of cases, money and honours, however vicarious, talk and sh*t walks. But not all the time. It certainly didn't hurt us when Clyne chose us over united or other 'bigger' clubs. Would Lallana who has probably reached his peak and has half a season of decent form behind him decide differently?

 

Its open for discussion - hence why mongboards exist.

Also on another note. As Lallana is our captain and in form player, being intregal to the way we play, this type of interest can only give weight to us spending big and meeting Adams expectations here. The plan of being in the Chumps league in 5yrs cannot be realized if we lose our best players to the competition for places.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact is if they want him they will get him and Cortese will be swottted like a fly, why would you have a player at a club not wanting to be there?

 

Lallana didn't cost the club anything, so there is no cost to balance. The law is on Cortese's side and he can ask what he wants, particularly mid season. If he's swotted in the same way he was by Wenger for a schoolboy in league 1, well be looking at £40m and 50k a cap, plus a Faberge love egg. Bring it on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lallana didn't cost the club anything, so there is no cost to balance. The law is on Cortese's side and he can ask what he wants, particularly mid season. If he's swotted in the same way he was by Wenger for a schoolboy in league 1, well be looking at £40m and 50k a cap, plus a Faberge love egg. Bring it on...

 

 

But we have to give Bournemouth 25% of whatever we may get for him. The thought of giving them multiple million £s may rankle with some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But we have to give Bournemouth 25% of whatever we may get for him. The thought of giving them multiple million £s may rankle with some.

 

Where did you hear that? I didn't know that was part of the deal? Seems a strange clause to have as a 12 year old! Good forward thinking by Bournemouth if true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line is Adam knows he doesn't need to move to a more "prestigious" club to get an England call up, especially with someone like Gary Neville in the set up who has proved he knows his onions and has been blowing sunshine up Adams backside this season without prompting.

Also we know there is not a chance in hell that he would be sold for bobbins, as would have happened in our not too distant history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think you need worry about him leaving,it would take one massive deal to prise him away from family,his dream home that's still getting work done,friends and a general lovely life style that he would miss up north.

 

Yeah, Manchester isn't exactly a place I'd look to move to. The drizzle city of the world. At the end of the day, I don't imagine Adam will ever push for a move. If we don't want to sell, then he won't go anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think you need worry about him leaving,it would take one massive deal to prise him away from family,his dream home that's still getting work done,friends and a general lovely life style that he would miss up north.

:adore:

 

To be honest I don't see Man Utd as the club for a player like him anyway. If Arsenal or Chelsea came in then I'd be more worried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the season, if still performing and likely for an England place, I think NC should just tick his money up a bit so that the difference between what he might be offered and what he is getting doesn't dwarf the benefits he has in being a big fish, locality etc. Then if he wants a humongo deal in Summer of 2015, having scored or set up the winner for England, fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...